Focus problems using auto ISO
Sep 15, 2017 10:06:59 #
tommystrat wrote:
If you have enough time on your hands to post a snarky comment, why not use it instead to go out and shoot more pictures??
Or answer the OP's question.
Sep 15, 2017 10:07:57 #
If only we had a section called Chit-Chat, or something like that. Then comments that were not photo-related could be posted there. : )
Sep 15, 2017 10:08:34 #
tommystrat wrote:
If you have enough time on your hands to post a snarky comment, why not use it instead to go out and shoot more pictures??
Have around 3000+ images in Flickr. Much more in my backup. Considering my line of work, I would say Im doing fine. Browse through them if you like, its in my sig.
Sep 15, 2017 10:10:31 #
selmslie wrote:
Or answer the OP's question.
Really!? Without ALL the info left out only conjectures and theories could be posted. No one has really answered precisely if you all care to read instead of keeping your futile efforts to get personal.
Sep 15, 2017 10:14:19 #
DaveO wrote:
Good old Charmin! Charming as ever!
Maybe he's just a sad and lonely guy who finds his peace in bashing others?
Sep 15, 2017 10:15:16 #
chaman wrote:
Really!? Without ALL the info left out only conjectures and theories could be posted. No one has really answered precisely if you all care to read instead of keeping your futile efforts to get personal.
There was enough information. The question was clearly about auto focus not working.
I answered it: http://www.uglyhedgehog.com/t-485277-2.html#8161338
Do you have anything relevant to add to that?
Sep 15, 2017 10:18:40 #
tommystrat wrote:
Maybe he's just a sad and lonely guy who finds his peace in bashing others?
LOL! He gets plenty of practice!
Sep 15, 2017 10:20:23 #
selmslie wrote:
There was enough information. The question was clearly about auto focus not working.
I answered it: http://www.uglyhedgehog.com/t-485277-2.html#8161338
Do you have anything relevant to add to that?
I answered it: http://www.uglyhedgehog.com/t-485277-2.html#8161338
Do you have anything relevant to add to that?
I do. I will wait for your stupid remarks towards others that said essentially the same thing I did. You clearly want to make this a personal issue.
Sep 15, 2017 10:21:17 #
DaveO wrote:
LOL! He gets plenty of practice!
Thats true. The amount of morons here is out of this world, you been one of them.
Sep 15, 2017 10:22:14 #
Sep 15, 2017 10:25:34 #
Sep 15, 2017 10:38:13 #
As per below post, the situation being observed may not be at all related to the use of auto ISO, but, rather, the result of a reduced shutter speed that is being avoided when the operator manually sets ISO. For example, assuming aperture priority mode and manual ISO set to 400, the exposure might have the SS set to 1/100 sec. If auto-ISO were set up with a minimum SS of 1/50 sec and an ISO range starting at 200, the exposure for the same shot would result in a SS set to 1/50 sec at ISO 200. This slower SS could be the cause of the problem. In fact, auto ISO is often used to prevent the selection of a shutter speed that too slow for a hand held shot. This is done by setting the auto ISO minimum shutter speed to a value that is fast enough to avoid negative effects from camera shake. I don't often use auto ISO, but have used it to assure selection of an adequately fast SS in Aperture Priority mode.
SharpShooter wrote:
I don't think you have enough facts.
There should be NO correlation between A-iso and focus.
Perhaps to keep the ISO low, the camera is dropping the SS lower and she gets a bit of blur. When she sets her own ISO, at what is it set? Maybe, she has it set manually a bit higher it allows a higher SS, thus eliminating blur???
All purely guesses!!
SS
There should be NO correlation between A-iso and focus.
Perhaps to keep the ISO low, the camera is dropping the SS lower and she gets a bit of blur. When she sets her own ISO, at what is it set? Maybe, she has it set manually a bit higher it allows a higher SS, thus eliminating blur???
All purely guesses!!
SS
Sep 15, 2017 11:12:55 #
Mary Kate wrote:
I hear you. Lately, it seems that being a self-serving pompous ass is more important than offering a simple answer. Is intolerance the new norm??
No, but being a smartass online is pretty routine. Mean girls is not a becoming style for guys however. They don't seem to realize that - it's not very manly.
Sep 15, 2017 11:18:39 #
CHG_CANON wrote:
My leg hurts today and I see the sun is shining. Must be related ... And my pictures are not in focus ...
Post hoc ergo propter hoc--after it, therefore because of it. A classic logic fallacy.
Sep 15, 2017 11:33:46 #
CyberDave
Loc: Pennsylvania
Good Response> Thanks!:> CyberDave
SharpShooter wrote:
I don't think you have enough facts.
There should be NO correlation between A-iso and focus.
Perhaps to keep the ISO low, the camera is dropping the SS lower and she gets a bit of blur. When she sets her own ISO, at what is it set? Maybe, she has it set manually a bit higher it allows a higher SS, thus eliminating blur???
All purely guesses!!
SS
There should be NO correlation between A-iso and focus.
Perhaps to keep the ISO low, the camera is dropping the SS lower and she gets a bit of blur. When she sets her own ISO, at what is it set? Maybe, she has it set manually a bit higher it allows a higher SS, thus eliminating blur???
All purely guesses!!
SS
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.