Check out Film Photography section of our forum.
Bridge vs dslr
Feb 23, 2014 14:50:54 #
Hey Guys I got a question, with all things being equal, if you shoot a Nikon with a 70-200mm on it and another person shoots a bridge camera with the same focal length, what's really going to be the difference? Remind you I said all things are equal, well as much as can be............................fire away........
Feb 23, 2014 15:36:13 #
As an extreme, a Nikon D800 with that 70-200 will kill the smaller sensor of the bridge camera IF you make a largish print. A 4x6 print or an image posted on the internet will not show all that much difference.
If you start throwing in higher ISO images, the larger sensor really makes a big difference.
If you start throwing in higher ISO images, the larger sensor really makes a big difference.
Feb 23, 2014 15:50:55 #
kw charlie wrote:
Hey Guys I got a question, with all things being equal, if you shoot a Nikon with a 70-200mm on it and another person shoots a bridge camera with the same focal length, what's really going to be the difference? Remind you I said all things are equal, well as much as can be............................fire away........
KW, welcome to the Hog.
Your question is almost a trick question. If everything IS equal, there is very little difference. It would depend more on your ultimate goals.
For example, there is very little difference between a $10,000 lens and a $100 lens, if all is equal(see the current discussion on "fast lens". )
But as things get more compromising, the differences start to ad up, one small piece at a time, until the difference is really apparent. Some demand the difference and will only shoot the best, for others it will never make a diff.
I've said this before, one never knows when they will take the best shot they will ever take, and when that happens, I want mine taken with the best IQ I can get. The amount of work is the same, no matter what you take it with.
I think you can answer your own question, for yourself. Or just put on your seatbelt, and, hang on!! :lol:
SS
Check out Landscape Photography section of our forum.
Feb 23, 2014 15:58:10 #
Thanks Captain and ss, both of your opinions I respect. I was just wandering if there was any real visual difference. As you know I just got my D4 and was going to take it out and use one of my bridge cameras to see if there is much of a difference to the eye, all being the same.............then it started to rain so I though I would write you folks with mucho smarts and sort of get an idea what you thaught. Thanks for the time and I am going to try again tomorrow, if it stops raining long enough..............
Feb 23, 2014 16:00:55 #
kw charlie wrote:
Thanks Captain and ss, both of your opinions I res... (show quote)
That would make a good post - similar shots taken with each.
Feb 23, 2014 16:07:15 #
I agree that would be a great post, make sue you stand in the same spot, the same view and the same settings. I can hardly wait.
Feb 23, 2014 16:08:20 #
kw charlie wrote:
Thanks Captain and ss, both of your opinions I respect. I was just wandering if there was any real visual difference. As you know I just got my D4.
if it stops raining long enough..............
if it stops raining long enough..............
KW, NOW I see your concern. Between a bridge and a D4, there is NO difference. :lol:
Hey, just KIDDING!! :lol:
Very nice camera.
But, lucky for you, the D4 is "rainproof", so you can go out and shoot regardless!!
Enjoy your D4. ;-)
SS
Check out Street Photography section of our forum.
Feb 23, 2014 16:14:03 #
tramsey.......just a question, how did you make sue...............lol
Feb 23, 2014 16:18:42 #
Feb 23, 2014 16:23:50 #
GoofyNewfie wrote:
The bridge camera would have more depth of field.
Yes Goofy, but don't Nikons have the ability to crop in-camera?
Just set the crop to "bridge", and presto, the same DoF, or lack-there-of. :lol:
SS
Feb 23, 2014 16:23:56 #
GoofyNewfie wrote:
The bridge camera would have more depth of field.
It might not last as long, though. :D
Check out Close Up Photography section of our forum.
Feb 23, 2014 16:25:38 #
jerryc41 wrote:
It might not last as long, though. :D
I didn't even know DoF had a shelf life!! :lol:
SS
Feb 23, 2014 16:36:19 #
SharpShooter wrote:
I didn't even know DoF had a shelf life!! :lol:
SS
SS
It depends what you mean by DoF.
Feb 23, 2014 22:30:25 #
kw charlie wrote:
tramsey.......just a question, how did you make sue...............lol
that's a typo should be 'sure'
Feb 23, 2014 22:32:58 #
I have a bridge. I have had two of them. If you are OK with your shots being just a tiny, tiny bit out of focus then a bridge is fine. But your D4 because of it's larger sensor can give you much sharper photos.
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Check out Professional and Advanced Portraiture section of our forum.