Yet another one, Racmataz? This one is particularly poor. It consists of a series of a superficial and incomplete description of DNA accompanied by some unsupported assertions about how this proves there must be a god/creator. But it's baloney. One example - the assertion is made that one of the "laws of information" is that all information must originate from a mind. So I tried googling the "laws of information". My first hit was an interesting article about some important principles involved in the design of information systems. No mention in there anywhere about the need for a mind to originate information. There were some links to items covering the law as it applies to information and one to an article on Murphy's Law, which is really a humorous comment on how things can go wrong and irrelevant to this topic. Then there were a number of hits which related to or were linked to a creationist website, which eventually took me to a page where some "laws of information" were outlined. This was, itself on a creationist website. In other words, the origin for this claim came from within "creation science" itself. Basically, they are just making it up and passing it off as "science".
Racmanaz, you are entitled to believe what you want, however much it flies in the face of the evidence. Once you try to pretend that there is a valid scientific basis for that belief, you are open to challenge. These videos you keep presenting are, as far as I can see, nonsense. Not that everything in them is nonsense, but the way that fact is mixed with non-fact, the way that facts are presented selectively, the way that unsupported claims about facts are made and the conclusions that are drawn from them are pure hogwash. If ever there were a case of garbage in-garbage out, it's "creation science".

Recently there have been lots of threads started claiming to prove the existence of god so it's reasonable to expect people to counter that view if theirs is different.

How many recent threads have been started claiming the opposite?

As I see it the believers are trying to push their view which is the main thing I oppose. I have no problem at all with those who choose to believe but please don't try and get me to believe it with your preaching. I know where my local churches are the same as I know my local pubs, if I want a drink I go to the pub. Pity religion doesn't work the same.