I need adive
Jan 10, 2016 01:49:08 #
Take both those lenses. In my opinion, none of your gear is heavy let alone when combined.
Agreed, that candid shot might not be there if you're required to switch lenses.
SteveR wrote:
Consider two cameras so you don't have to switch lenses.
Agreed, that candid shot might not be there if you're required to switch lenses.
Jan 10, 2016 01:49:20 #
That sounds like a great idea ,I have not though of the double harness . I will consider it. Thank you
Jan 10, 2016 02:12:02 #
G M P wrote:
That sounds like a great idea ,I have not though of the double harness . I will consider it. Thank you
I went through Monument Valley with one camera and kept changing out two lenses. It was a royal pain. Once I bought my D800, I keep my 10-24mm on my D7000 and don't change lenses anymore on vacation.
Jan 10, 2016 04:16:34 #
The two lenses you have quoted do cover a good range, unless you intend to photograph any wild life. So for landscape and general work the two lenses should meet your requirements.
In addition I would include in your photo bag a circular polarizer and some graduated neutral density filters (soft)
Enjoy your trip.
In addition I would include in your photo bag a circular polarizer and some graduated neutral density filters (soft)
Enjoy your trip.
Jan 10, 2016 07:19:38 #
Just a short question, G M P.
Did you try Googling something like "Galapagos photography tips"? The results include a number of articles and a video or two from photographers and travelers who have actually "been there, done that."
Just a suggestion.
Did you try Googling something like "Galapagos photography tips"? The results include a number of articles and a video or two from photographers and travelers who have actually "been there, done that."
Just a suggestion.
Jan 10, 2016 09:30:15 #
I've never been there but I have friends who have been there and I've seen the photos. From what I've seen I think that the two lenses you have will cover what you need.
Jan 10, 2016 10:58:06 #
I would take both lenses. You have them and the coverage with both are different and you will use that difference to capture images. Have fun.
G M P wrote:
I have a canon 70d . I am going to the Galapagos ,I am considering bringing two lenses 18-135 zone and a 70-300 zone . I do not want to carry more them I need however I do not want find out when I get there I carried the wrong lenses with me . Any advice would be appreciated. G M P
Jan 10, 2016 16:35:12 #
I want to thank everyone that responded to my post "I need adive " should have been advise .Thank you for taking the time ,you have all been a great help to me . I hope one day I will have the knowledge to do the same for someone G M P
Jan 11, 2016 05:45:21 #
G M P wrote:
I have a canon 70d . I am going to the Galapagos ,I am considering bringing two lenses 18-135 zone and a 70-300 zone . I do not want to carry more them I need however I do not want find out when I get there I carried the wrong lenses with me . Any advice would be appreciated. G M P
Looks like you want to travel light, do you plan on carrying a monopod or tripod? Maybe a single 18-200 would be good. In my experience, anything more than 200 needs stabilization. Just my experience. ;)
Jan 11, 2016 06:08:43 #
i take all my camera gear,when i go out to shoot,if im,going to a game or a family dinner,i take my phone camera or point and shoot,its a different
frame of mind, going to the game, to shoot the game,or am i going to watch the game,
frame of mind, going to the game, to shoot the game,or am i going to watch the game,
Jan 11, 2016 06:30:08 #
Jan 11, 2016 06:39:12 #
pjarbit
Loc: Detroit, Michigan
I just took a similar trip. I used a 16-35 and a 70 to 200. Worked out very well. (both 2.8) I use a Black rapid Yeti Strap with a lensflipper that worked amazingly well.
http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/search?N=10936415&InitialSearch=yes&sts=pi
http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/search?N=11084882&InitialSearch=yes&sts=pi
As long as you have your wide covered by the 18 and the zoom by your 300, you should be all set.
http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/search?N=10936415&InitialSearch=yes&sts=pi
http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/search?N=11084882&InitialSearch=yes&sts=pi
As long as you have your wide covered by the 18 and the zoom by your 300, you should be all set.
Jan 11, 2016 06:58:31 #
I went about 10 years ago
You probably do not need the longer lens as the animals are very "tame" and approach humans fearlessly. However, you are not allowed to approach them. You have to stay on designated paths that take you near the animals. I took an Olympus 300 E-volt with 14-45 lens. (No, the camera is not 100 years old) There were only one or two situations where I wished I had had a longer lens. The 18 - 135 should be plenty. As another writer stated, you have to carry everything with you. Enjoy - the nature trip of a lifetime!
You probably do not need the longer lens as the animals are very "tame" and approach humans fearlessly. However, you are not allowed to approach them. You have to stay on designated paths that take you near the animals. I took an Olympus 300 E-volt with 14-45 lens. (No, the camera is not 100 years old) There were only one or two situations where I wished I had had a longer lens. The 18 - 135 should be plenty. As another writer stated, you have to carry everything with you. Enjoy - the nature trip of a lifetime!
Jan 11, 2016 06:59:26 #
Forgot to add - No flash allowed although there will be knuckleheads who do not follow directions
Jan 11, 2016 07:03:05 #
SteveR wrote:
Consider two cameras so you don't have to switch lenses.
Excellent advice. Rent one.
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.