I know it's tough trying to view photo's with correct lighting and color with laptop monitors. Do any of you use a separate monitor that has a more accurate representation of colors and lighting/exposures?
Regis
Loc: Coeur d' Alene, Idaho
Racmanaz wrote:
I know it's tough trying to view photo's with correct lighting and color with laptop monitors. Do any of you use a separate monitor that has a more accurate representation of colors and lighting/exposures?
I use a 27" Samsung monitor (Costco) which gives me true color representation.
I use a ASUS PA248Q 24-Inch LED-Lit IPS Professional Graphics Monitor. They run about $350 US. I also calibrate every two weeks with a X-Rite ColorMunki.
I use a Dell UltraSharp U3011 30" Monitor, attached to a custom built desktop, and to my Macbook Pro when at home. It's not cheap, but gives true color and a lot of visual real estate for editing.
SonyA580
Loc: FL in the winter & MN in the summer
I use a 21" Acer. I'm not sure the colors are more accurate but they are definitely more repeatable as opposed to a laptop screen. My screen is sync'd with the local Costco printing facility. What I see is what I get.
Regis wrote:
I use a 27" Samsung monitor (Costco) which gives me true color representation.
Dang it, I was just at Costcos after you posted this and forgot to look for it :roll:
Racmanaz wrote:
I know it's tough trying to view photo's with correct lighting and color with laptop monitors. Do any of you use a separate monitor that has a more accurate representation of colors and lighting/exposures?
ASUS 246Q 24.1" P-IPS LCD w/ 98% Adobe RGB
Dave in SD
I use a EIZO ColorEdge CS230 monitor. Recently acquired and it's fab.
I'm looking up each monitor as it is posted by everyone, thank you all for your help.
Racmanaz wrote:
I'm looking up each monitor as it is posted by everyone, thank you all for your help.
Rac, you probably don't want to use my monitor.
It was probably $99 on sale, and is probably the smallest size made.
I don't see much value in a monitor.
Do you think that's why my pics are so crappy? I thought it was the camera!! :lol:
SS
SharpShooter wrote:
Rac, you probably don't want to use my monitor.
It was probably $99 on sale, and is probably the smallest size made.
I don't see much value in a monitor.
Do you think that's why my pics are so crappy? I thought it was the camera!! :lol:
SS
LOL ha ha, naww your pics look just fine, it's my monitor that makes them look crappy ;)
Kentee
Loc: Southern California
I use a 21" Samsung which I have had for several years. It replaced a 19" Samsung which expired after five years. Both give (gave) excellent results.
They come with software which allows you to easily adjust brightness and color. Initially, I had trouble with my prints coming out darker than they looked on the screen (in Photoshop). After much bitter struggle, I figured out that the prints were dark because the screen was too bright! Since then, there is no problem. I reduced the brightness to 80 percent to eliminate the "dark prints" issue.
I like Samsung!
Hey!!! S.S. But really...What monitor do you suppose is a good way to go? Many of us are willing/eager, to hear your take on this. The monitor certainly plays some kind of ROLE in what you/one comes to believe is a good-enough picture to consider for PRINT... I happen to be setting up another Computer/Monitor/keyboard, system to use for photos and video, so I really am in the market for a monitor for a P.C. I use a MAC presently, But it's primarily for my ITUNES music.. What say you S.S. ???
I've been using a VIEWSONIC VP2365-LED wide screen 23" IPS monitor..About $240 on AMAZON.GREAT bang for the buck!..Look up the many user reviews on Amazon's website. I've had to do no monitor calibration whatsoever.Very accurate color..3 year warranty..Excellent screen-to-print match right out of the box!
Eddie (pahtspix)
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.