Media photographers are too noisy.
Feb 14, 2017 13:54:59 #
mflowe wrote:
America won, you lost. Get over it.
Trump one. The jury is still out on whether that is synonymous with a win for the rest of the country. Hopefully, even someone as mentally challenged as you appear to be can understand that.
Feb 14, 2017 14:32:16 #
Dds82 wrote:
Just watching a trump media event with our prime m... (show quote)
Louis, your complaint is noted and sympathized with. Those folk are not interested in your desires, wishes, needs. They are focused (sorry) on getting an image that their editors will like so they can collect a paycheck at the end of the week. That's all that concerns them. Next week, at the football game, the shoe will be on the other foot, but today they are totally self-centered.
Of course the rest of are never self-centered. Just check with your wife. LOL
I am an ordained clergy, even though I haven't been a pastor of a church in 40 years. But I do get asked to perform weddings. Wedding photographers have to be told, "No flashes during the ceremony." You'd think I was asking them to swallow jalapeno peppers for the whole ceremony. Why don't they understand that their flashes interfere with the rest of the congregation/attenders? (Of course the same is true for all those friends of the bride/groom who use flash on their cellphones. (To be clear, I have no trouble with flash at any other time. In fact doing a wedding without flash is almost impossible)
Feb 14, 2017 14:35:24 #
burkphoto wrote:
Yes, and in a couple of months, we will have a camera that will take 30 18MP 6K stills per second. It's called the GH5. And it will take those 30fps SILENTLY.
https://www.dpreview.com/reviews/panasonic-lumix-dc-gh5-first-impressions-review
https://www.dpreview.com/reviews/panasonic-lumix-dc-gh5-first-impressions-review
Maybe I wasn't looking on the right page, but I couldn't find anything specifically about the shutter; does it use an "electronic shutter" exclusively?
Feb 14, 2017 14:39:04 #
Reinaldokool wrote:
Companies have made impressive progress with "insanely high" ISO settings. With the possible exception of fill flash to over-ride natural shadows, I'm not sure why anyone would need to use a flash in a few years.... br I am an ordained clergy, even though I have... (show quote)
Feb 14, 2017 14:57:40 #
Jim Bob wrote:
Trump one. The jury is still out on whether that is synonymous with a win for the rest of the country. Hopefully, even someone as mentally challenged as you appear to be can understand that.
I believe that if you read the rules on this forum, personal attacks on someone are not allowed. I wish people would get over the hate in this country and try to be civil towards each other. We are all Americans and I would hope we all strive for our country to succeed, whoever is elected President.
Feb 14, 2017 14:58:44 #
leftj
Loc: Texas
photoflorida wrote:
I believe that if you read the rules on this forum, personal attacks on someone are not allowed. I wish people would get over the hate in this country and try to be civil towards each other. We are all Americans and I would hope we all strive for our country to succeed whoever is elected.
I'm good with that.
Feb 14, 2017 15:00:38 #
mflowe
Loc: Port Deposit, MD
Jim Bob wrote:
Trump one. The jury is still out on whether that is synonymous with a win for the rest of the country. Hopefully, even someone as mentally challenged as you appear to be can understand that.
Typical liberal response, attack someone personally. You can't even spell a 3 letter word- "won" and you're calling me mentally challenged.
Feb 14, 2017 15:15:28 #
mflowe
Loc: Port Deposit, MD
Peterff wrote:
So why do you?
Because I'm not a cuck. I fight back. I am perfectly content to keep my political opinions to myself until prodded.
Feb 14, 2017 15:23:18 #
There is enough arguing and fighting on political sites and the daily news. Photography is a chance to get away from it (unless of course we're photographing a politico from the other party (which ever that might be)).
Feb 14, 2017 15:34:37 #
rehess wrote:
Companies have made impressive progress with "insanely high" ISO settings. With the possible exception of fill flash to over-ride natural shadows, I'm not sure why anyone would need to use a flash in a few years.
Off camera strobe gives a chance to shape the subject that is useful and will never be replaced solely by having enough light if the light isn't also coming from the right direction. That's why multiple strobes and different light modifiers are so useful (necessary?) in a studio. Whether shooting on location portraits or indoor events, radio controlled off camera lighting opens up many creative possibilities.
Feb 14, 2017 16:00:23 #
mflowe wrote:
Because I'm not a cuck. I fight back. I am perfectly content to keep my political opinions to myself until prodded.
Then why did you introduce them in the first place? Perhaps that is why you were prodded. Apparently you are easily provoked. And easily so.
As for your self description, - I may be so bold as to ask whether you are sure about the pejorative term that you used, and whether or not it applies to yourself.
Feb 14, 2017 16:34:40 #
Jakebrake wrote:
This thread is headed for the 'attic', with silly inane and obviously politically motivated posts like this.
What else can you expect from San Francisco?
Feb 14, 2017 17:40:26 #
Feb 14, 2017 17:42:26 #
Feb 14, 2017 17:45:14 #
CatMarley wrote:
What else can you expect from San Francisco?
Something that you cannot comprehend, little missy, God bless your heart!
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.