Photo Processing Debate simple survey
Mar 15, 2014 17:08:06 #
Mar 15, 2014 17:16:38 #
Mar 15, 2014 17:42:21 #
Mar 15, 2014 17:48:19 #
Mar 15, 2014 17:48:20 #
Mar 15, 2014 17:55:49 #
Mar 15, 2014 17:56:42 #
Mar 15, 2014 18:02:55 #
1stJedi wrote:
No, I don't use editing software and I would be happy to compare my work to those using PP techniques.
Talk about being caught with one's pants down. LOL
No, I don't use editing software and I would be happy to compare my work to those using PP techniques.
Bill Houghton wrote:
Talk about being caught with one's pants down. LOL
Mar 15, 2014 18:16:44 #
Ralloh wrote:
1stJedi wrote:
No, I don't use editing software and I would be happy to compare my work to those using PP techniques.
Bill Houghton wrote:
I find this interesting.
http://www.uglyhedgehog.com/t-135758-1.html
Talk about being caught with one's pants down. LOL
No, I don't use editing software and I would be happy to compare my work to those using PP techniques.
Bill Houghton wrote:
I find this interesting.
http://www.uglyhedgehog.com/t-135758-1.html
Talk about being caught with one's pants down. LOL
Ouch!! That's going to leave a mark!! 😬
Mar 15, 2014 18:34:36 #
Mar 15, 2014 18:34:39 #
Mar 15, 2014 18:41:27 #
Mar 15, 2014 18:51:18 #
It will be interesting to see how many/what percentage don't do any pp. I get the sense here that some (many?) take pride that their shots are "straight from the camera".
To me, that means they most likely haven't realized that they're letting the computer chip in their camera process their images - forgoing an awful lot of computing power, precision, and much more flexibility and customization in the bargain, for the relative simplicity and ease of just using what came "straight from the camera".
If you're a photojournalist on a tight deadline, that makes sense. Or if you shoot a very high volume of images, maybe foregoing the time it would require to pp is a good decision.
Otherwise, I believe you're probably shortchanging yourself and what your images could be.
To me, that means they most likely haven't realized that they're letting the computer chip in their camera process their images - forgoing an awful lot of computing power, precision, and much more flexibility and customization in the bargain, for the relative simplicity and ease of just using what came "straight from the camera".
If you're a photojournalist on a tight deadline, that makes sense. Or if you shoot a very high volume of images, maybe foregoing the time it would require to pp is a good decision.
Otherwise, I believe you're probably shortchanging yourself and what your images could be.
Mar 15, 2014 18:52:25 #
Mar 15, 2014 18:54:10 #
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.