Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
The Attic
The Hydroplate Theory - The Flood
Page <prev 2 of 5 next> last>>
Dec 15, 2014 18:58:40   #
user47602 Loc: ip 304.0.0.33.32
 
where did all that water go? ... the underground ocean doesn't even begin to account for it.... LOL have a nice day :)

Reply
Dec 15, 2014 19:04:51   #
skylane5sp Loc: Puyallup, WA
 
.



Reply
Dec 15, 2014 19:04:57   #
Racmanaz Loc: Sunny Tucson!
 
user47602 wrote:
where did all that water go? ... the underground ocean doesn't even begin to account for it.... LOL have a nice day :)


If you watched the video you would know where it went......give it your best guess lol

Reply
 
 
Dec 15, 2014 19:08:52   #
Racmanaz Loc: Sunny Tucson!
 
skylane5sp wrote:
.


Actually you are wrong, I would venture to say that most Christians weren't Christians at a younger age. I wasn't one till later in life and I believed in evolution, so my ears are not shut. You atheists can't say the same thing, you are exactly what you accuse Christians off, deaf to any other "theories". You have blinded yourself from anything but what you already set yourself to believe in.....YOU are blind.

Reply
Dec 15, 2014 19:11:27   #
skylane5sp Loc: Puyallup, WA
 
You have it all wrong! Here is the truth... I think? Makes about as much sense.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NG2utrMwTyY

Reply
Dec 15, 2014 19:21:59   #
Racmanaz Loc: Sunny Tucson!
 
slocumeddie wrote:
Rac, I know you have a much better knowledge of science than I do. I know this because you told me so.....But I must protest your latest post.

Walt Brown's theory was fiction 25 years ago. Nothing has changed. He has no training in any field except mechanical engineering.

Geology, hydrology, seismology, astronomy, and other earth sciences are not in his background. The details of his theory are downright silly.

His work is rejected by mainstream scientific establishments. He is rejected by most other creationist organizations. His "Center for Scientific Creation"

currently has one participating member.....Walt Brown. His book, "In the Beginning: Compelling Evidence for Creation and the Flood" was self published.

His greatest achievement has been his inclusion in the Encyclopedia of American Loons. The conclusion they arrived at follows:

"Babbling beefhead and denialist whose main techniques are, as one would expect, ignorance, misrepresentation, goddidit, and – if everything else fails –

appeal to ”worldviews”. He may not be the most influential creationist out there, but is often pulled out by the densest members of the creationist movement

and probably does have some negative impact on the world."
Their review can be found here:http://americanloons.blogspot.com/2013/05/537-walt-brown.html

Amen
Rac, I know you have a much better knowledge of sc... (show quote)


Actually at least a couple of his predictions have come to pass and are true, they were discovered by main steam scientists. Does not matter if the main stream scientific community rejects it, there has been many theories and ideas that have been rejected by the MSSC and yet was found to be true later. If we always listened to everything the mainstream scientific community rejected we would not advance as much as we should. I don't care much about the mainstream Scientific community as much as I care about the TRUTH, there has been way too many errors and misrepresentations from the MSSC.
Here is one of his proven prediction that has been verified.
http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2007/03/070301103112.htm

Reply
Dec 15, 2014 19:24:17   #
Racmanaz Loc: Sunny Tucson!
 
skylane5sp wrote:
You have it all wrong! Here is the truth... I think? Makes about as much sense.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NG2utrMwTyY


So you are just an empty cymbal banging away and have nothing of value to contribute?

Reply
 
 
Dec 15, 2014 19:26:28   #
user47602 Loc: ip 304.0.0.33.32
 
Racmanaz wrote:
If you watched the video you would know where it went......give it your best guess lol


ummmm GOD was thirsty? :mrgreen:

Reply
Dec 15, 2014 19:30:14   #
Racmanaz Loc: Sunny Tucson!
 
user47602 wrote:
ummmm GOD was thirsty? :mrgreen:


I can see you are just being childish as usual because you have no viable refutation. You are ignored till you are serious about this theory. :)

Reply
Dec 15, 2014 19:31:32   #
Keenan Loc: Central Coast California
 
Racmanaz wrote:
I can see you are just being childish as usual because you have no viable refutation. You are ignored till you are serious about this theory. :)


Rac, do you believe that the earth is only 10,000 years old or less?

Reply
Dec 15, 2014 19:37:32   #
OldDoc Loc: New York
 
Racmanaz wrote:
That's all you have to say??? nothing to refute this?? You know he has predicted at least two things about this theory that were found to be true years later. He predicted that there would be oceans of water under the crust about deep or so......that has been confirmed by scientists. He also predicted that there would be missing Earths crust in the Atlantic ocean.........that has been confirmed back in 2007.


Actually, what has been shown by working scientists is that there is water bound up in an unusual mineral called ringwoodite about 225-400 miles below the crust. This is very different from flowing water as in an ocean.

Reply
 
 
Dec 15, 2014 19:40:07   #
Racmanaz Loc: Sunny Tucson!
 
Keenan wrote:
Rac, do you believe that the earth is only 10,000 years old or less?


I really hold no solid belief on how old this Earth is, I just don't know. It could be millions or it could be much less. There are Creationists that believe the Earth is only 6,000-10,000 years old and there's a few that believe it's 4.6 millions years old as does Astrophysicist Hugh Ross. I listen to both sides with their evidences, I actually bought one of Hugh Ross's book the other day.

Reply
Dec 15, 2014 19:42:16   #
Keenan Loc: Central Coast California
 
Racmanaz wrote:
I really hold no solid belief on how old this Earth is, I just don't know. It could be millions or it could be much less. There are Creationists that believe the Earth is only 6,000-10,000 years old and there's a few that believe it's 4.6 millions years old as does Astrophysicist Hugh Ross. I listen to both sides with their evidences, I actually bought one of Hugh Ross's book the other day.


So, what you are saying is that you believe that the Earth very well could be only 10,000 years old? :shock: :shock: :shock: :shock: :shock:

Reply
Dec 15, 2014 19:42:19   #
user47602 Loc: ip 304.0.0.33.32
 
Racmanaz wrote:
I can see you are just being childish as usual because you have no viable refutation. You are ignored till you are serious about this theory. :)


LOL actually not... using the most basic physics and math, that volume of water had nowhere to recede to...

so you will be the child by saying that is not proof of the truth and you will weasel around with your pseudo-science until you're corenred and then you will say God did it because he's GOD...

you actually have no idea... maybe he was very thirsty, wiping out a whole world is not easy. LOL

Reply
Dec 15, 2014 19:44:42   #
Racmanaz Loc: Sunny Tucson!
 
Keenan wrote:
So, what you are saying is that you believe that the Earth very well could be only 10,000 years old? :shock: :shock: :shock: :shock: :shock:


Oh sure it could be, whether it is I do not know. But it could also be millions or even thousands. <shrugs>

Reply
Page <prev 2 of 5 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
The Attic
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.