Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main Photography Discussion
What monitor do you use for photo editing?
Page <<first <prev 4 of 4
Aug 3, 2014 17:42:53   #
tradergeorge Loc: Newport, Kentucky
 
Racmanaz wrote:
I'm looking up each monitor as it is posted by everyone, thank you all for your help.


Just about any modern monitor can be calibrated to be withing the detectable range. I use a reference print from each of my cameras printed out on the printer I am using. I then use a calibrator to match my screen output to the reference photo....Not perfect, but very usable and will usually allow me to see what I will be getting from my printer...

Reply
Aug 3, 2014 18:24:19   #
Racmanaz Loc: Sunny Tucson!
 
I was just at Bestbuy but they did not have many to choose from in store. This is the one I am looking at online right now, what are your thoughts?

http://www.viewsonic.com/us/vx2370smh-led.html

Reply
Aug 3, 2014 21:52:10   #
RedIris Loc: MN, USA
 
right now, I'm using two Samsung 22" 5:4 monitors.

They are great for photo viewing and editing at the same time.

Reply
 
 
Aug 3, 2014 22:40:50   #
Nikon_DonB Loc: Chicago
 
Racmanaz wrote:
I was just at Bestbuy but they did not have many to choose from in store. This is the one I am looking at online right now, what are your thoughts?

http://www.viewsonic.com/us/vx2370smh-led.html


Looks like a decent monitor. Viewsonic has been around a long time. I'd use either the DVI or HDMI interfaces though if your video card will support it.

Reply
Aug 3, 2014 22:44:52   #
Racmanaz Loc: Sunny Tucson!
 
Nikon_DonB wrote:
Looks like a decent monitor. Viewsonic has been around a long time. I'd use either the DVI or HDMI interfaces though if your video card will support it.


My laptop only has HDMI connections, how do I find out if my video card will operate with this monitor?

Reply
Aug 3, 2014 22:49:51   #
loveandpeace Loc: Southeast Iowa
 
SharpShooter wrote:
Digit, Rac was probably kidding, but I wasn't.
Really, I looked at my monitor, it's a chaep little Acer. I measured it, it's almost 20" on the diagonal.
I really do feel that a big monitor is just a waste of space.
For me, the only thing that matters is what goes into my camera, and what goes onto the paper. I try to do and absolute minimum in between those two steps.
I suppose it's a pretty primitive approach, but so far I don't see a need for much else. I have absolutely no problem with the biggest and baddest, I just don't seem to currently have a use for it.
But I see that others are coming forth with a lot of valuable advice, for those that do get into it. ;-)
SS
Digit, Rac was probably kidding, but I wasn't. br... (show quote)


An honest response. When it comes down to it, we behave according to what is in our genes, what we're comfortable with, what does the job for us. In my world, bigger is better, maybe because I'm a child of the 60s, where we worshiped Cinerama, Paragon speakers, Cadillacs. Just because I endorsed my Mac Pro and Dell graphics monitor doesn't mean I believe everyone should rush out and buy them. I know people who happily sail into Photoshop in their tiny 13" Macbooks. We ask for opinions on Ugly Hedgehog, something clicks, and we have our answer. Or maybe we don't . . .

Reply
Aug 3, 2014 23:48:23   #
Gobuster Loc: South Florida
 
SharpShooter wrote:
Rac, you probably don't want to use my monitor.
It was probably $99 on sale, and is probably the smallest size made.
I don't see much value in a monitor.
Do you think that's why my pics are so crappy? I thought it was the camera!! :lol:
SS


It is the camera! No point spending big bucks on a monitor when the camera can't use the better resolution and dynamic range to produce an image! :D :-D

Fun and joke aside, I've seen quite a few monitors that really degrade the quality and sharpness of an image and wonder if some folks blame the camera when, in fact, it is the monitor! I find that having a calibrated, hi res, IPS monitor has really helped me to make better prints by reducing the variance between print and screen.

Reply
 
 
Aug 4, 2014 00:51:53   #
Ernie Misner Loc: Lakewood, WA
 
Get a NEC 27" with Spectraview calibrator unit and you will be set.

Reply
Aug 4, 2014 14:54:25   #
tradergeorge Loc: Newport, Kentucky
 
Ernie Misner wrote:
Get a NEC 27" with Spectraview calibrator unit and you will be set.


I have not used an NEC since the old CRT monitors..Do you have any specs on their later models (or the one you are using)? I have used the SpectraviewII...It seems to work the same as most of the sampling type calibrators. As I said in a previous post, using something like this with a reference print from your printer should give you a good representation of what to expect. If you are just producing for the web, the results are not nearly as critical...

Reply
Aug 4, 2014 15:24:52   #
Nikon_DonB Loc: Chicago
 
Racmanaz wrote:
My laptop only has HDMI connections, how do I find out if my video card will operate with this monitor?


Best Buy is usually pretty cool if you are serious about buying it. Take your laptop to the store and tell the guy in the computer department you want to see if your laptop video will power the monitor. Just grab a HDMI cable at the store, since you will have to buy one anyway. HDMI cables are usually NOT supplied with the monitor. If you have an extra HDMI bring it along.
When you go in Best Buy have the "door man" put a sticker on the laptop that shows it was yours That way it doesn't look like you are trying to "lift" it.
Also that way if you don't like how the Viewsonic looks you can browse around and try another monitor.

Reply
Aug 4, 2014 22:11:31   #
PhotoArtsLA Loc: Boynton Beach
 
Well, my trusted Apple Cinema Display finally died, that is to say, its outboard power supply died, and only used, non-guaranteed power supplies are available... thus it is in search of a new monitor...

So, I do a lot of pre-press, a lot of photo editing, and a lot of video... what to do?

Maybe the NEC MultiSync EA244UHD 23.8" 4K IPS LED Monitor

which has 3840x2160 resolution, 99.3% of Adobe RGB accuracy, 100+% of sRGB accuracy, and important to me, 94.8% accuracy in the NTSC (video) color space.

I was thinking of the Dell Ultrasharp series, because they are fairly cheap and get fairly large, but these do not boast of video (NTSC) color accuracy, just ordinary RGB.

The NEC is the ONLY monitor, short of the $2,500+ range of pro video monitors, which I find speaking of NTSC color accuracy. The Sony color grading monitor I am looking at for Davinci is over $20,000, so the computer monitor needs to be decent, but not at that level.

If anyone has had any experience with this NEC monitor, chime in!

I am stuck with ASUS and Samsung for the time being.

Reply
 
 
Aug 4, 2014 23:36:09   #
marcomarks Loc: Ft. Myers, FL
 
Racmanaz wrote:
I know it's tough trying to view photo's with correct lighting and color with laptop monitors. Do any of you use a separate monitor that has a more accurate representation of colors and lighting/exposures?


I'm using a 23" Acer that I've had for about 4 years but it's not attached to a laptop. It's very accurate and crisp and I didn't need to calibrate it to have excellent results. If I were going out for a monitor today, I'd probably look carefully at the new Samsung monitors which are supposed to be as good or better than an Apple Retina display according to them. If I found that to be true, I'd go with a 27" and move this 23" over to my right side to run two monitors simultaneously which my graphic card can do with ease.

Reply
Page <<first <prev 4 of 4
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.