Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main Photography Discussion
Pixma Pro 1, 10, or 100?
Page <<first <prev 3 of 3
Jun 2, 2015 16:33:12   #
bsprague Loc: Lacey, WA, USA
 
jmcgloth wrote:
The Pro-1 is a nice printer. I have one I would like to sell, as I have graduated to an Epson 3880.
Those both use cartridges so big that they make no sense to anyone who does not print at least a few times or more every day.

Reply
Jun 2, 2015 22:20:18   #
planepics Loc: St. Louis burbs, but originally Chicago burbs
 
I have the Pro-100 and love it! Much better B/W and great color compared to my old printer...twice as many cartridges as well, which probably make the difference. I still use the old one to copy and scan though. Ink gets pricy. I bought a full replacement of ink tanks from Adorama for $100, but that was cheaper than individual tanks.

Reply
Jun 4, 2015 22:47:09   #
Chelli
 
Photographer Jim wrote:
Major difference is that the Pro 10 and the Pro 1 use pigment inks while the Pro 100 uses dye inks. The pigment ink printers have more black and grey inks. There are differences in wireless connections as well, but you can look those up when you look at reviews. The Pro 1 uses bigger ink cartridges than the Pro 10. All produce very good prints. If you are just printing for yourself, the Pro 100 is a very good printer for a good price, especially when Canon offers it on one of its rebate deals. The Pro 10 or Pro 1 using pigment inks, is a good choice if you sell prints or enter a lot of competitions, or simply want better archival life for your prints.
Major difference is that the Pro 10 and the Pro 1 ... (show quote)


Which would you suggest - Pixma Pro 10 or the Epson R3000, Jim?

Reply
 
 
Jun 4, 2015 23:01:52   #
Photographer Jim Loc: Rio Vista, CA
 
Chelli wrote:
Which would you suggest - Pixma Pro 10 or the Epson R3000, Jim?


It wouldn't be fair for me to make a recommendation, as I have no hands on experience with Epson printers. I started out with a Canon 9000, but switched to the 9500 Mkll when I decided to start selling my work and wanted pigment ink prints. I later added a 24 inch wide Canon ProGraf 6400 for larger prints. I stayed with Canon because I wanted all of my prints to continue to use the same ink set, and I was already used to the Canon printer interface. You can understand, I'm sure, that I have a bias toward the Canon printer.

I can say that a friend who also sells his work uses large Epson printers and they seem to do a great job, and the R3000 has certainly garnered its share of positive reviews.

Reply
Jun 5, 2015 01:57:25   #
SharpShooter Loc: NorCal
 
Chelli wrote:
Which would you suggest - Pixma Pro 10 or the Epson R3000, Jim?


Chelli, I'll give you my opinion. I am not familiar with the 3000, nor have I used either the Canon 100/10. But the 3000 is probably similar to the bigger Epsons. I've used the 3800 and mostly the 3880's. I'll tell you why I don't own one. First the Epsens are very good printers, as are all good printers.
What Epson has NOT been able to solve is the ink switching from black to matte black. Yes the newer ones have both tanks installed but still have to completely purge the line to make the switch as they use the same nozzles for both colors.
My first real printer was an Epson 2200 but I will not consider another Epson till that is solved.
The other thing that I don't like about Epson is that they seem to print dark. So I always seem to have to make one test print first to adjust the brightness which is a real hassle. Is it isolated? At school I've used 6 different 3880's and a few 3800's and they are all the same. Both the printers and the monitors are calibrated once per week.
The Canons don't have the ink switching problem and the 10 has an optimizing clear coat that fills the gaps between ink droplets which minimizes bronzing.
And if you happen to shoot Canon there can be some printer compatibility advantages.
As far as printing goes, I'm sure you can't tell a difference in print quality between the two brands. Just my personal experience. ;-)
SS

Reply
Jun 5, 2015 03:44:03   #
Chelli
 
Photographer Jim wrote:
It wouldn't be fair for me to make a recommendation, as I have no hands on experience with Epson printers. I started out with a Canon 9000, but switched to the 9500 Mkll when I decided to start selling my work and wanted pigment ink prints. I later added a 24 inch wide Canon ProGraf 6400 for larger prints. I stayed with Canon because I wanted all of my prints to continue to use the same ink set, and I was already used to the Canon printer interface. You can understand, I'm sure, that I have a bias toward the Canon printer.

I can say that a friend who also sells his work uses large Epson printers and they seem to do a great job, and the R3000 has certainly garnered its share of positive reviews.
It wouldn't be fair for me to make a recommendatio... (show quote)



Thank you, Jim.

Reply
Jun 5, 2015 03:44:41   #
Chelli
 
SharpShooter wrote:
Chelli, I'll give you my opinion. I am not familiar with the 3000, nor have I used either the Canon 100/10. But the 3000 is probably similar to the bigger Epsons. I've used the 3800 and mostly the 3880's. I'll tell you why I don't own one. First the Epsens are very good printers, as are all good printers.
What Epson has NOT been able to solve is the ink switching from black to matte black. Yes the newer ones have both tanks installed but still have to completely purge the line to make the switch as they use the same nozzles for both colors.
My first real printer was an Epson 2200 but I will not consider another Epson till that is solved.
The other thing that I don't like about Epson is that they seem to print dark. So I always seem to have to make one test print first to adjust the brightness which is a real hassle. Is it isolated? At school I've used 6 different 3880's and a few 3800's and they are all the same. Both the printers and the monitors are calibrated once per week.
The Canons don't have the ink switching problem and the 10 has an optimizing clear coat that fills the gaps between ink droplets which minimizes bronzing.
And if you happen to shoot Canon there can be some printer compatibility advantages.
As far as printing goes, I'm sure you can't tell a difference in print quality between the two brands. Just my personal experience. ;-)
SS
Chelli, I'll give you my opinion. I am not familia... (show quote)


Thank you, SS.

Reply
Page <<first <prev 3 of 3
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.