carmenpmiller wrote:
Hi! I'm new to uglyhedgehog ...I like the idea of some of the newer cameras that can upload directly as this saves a step. However, I'd love input as to whether or not that is all its cracked up to be....I just want that crisp clarity that comes from a better camera...or perhaps possibly, just a better lens...or both?
First of all, "direct upload" of full size images isn't very practical in most cases. Built-in WiFi that you'll find on many cameras is sort of a one-way street, is more useful remotely controlling the camera than for retrieving images off of them... Sure, it can be done... But is only practical for the occasional image and/or for smaller, lower resolution files. Higher quality image files tend to be too big to transfer in any volume using standard WiFi. Short range (about 25 feet max) and "iffy" reliability are other limiting factors. Also, in regular use WiFi much more rapidly drains the camera's battery, significantly reducing the number of shots-per-charge that will be possible.
60D is "Eye-Fi ready".... meaning it can be used with Eye-Fi SD memory cards that both store image files and provide a means of WiFi communication. However, those typically are even less reliable and have shorter range than built-in WiFi.
There are some alternatives, if it's really important.... More capable and sophisticated wireless networking devices are available and more practical for image downloading, thanks to better connectivity and capacity, as well as much greater range. Though not for 60D, Canon themselves make "WFT" or "wireless file transfer" modules for certain models... rather pricey ($600 to $800) and limited to use only on a particular camera. Third party manufacturers make more universal and affordable models, such as Camranger (about $300), which is usable with 60D (and nearly all other Canon DSLRs). The Camranger's offers up to about 150 feet range, if memory serves, compared to Canon WFT with a range of up to 300 or even 400 feet.
Some photographers set their camera's to RAW + Small JPEG and have only the JPEGs wirelessly downloaded. Those serve as more quickly and easily downloadable proof files, while they still have the full size RAW file available for best possible image quality after post-processing. I don't know how practical or possible this is with 60D and Camranger, for example, but I'd recommend looking into it, if you think it might meet your needs.
60D is a quite decent 18MP camera. Very capable of making excellent images. Sure there are 20MP 70D and 7D Mark II, as well as 24MP 80D with all the latest "gee whiz" stuff..... but don't be too quick to give up on your 60D.
You didn't mention what lens(es) you're using, but very likely upgrading to a more premium lens for use on the 60D would give you more "bang for your buck" in image quality, than would buying a whole new camera with yet another "kit" lens. I'm guessing you have either an EF-S 18-55mm or EF-S 18-135mm. Those are usually what came in kit with the 60D .
For portraiture there are a number of excellent lenses. On an APS-C camera like the 60D, I use Canon EF 50mm f1.4, EF 85mm f1.8, and EF 24-70mm f2.8L a lot for portrait work. I also use Tamron SP 60mm f2.0 Macro sometimes (I do not like most other macro lenses for portraiture... if anything they can be too sharp). Sometimes when I need longer focal length (mostly outdoors) I either use Canon EF 135mm f2L, unless I want the versatility of a zoom such as EF 70-200/2.8L IS or the somewhat smaller EF 70-200/4L IS.
I don't personally use them but there also are the Canon EF-S 17-55mm f2.8 and EF-S 15-85mm, both upgrades from the standard "kit" lenses and capable of very high quality images, though more "general purpose" focal length ranges.
There are also ultra premium Canon EF 50mm f1.2L and 85mm f1.2L portrait lenses, popular with wedding photographers in particular. These are a bit more challenging to work with... plus are a lot bigger, heavier and far more expensive.
And, there are some other, excellent third party lenses... Sigma, Tokina and Tamron.
Honestly, the kit lenses are pretty good.... but many of the lenses mentioned can be used to take specialty work such as portraiture to another level. And a big part of getting the best out of any lens (or camera) is down to the photographer's experience and skill... The gear itself is just a tool and can only do what it's told to do. A class or some books might be as good an investment as a new lens.
So, I'd keep the 60D... but note one thing. Many Canon cameras have Micro Focus Adjustment feature (MFA). The 60D doesn't. So it might pay to have whatever lenses you use professionally calibrated with the camera, to fine tune focus and get that last little bit of performance out of everything. The 70D and 80D models, for example, both have MFA.... which can be used to fine tune focus accuracy of up to 40 different specific lenses to the particular camera. However, the user has to do this themselves and it takes a bit of work (might want a software such as Reikan FoCal to help).
But that's a moot point, if you keep the 60D and upgrade lenses instead, which is what I'd recommend initially (later you might want to upgrade to an 80D or 7D Mark II camera... but don't be too quick about it, "better" lenses you get now to use on 60D will serve well on any future Canon, too).
One last thing that's often overlooked... If you haven't done so recently , or maybe never, have your camera's sensor professionally cleaned. Yes, the 60D has a self-cleaning sensor. It works, but that can only do so much. Over time there is still often some gradual build up of adhered dust, oils spots and other gunk on sensors that robs some image resolution and sharpness, among other things. A dirty sensor can definitely effect images!