Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main Photography Discussion
Media photographers are too noisy.
Page <<first <prev 6 of 10 next> last>>
Feb 14, 2017 10:41:45   #
photoflorida Loc: No where
 
Gene51 wrote:
img src="https://static.uglyhedgehog.com/images/s... (show quote)


Very unnecessary to give your political views on this forum.

Reply
Feb 14, 2017 10:45:12   #
photoflorida Loc: No where
 
Dusty wrote:
I think it is better to hear the camera's then to hear Trump.


Does this contribute to the question that was asked. I think not!

Reply
Feb 14, 2017 11:17:51   #
Fotoartist Loc: Detroit, Michigan
 
Long thread. Didn't read it all. But am wondering why they still don't require the still photogs to put their cameras in Quiet mode! If they don't have it, can't take pics.

Reply
 
 
Feb 14, 2017 11:24:10   #
leftj Loc: Texas
 
Fotoartist wrote:
Long thread. Didn't read it all. But am wondering why they still don't require the still photogs to put their cameras in Quiet mode! If they don't have it, can't take pics.


Answers to your question is in the thread.

Reply
Feb 14, 2017 11:38:03   #
burkphoto Loc: High Point, NC
 
Fotoartist wrote:
Long thread. Didn't read it all. But am wondering why they still don't require the still photogs to put their cameras in Quiet mode! If they don't have it, can't take pics.


Do you really think a president's "handlers" want such conversations to be heard? When the prez goes off script, bad things happen.

I remember Ronnie Rednuke (Ronald Reagan) joking, when testing a microphone, "My fellow Americans, I'm pleased to tell you today that I've signed legislation that will outlaw Russia forever. We begin bombing in five minutes." THAT spilled a lot of NPR listeners' coffee on their laps!

Reply
Feb 14, 2017 11:39:54   #
Rathyatra Loc: Southport, United Kingdom
 
Dusty wrote:
I think it is better to hear the camera's then to hear Trump.



Reply
Feb 14, 2017 12:06:33   #
chasgroh Loc: Buena Park, CA
 
GoofyNewfie wrote:
This answer from a thread I started a while ago:


...this.

Reply
 
 
Feb 14, 2017 12:07:46   #
alliebess Loc: suburban Philadelphia
 
Starphotog wrote:
I am and have been a photojournalist for 40 yrs now. I have some insight on this subject! TV WANTS us to be there with the sounds and sights of still photogs moving and clicking away. It legitimizes their existance at an event! The politicians would DIE if we WEREN'T there, we ALSO legitimize their being there as well!
We are there to capture THE moment as stated in a reply above. Im a Canon X body shooter, nothing is silent about that camera! The X2 has a good silent mode BUT to get silent you give up speed and you cant give up speed...! Editors want expression, reaction and quality. Its like the Lays potato chip ad.. you cant eat or shoot just one! Your next photo MIGHT be "THE PHOTO" so we shoot in hopes that the next one is the best one, plain and simple! They are called press conferences for a reason not public relations conferences. With the presence of one photog and reporter thousands upon thousands of people are informed of what occurred at the presser (if the reporter doesnt slant the coverage) I or we only worry about the "noise" at certain events and a presser isnt one of em!
I am and have been a photojournalist for 40 yrs no... (show quote)


Thanks for presenting the journalist's view - makes me, an amateur who sometimes covers events where I work - feel much better about what I'm doing.

Reply
Feb 14, 2017 12:18:44   #
lamiaceae Loc: San Luis Obispo County, CA
 
Dusty wrote:
I think it is better to hear the camera's then to hear Trump.



Reply
Feb 14, 2017 12:31:14   #
DMGill Loc: Colorado
 
I photography a LOT of events with political speakers and frequently put my camera in high-speed drive in order to get the best image possible. Many people have highly mobile faces when speaking and that frequently makes the number of 'less than flattering' images to acceptable images 10 to 1 or worse. Silent mode slows the camera down too much and it isn't possible to accurately time when a speaker's face is going to be in what we 'see' as a normal position. It's unacceptable to finish an event without great images of each speaker. The good news is that in high-speed mode, the D5 is quieter than the D3 and the D500 is much quieter than even the D5. In the film days I still used a motor drive on my F2, it just didn't rock along at 10 frames a second. Technology is improving!

Reply
Feb 14, 2017 12:55:36   #
jaymatt Loc: Alexandria, Indiana
 
aardq wrote:
This is a photography forum, not a political forum. If the politics keeps up, this forum will end up in the toilet. I don't care who you are, or what you think as long as we all work to improve our photography. There are many political sites that you can go to which allow you to vent, this should not be one off them. I ask the mods to remove all political comments so we can get back to why we're here.



Reply
 
 
Feb 14, 2017 13:30:01   #
burkphoto Loc: High Point, NC
 
DMGill wrote:
I photography a LOT of events with political speakers and frequently put my camera in high-speed drive in order to get the best image possible. Many people have highly mobile faces when speaking and that frequently makes the number of 'less than flattering' images to acceptable images 10 to 1 or worse. Silent mode slows the camera down too much and it isn't possible to accurately time when a speaker's face is going to be in what we 'see' as a normal position. It's unacceptable to finish an event without great images of each speaker. The good news is that in high-speed mode, the D5 is quieter than the D3 and the D500 is much quieter than even the D5. In the film days I still used a motor drive on my F2, it just didn't rock along at 10 frames a second. Technology is improving!
I photography a LOT of events with political speak... (show quote)


Yes, and in a couple of months, we will have a camera that will take 30 18MP 6K stills per second. It's called the GH5. And it will take those 30fps SILENTLY.

https://www.dpreview.com/reviews/panasonic-lumix-dc-gh5-first-impressions-review

Reply
Feb 14, 2017 13:30:21   #
Peterff Loc: O'er The Hills and Far Away, in Themyscira.
 
mflowe wrote:
Why is it liberals always have to inject their snarky little political pov's into everything. This is a photography forum, not Huffington Post.


So why do you?

Reply
Feb 14, 2017 13:49:15   #
Jim Bob
 
Dds82 wrote:
Just watching a trump media event with our prime minister Justin Trudeau, and you can barely hear them talk because there is an extremely noisy background barrage of camera shutters. How annoying! Two questions:

1. Why on earth do the photographers need 100's if not 1000's of photos to get one good enough for their media platform?

2. Why on earth do they NOT put there cameras in " silent mode"? My 5D has this feature and I assume most cameras do as well. Professional photographers have high end cameras that must offer a silent mode. I don't believe they are using flash since the lighting is very good so we can't blame it on flashes.

Louis
Just watching a trump media event with our prime m... (show quote)


One could argue the noisier the better since most of the time the politicians have little of substance to say.

Reply
Feb 14, 2017 13:53:05   #
Bill P
 
It's partly the compression, and it's partly the poor education or training photographers get today. We all need to learn this simple lesson: spray and pray doesn't work. And not all of those cameras have a silent mode, and since they are using DSLRs, the mirror slap is still there.

And no, I don't want to hear him either, but that's another forum.

Reply
Page <<first <prev 6 of 10 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.