I'm a big fan of refurbished cameras - now on my third one and no problems ever - at least with Nikons and going back to film days.
Nosaj wrote:
Your comment is very helpful and I appreciate it. I realize the difference in sensors, yet I'm constrained by budget, so I've been trying to determine what model under $500 would be best for me based on the criteria I set. If budget was not an issue, my first choice could be the GX-1 mk II, but that's almost double the cost of the G16. And, since most of my "serious" photography is done with my Pentax K3 (an truly outstanding DSLR), I have to keep the cost of a casual P&S within bounds.
Your comment is very helpful and I appreciate it. ... (
show quote)
Should be able to pick up G1X for 499...or if you can refurb 349 until 3/31 Canon 1 year.G1X has the large sensor. Can see my post is redundant now sorry
I use a Canon G15 and SX60, depending on lighting and lens considerations. Both are exelent.
Nosaj wrote:
Good point. But as you know, when someone asks for camera suggestions, the responses keep coming. Some of the input has been helpful, as you say, but some has not. My criteria were specific, yet I received replies that were outside of that criteria. For example, I'm not interested in mega zoom. I want a viewfinder. etc. It looks that my two choices are the Canon G16 and the Fuji X30 (both under $500). If a new Nikon P7800 was under $500 (NOT a refurbished one), it could be a first choice.
I have just returned from the lake where i adjust fishing lures and I took some pictures with my Canon G10, Hope you dont mind me showing you some I don't see how they could be much better. Hope this helps you.
Nosaj
Loc: Sarasota, Florida
Wesso wrote:
I have just returned from the lake where i adjust fishing lures and I took some pictures with my Canon G10, Hope you dont mind me showing you some I don't see how they could be much better. Hope this helps you.
Normally, I don't want shots posted on my thread, except for when I'm asking for opinions on different camera. The shots you posted are very similar to the shots I got from my Canon G9, which is damaged beyond repair and now trying to replace. The major advantage of the Nikon P7800 for me is the auto panorama feature, but the cost is about $100 more.
Nosaj
Loc: Sarasota, Florida
Wesso wrote:
Sorry just delete them.
Your shots are quite OK: this thread is based on my requesting opinions and your images very well support your opinion, and I thank you for them. Its only when I post images in the Photo gallery that I don't want others to post their own images.
Nosaj
Loc: Sarasota, Florida
Wesso wrote:
Most everyone, with a few exceptions on these forums are a bunch of sissy snobs. Don't be a cheap ass, just go buy a damn camera. It's no rocket sience. What you want you don't want to pay for it. Have tried to be nice but you can stick your thread up your ass
I said I was OK with your posting pictures on an opinion thread. I even thanked you for them. So, what's your problem! You need to take your venom to The Attic!
Nosaj wrote:
I said I was OK with your posting pictures on an opinion thread. I even thanked you for them. So, what's your problem! You need to take your venom to The Attic!
I don't need to do nothing, you and the Forum Nazi's can go to Hell, I went to a lot of trouble to take those pictures, what a bunch of crybabies. Wahhh! Don't post on my thread Wahhh! 👆👆👆
Nosaj
Loc: Sarasota, Florida
Wesso wrote:
I don't need to do nothing, you and the Forum Nazi's can go to Hell, I went to a lot of trouble to take those pictures, what a bunch of crybabies. Wahhh! Don't post on my thread Wahhh! 👆👆👆
What a piece of work. Don't reply back, it will be deleted unread!
i use the Fujifilm x100s and love it. i agree the FFx100t is also outstanding, but there are some wonderful comparable cameras. i would go rent several before you make your decision. good luck.
Just to add to the choices, I have owned a Panasonic Lumix-FZ50 for about 6 or so yrs., (this model is not made any more). I bought it because of the lens maker, but every part of this camera is good quality and useful features, like RAW, RAW + JPEG, JPEG, and most all of the features found on a DSLR. Todays Panasonic Lumix cameras are very good quality and features. And the photographs it has produced are excellent quality. To have a compact camera with a F2.8 lens from 28mm. to 600mm. is a VERY useful camera. You SHOULD look at some and consider one. Of course a new DSLR, like my Sony A77, have features and quality that is hard to match. But your wanting a camera that is not as expensive and will do most of the time. And you won't need any other lenses to carry, change, and then get dirt onto the sensor.
Give a Panasonic Lumix a try. I'll bet you will not be disappointed.
nice shots....would love to be there now with my boxer
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.