The Hydroplate Theory - The Flood: Very interesting point of view, we shall see how it turns out when more evidence either supports it or not. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sD9ZGt9UA-U...

Racmanaz Loc: Sunny Tucson!

Very interesting point of view, we shall see how it turns out when more evidence either supports it or not.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sD9ZGt9UA-U

user47602 Loc: ip 304.0.0.33.32

not

Racmanaz Loc: Sunny Tucson!

user47602 wrote:

not

Can you refute it with evidence??? he does have archaeological evidence and he even predicted scientist would find massive water under the crust, and guess what they have and he was correct.

user47602 Loc: ip 304.0.0.33.32

Racmanaz wrote:

Can you refute it with evidence??? he does have archaeological evidence and he even predicted scientist would find massive water under the crust, and guess what they have and he was correct.

pick any 2 :mrgreen:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_sD_7rxYoZY

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FfSvktyxVYA

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EIa8Yhy06DU

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7QJ7yZ9L1po

Racmanaz Loc: Sunny Tucson!

user47602 wrote:

pick any 2 :mrgreen:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_sD_7rxYoZY

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FfSvktyxVYA

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EIa8Yhy06DU

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7QJ7yZ9L1po

Thats' not evidence, those are videos.

user47602 Loc: ip 304.0.0.33.32

the last one provides a mathematical analysis of the amount of water needed to make the Bible story work... it's geometry and algebra, pretty simple, and pretty bulletproof...

Racmanaz Loc: Sunny Tucson!

user47602 wrote:

the last one provides a mathematical analysis of the amount of water needed to make the Bible story work... it's geometry and algebra, pretty simple, and pretty bulletproof...

Wrong again, that does not refute the Hydro-plate theory at all, you didn't even watch the video to see what was said lol

Racmanaz Loc: Sunny Tucson!

user47602 wrote:

the last one provides a mathematical analysis of the amount of water needed to make the Bible story work... it's geometry and algebra, pretty simple, and pretty bulletproof...

LOL That last one does not even come close to what is involved the Hydroplate theory. He also forgets about the water canopy above the Earth as well which is biblical, and he also forgets about the waters under ground and the fountains under the deep ocean. Try and at least watch the video I posted before trying to refute it, you are only making yourself look silly lol.

user47602 Loc: ip 304.0.0.33.32

don't worry, Rac... I know your are already cast in stone..LOL

LOL< but please don't ask me to sit through 10 minutes of religious science fiction....

LOL The grand canyon was carved in just a few weeks! LOL :roll:

Racmanaz Loc: Sunny Tucson!

user47602 wrote:

don't worry, Rac... I know your are already cast in stone..LOL

LOL< but please don't ask me to sit through 10 minutes of religious science fiction....

LOL The grand canyon was carved in just a few weeks! LOL :roll:

You are right, I once was cast in the quick sand of evolution but now I am cast in stone who is Jesus! Hey if you don't want to watch the vidoes then why are you trying to refute what you don't even know is in there???

slocumeddie Loc: Inside your head, again

Racmanaz wrote:

Very interesting point of view, we shall see how it turns out when more evidence either supports it or not.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sD9ZGt9UA-U

Rac, I know you have a much better knowledge of science than I do. I know this because you told me so.....But I must protest your latest post.

Walt Brown's theory was fiction 25 years ago. Nothing has changed. He has no training in any field except mechanical engineering.

Geology, hydrology, seismology, astronomy, and other earth sciences are not in his background. The details of his theory are downright silly.

His work is rejected by mainstream scientific establishments. He is rejected by most other creationist organizations. His "Center for Scientific Creation"

currently has one participating member.....Walt Brown. His book, "In the Beginning: Compelling Evidence for Creation and the Flood" was self published.

His greatest achievement has been his inclusion in the Encyclopedia of American Loons. The conclusion they arrived at follows:

"Babbling beefhead and denialist whose main techniques are, as one would expect, ignorance, misrepresentation, goddidit, and if everything else fails

appeal to worldviews. He may not be the most influential creationist out there, but is often pulled out by the densest members of the creationist movement

and probably does have some negative impact on the world." Their review can be found here:http://americanloons.blogspot.com/2013/05/537-walt-brown.html

Amen

silver Loc: Santa Monica Ca.

Racmanaz wrote:

Very interesting point of view, we shall see how it turns out when more evidence either supports it or not.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sD9ZGt9UA-U

Total lunacy. Evidence, there is none.

Racmanaz Loc: Sunny Tucson!

So nobody cares to challenge the theory with opposing evidence against this? I'm not saying that I subscribe to this theory in it's entirety, I would be open to actual facts that support it and that does not support some aspects of this theory.

Keenan Loc: Central Coast California

Racmanaz wrote:

So nobody cares to challenge the theory with opposing evidence against this? I'm not saying that I subscribe to this theory in it's entirety, I would be open to actual facts that support it and that does not support some aspects of this theory.

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!

Racmanaz Loc: Sunny Tucson!

Keenan wrote:

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!

That's all you have to say??? nothing to refute this?? You know he has predicted at least two things about this theory that were found to be true years later. He predicted that there would be oceans of water under the crust about 10 miles deep or so......that has been confirmed by scientists. He also predicted that there would be missing Earths crust in the Atlantic ocean.........that has been confirmed back in 2007.