Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Post-Processing Digital Images
Correcting Angles
May 24, 2017 20:15:55   #
mrjcall Loc: Woodfin, NC
 
Earlier this week, I posted the first image of Pearson Falls in the Long Exposure forum. After looking at this image for some time, I began to realize that the angles were all off and a bit disorienting. When I shot the image, I had tilted the camera to the left to make the falls ledges look level. It did the trick, but also made the trees lean way right and the catch pool look like it was tilted to the right. Confusing for the eye, at least to me.

So, I re-edited the image knowing that I would process it through DxO Viewpoint to correct the angles. This meant I would lose a lot of the foreground in the effort so I cropped less to allow sufficient foreground.

See if you can tell the difference and if the second one works better......or does it even really matter? It does for me. 😉
Jim

Original
Original...
(Download)

Corrected Angles in DxO Viewpoint
Corrected Angles in DxO Viewpoint...
(Download)

Reply
May 24, 2017 22:45:55   #
kpmac Loc: Ragley, La
 
Very nice. Good job.

Reply
May 25, 2017 05:45:03   #
Jim-Pops Loc: Granbury, Texas
 
Not seeing much difference without studying what you did. I think you just have to satisfy yourself no one else will notice.

Reply
 
 
May 25, 2017 06:16:08   #
kubota king Loc: NW , Pa.
 
I see the difference pretty easy . Trees on the left straight now and the bottom left of photo has the rocks at a more level plane ,Tommy

Reply
May 25, 2017 08:51:48   #
abc1234 Loc: Elk Grove Village, Illinois
 
I do not think it matters much one way or the other. I thought the original post was fine as is. Trees can tilt if they are on a slope and I accepted that as natural. Sure, you can see a difference but does it really matter? Most viewers would not see a problem if presented with the first print only.

As for straightening, I find LR's tools do an excellent job and are easy to use. Furthermore, they do it on the raw so you do not have to make a tiff. I looked at DxO several years ago and did not think it added that much to LR.

Reply
May 25, 2017 09:03:48   #
mrjcall Loc: Woodfin, NC
 
abc1234 wrote:
I do not think it matters much one way or the other. I thought the original post was fine as is. Trees can tilt if they are on a slope and I accepted that as natural. Sure, you can see a difference but does it really matter? Most viewers would not see a problem if presented with the first print only.

As for straightening, I find LR's tools do an excellent job and are easy to use. Furthermore, they do it on the raw so you do not have to make a tiff. I looked at DxO several years ago and did not think it added that much to LR.
I do not think it matters much one way or the othe... (show quote)


DxO by itself doesn't help much. It's DxO Viewpoint that has much more extensive perspective correction tools than LR. I have version 2, but they have a new version 3 that's even better.

Reply
May 25, 2017 09:11:56   #
abc1234 Loc: Elk Grove Village, Illinois
 
mrjcall wrote:
DxO by itself doesn't help much. It's DxO Viewpoint that has much more extensive perspective correction tools than LR. I have version 2, but they have a new version 3 that's even better.


Thanks for the clarification. I believe I looked at Viewpoint. For my needs, LR is sufficient and keeps my workflow fast and simple. Also, I do nothing less than 18 mm.

Reply
 
 
May 25, 2017 10:01:01   #
DavidJon Loc: Ada, Oklahoma
 
The change is slight but I agree the correction makes the better photo.

Reply
May 25, 2017 11:35:58   #
Desert Gecko Loc: desert southwest, USA
 
I might be missing something, but did you apply lens correction in Lr? That would be my starting point. Then, I might try some custom correction if and as needed in Lr as well.

I'm with abc1234 that the trees can lean, as they often do naturally. The pool of water at the bottom right was the only issue for me, but not before reading your comment.

Very nice photo, btw.

Reply
May 25, 2017 11:36:31   #
R.G. Loc: Scotland
 
mrjcall wrote:
......After looking at this image for some time......


That was your big mistake lol. It's not nearly as noticeable as you think. If you hadn't mentioned the trees etc I wouldn't have noticed anything wrong. Apart from that, how often are trees obligingly vertical?

Reply
May 25, 2017 23:34:30   #
KTJohnson Loc: Northern Michigan
 
Nice shot! However, the leaning trees don't really matter, it's the falls that matter. Water drops vertically unless it's really moving fast. So, since you asked, it still leans a bit to the right. Line up the small rivulets vertically and you've got it.

Reply
 
 
May 27, 2017 11:09:55   #
BigDaddy Loc: Pittsburgh, PA
 
It's very noticeable in the download view, not so much in the small view. Trees generally grow vertically, not at a 40 degree angle, and the adjusted photo is much more realistic to me.

Reply
May 28, 2017 21:01:24   #
Bunkershot Loc: Central Florida
 
Your re-do is excellent and much more pleasing to view.

Reply
Jun 17, 2017 15:00:39   #
MtnMan Loc: ID
 
The corrected looks much better to me. Nice work!

Reply
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Post-Processing Digital Images
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.