Los-Angeles-Shooter wrote:
Aside from being nutty as a fruitcake, Mr. Payne's latest post ignores the reality of how airplanes work and are tracked on radar. The airplane contains a "transponder" which identifies the airplane on radar with its flight number, aircraft type, and other data. There is also a "primary echo" which reflects the size of the aircraft, even if the transponder is disabled. Any landing, pursuant to Mr. Payne's bizarre conjecture, would be shown on radar as the primary target and (if still active) the transponder image disappearing. In addition, there is no evidence from the flight track of any landing at any secret airbase. (Perhaps Mr. Payne believes the secret airbase is also where UFOs and their pilots are stored?)
Incidentally, does Mr. Payne believe that all the investigators and rescue personnel who responded to the Pentagon were killed or otherwise silenced?
Aside from being nutty as a fruitcake, Mr. Payne's... (
show quote)
The transponders were turned off.
The FFA controllers who communicated with the planes and followed them on radar were interviewed and recorded after the attacks. Those tapes were destroyed. Why?
If the perpetrators were going to land the planes at an airbase, do you think they would allow any records to show that. They controlled what records were kept.
Obviously all the investigators and rescue workers worked for the perpetrators and were probably drawn from the military and CIA.
As with the investigation of the WTC implosions, no independent investigators were allowed on the scene.