Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register ☰
Main Photography Discussion
Undecided on choice of D7200 and D610
Page <<first <prev 3 of 4 next>
Apr 8, 2015 09:12:25   #
drmarty Loc: Pine City, NY
 
catfish252 wrote:
Look at some of the models the major brands have to offer, read some reviews, and go to flickr and search for photos taken by those cameras. They all take some awesome pictures nowadays. The new Nikon P900 that was announced 2 weeks ago has a 24 to 2000mm (83X) zoom optically and I believe a 2x electronic doubler, plus it will fit in the wife's purse. I'm sure other brands have comparable specs. If you are going to go dslr I'd go D7100 you can get refurb or real deals on new ones since the D7200 has come out. The D7100 is as nice capable today as the D90 was in its day -- it's a very solid camera -- one of the best Nikon has ever made.
Look at some of the models the major brands have t... (show quote)


:thumbup:

Reply
Apr 8, 2015 09:38:20   #
ottopj Loc: Annapolis, MD USA
 
hollis wrote:
To follow up on catfish252 - I do not have a dslr and lens at the moment. Had a D90 a awhile ago and sold it


Possibly consider the Nikon D3300 and lens kit, $500, and you're done!

See Ken Rockwell (some like him some don't) review:
http://www.kenrockwell.com/nikon/d3300.htm

Reply
Apr 8, 2015 09:44:21   #
SteveR Loc: Michigan
 
Fishnwish wrote:
Hi Hollis,
I own a D7100- beware of optical viewfindefer light-leak (beyond other models) and a lot of noise even at ISO100.
If you want resolution and are a casual photographer, D5500 or D3300. All the buffer speeds and frame rates of the D7200 probably won't be used.
If you're thinking of a lot of low-light use and seriously staying with photography the D610 will save you money in the long run.
If money is no object then go D7200 or D750 for the cool bells and whistles.

All camera salesmen tactics are based on under selling because if you're trully interested you'll be back for that next biggest sensor, aperture or focal length. So beware that tactic!

Lastly, here is a link to DXO Mark Labs website. They lay out the camera comparisons side by side. They are THE premier data provider for all photography equipment articles. Please note that they have an ad for their software on this link, you have to click the continue to site link.

http://www.dxomark.com/Cameras/Ratings

Good luck in your endeavors!
Paul
Hi Hollis, br I own a D7100- beware of optical vie... (show quote)


Noise at ISO100? BS The D7000 was known as a good lowlight camera when it came out and the D7100 is an improvement on the D7000.

Reply
 
 
Apr 8, 2015 09:46:23   #
SteveR Loc: Michigan
 
Edmund Dworakowski wrote:
If money is at all an issue, or even if it's not, I recommend purchasing a refurbished D7100 or D800/800e directly from Nikon. Refirbs. are as good as new, and if you look at the specs., the D7200 offers nothing over the 7200. Nikon does loyal customers a disservice by "upgrading" current models with inferior products with meaningless "improvements" just to pick our pockets. I got tired of Nikon releasing an upgrade of my beloved D300s and decided to keep it, and purchase a most excellent factory refurbished D800 for less than a plastic D750 which had just come out. I not only wound up with a superior camera, but I gained the satisfaction of beating Nikon at their own game. I'd go REFIRB or go Olympus or Canon.
If money is at all an issue, or even if it's not, ... (show quote)


Don't go with t he 800 series if you're not a serious photographer. The focus selector in the back is totally different and much more of a pain compared to the D7000 series.

I would recommend the Nikon 28-300mm lens to go with the D7100. For wide angle purposes, a 10-24mm.

Reply
Apr 8, 2015 09:54:10   #
hollis
 
Ed - any thought/s on the D610

Reply
Apr 8, 2015 10:01:17   #
hollis
 
Thanks Paul - I take your suggestion with a grain of salt.
Ray

Reply
Apr 8, 2015 10:10:09   #
jgitomer Loc: Skippack Pennsylvania
 
Although I have an FX Nikon based on your description of how you plan on using your new camera I think you would be best served with a DX Nikon.

Given your low usage I suggest a factory refurbished D7100 which you can purchase either directly from Nikon or from an authorized dealer and a lens in the 18-250 or 18-300 range.

You can save some money by purchasing an older Nikor Autofocus lens (AF or AF-d) from a reputable dealer since the D7100 has a focus motor built into the body.

Jerry

Reply
 
 
Apr 8, 2015 10:22:13   #
Fishnwish
 
Hi SteveR,
Yep, noise at ISO100! I also owned the D7000 and sold it after buying the D7100. That was the biggest mistake of my life!

Here's a few articles and forum posts about it...

https://www.flickr.com/groups/nikond7100/discuss/72157639084358976/

http://www.dpreview.com/forums/post/51961552

http://submit.shutterstock.com/forum/abt132317.html

http://forums.whirlpool.net.au/archive/2160219

Reply
Apr 8, 2015 10:51:55   #
burkphoto Loc: High Point, NC
 
hollis wrote:
Hello all - I have been pondering on deciding whether to buy a Nikon D7200 or D610 Camera. I do understand that the D610 is full frame camera but I understand the new D7200 has some features which can make it interesting. The camera would be for general interest, especially when going on vacation or cruises. I would some opinions from fellow hoggers. Regards


If you have no Nikon glass at the moment, look at the Panasonic LUMIX GH4. It's MUCH smaller and lighter than a dSLR, and has image quality that rivals the D7200. It also records phenomenal 1080P and 4K video. A HUGE array of lenses are available from Panasonic, Leica, Olympus, and others, and you can adapt almost any lens line to it with the right adapter.

Many pros are using this camera to produce hybrid projects (linked products containing video, audio, stills, text, and graphics) for the web.

Reply
Apr 8, 2015 13:18:36   #
Impressionist
 
I have had the new D7200 for a couple of weeks and am very pleased with it. The buffer size difference between it and the D7100 makes a big enough difference when buying a first Nikon. May not be big enough were it an upgrade but for a first it is. Nature and differing events can present situations where the buffer could come into play. Similar over all full frame specs start with the D750.

Reply
Apr 8, 2015 14:03:04   #
bonjac Loc: Santa Ynez, CA 93460
 
hollis wrote:
bkyser - I figure in a low light situation one can use a flash but your thought and suggestion is acceptable.


But another thought. The improvement in signal processing has really changed low light equipment considerations. Images are now routinely taken at ISOs far in excess of what was possible just a few years ago with very good results. So, it seems to me the argument for FF for low light is not so significant as it might have been. Just a thought.

Reply
 
 
Apr 8, 2015 15:05:37   #
hollis
 
Thanks Bill
Ray

Reply
Apr 8, 2015 15:06:09   #
hollis
 
Thanks for the insight
Ray

Reply
Apr 8, 2015 15:13:38   #
Gobuster Loc: South Florida
 
hollis wrote:
Ed - any thought/s on the D610


The D610 is highly rated and is an excellent buy in a full frame camera. It is very similar to the D7100 in layout and controls. I have one and am delighted with the IQ and handling. Coupled with 28-300 and 16-35 zooms you cover a wide range with only 2 lenses. You can always add specialty lenses as needed or wanted!

Reply
Apr 8, 2015 15:25:20   #
hollis
 
thanks for your follow upmon the 610

Reply
Page <<first <prev 3 of 4 next>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main Photography Discussion
Home | Latest Digest | Back to Top | All Sections
Contact us | Privacy policy | Terms of use | DMCA
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.