Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main Photography Discussion
what company is best for glass
Page <prev 2 of 5 next> last>>
Sep 2, 2014 21:53:38   #
joer Loc: Colorado/Illinois
 
rayophotos wrote:
I'm looking to purchase a new piece of glass but I don't know if I should stick with CANON or move on to SIGMA for glass....im looking for a good 70-300mm any suggestions


Go to DXOMark and compare the different brands to see which is the best then make your choice based on what available within your budget.

Reply
Sep 2, 2014 22:46:28   #
Peterff Loc: O'er The Hills and Far Away, in Themyscira.
 
Mitch35 wrote:
I have the canon 70-300 (approx$650 new) I bought from canon refurb (about $365) and love it. Sharp focus and not too heavy. Highly recommend!


It is a well recommended lens, I certainly have no problems with mine, which I acquired used on ebay...

Good luck

Reply
Sep 3, 2014 05:21:52   #
RWR Loc: La Mesa, CA
 
rayophotos wrote:
I'm looking to purchase a new piece of glass but I don't know if I should stick with CANON or move on to SIGMA for glass....im looking for a good 70-300mm any suggestions


This Sigma is one of the best for the money:

http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/391074-REG/Sigma_508101_70_300mm_f_4_5_6_APO_M_DG.html

Reply
 
 
Sep 3, 2014 05:46:35   #
oldmalky Loc: West Midlands,England.
 
I bought the Tamron 70-300 used for about £100

Reply
Sep 3, 2014 06:17:26   #
Gene51 Loc: Yonkers, NY, now in LSD (LowerSlowerDelaware)
 
rayophotos wrote:
Not the L. Don't got that type of cash


The other companies, including Nikon, do not make a lens that packs as much value and utility and image quality as this lens:

http://www.photozone.de/reviews/200-canon-ef-70-300mm-f4-56-usm-is-test-report--review?start=2

It should be your only consideration.

Reply
Sep 3, 2014 06:18:36   #
Gene51 Loc: Yonkers, NY, now in LSD (LowerSlowerDelaware)
 
imagemeister wrote:
Tamron SP 70-300 VC .....for the price !


For the same price, the Canon is better.

Reply
Sep 3, 2014 06:22:51   #
jerryc41 Loc: Catskill Mts of NY
 
rayophotos wrote:
I'm looking to purchase a new piece of glass but I don't know if I should stick with CANON or move on to SIGMA for glass....im looking for a good 70-300mm any suggestions

In a case like that, I always read reviews, as many as I can find. One lens is going to cost more than the other, and you have to ask yourself what you are getting for the extra cost. Sigma isn't your only alternative. Tamron has been coming on strong with new lenses.

I like all the lenses I have, so I would recommend them, but maybe I could have done just as well, or better, for less money. Reviewers go through lots of equipment, so they can see differences that a person with one lens cannot.

Reply
 
 
Sep 3, 2014 06:24:11   #
jerryc41 Loc: Catskill Mts of NY
 
joer wrote:
Go to DXOMark and compare the different brands to see which is the best then make your choice based on what available within your budget.

Good suggestion. When you select the lenses, you can also select the camera you will be using. That makes a difference in their ratings.

Reply
Sep 3, 2014 07:01:56   #
queencitysanta Loc: Charlotte, North Carolina
 
Buy Nikon glass and end all your worries..

Reply
Sep 3, 2014 08:19:00   #
Bear2 Loc: Southeast,, MI
 
Nikon

rayophotos wrote:
I'm looking to purchase a new piece of glass but I don't know if I should stick with CANON or move on to SIGMA for glass....im looking for a good 70-300mm any suggestions

Reply
Sep 3, 2014 08:49:06   #
Blurryeyed Loc: NC Mountains.
 
rayophotos wrote:
Thinking 70-300mm f/4-5.6 IS USM


I have that lens, and it is very good up to 200mm or so but there is a loss in performance as you go to 300mm. I don't know if you have read reviews on the lens, I assume that you have but it reviews quite well. One thing that is odd about that lens is that the front glass turns on focus which makes using a CPL difficult, especially if you are using a lens hood which I recommend.

From Photozone test report....

Quote:
As hinted in the introduction the lens features an UD (ultra-low dispersion) element which is quite unusual for a consumer grade Canon lens. This special kind of glass is usually only used in Canon L (professional grade) lenses.

In the lab the effect of the new design became pretty obvious with surprisingly high resolution figures throughout the range. In fact the data was so impressive that I was already wondering whether I had mixed up the RAW files with a (supposedly) better lens.

The lens produced very good to excellent MTF figures. As to be expected the performance is best at 70mm with excellent center and border quality at all tested apertures. At 200mm and a little more so at 300mm there's a slight decrease in resolution but the results stay easily within very good territory reaching even excellent center figures at the respective performance peaks. Compared to true L grade lenses the contrast level seems to be a tad lower at 300mm. Nonetheless this is truly baffling for such an affordable lens.
As hinted in the introduction the lens features an... (show quote)

Reply
 
 
Sep 3, 2014 08:58:40   #
mikedidi46 Loc: WINTER SPRINGS, FLORIDA
 
I bought the Sigma 70-300mm, DG, OS and I love it. I am getting wonderful results on my 70D.

Reply
Sep 3, 2014 09:52:26   #
cjc2 Loc: Hellertown PA
 
Not a fan of Sigma. Stick to Canon or try Tamron. My $.02.

Reply
Sep 3, 2014 10:10:43   #
sumo Loc: Houston suburb
 
I am a big fan of Riedel Glass...
I know a SA answer...but just couldn't help it

Reply
Sep 3, 2014 10:29:24   #
imagemeister Loc: mid east Florida
 
Gene51 wrote:
For the same price, the Canon is better.


Go here - http://www.photozone.de/canon-eos/592-tamron70300f456vceosapsc?start=1 - and scroll down to the last paragraph ......

Reply
Page <prev 2 of 5 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.