Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main Photography Discussion
Go Professional on Limited Budget??
Page <<first <prev 7 of 11 next> last>>
Feb 12, 2014 13:23:56   #
Festus Loc: North Dakota
 
Kuzano wrote:
Just read a post where a member on the forum commented that he/she wanted to buy a camera to work toward becoming professional. Camera budget ... $900.

That person literally got hammered by 2 to 1 posts about "better rethink the budget"... some proffering $9000 as a starting point.

REALLY??????

How does this type of reaction to a simple post encourage photography at any level.

I know there are some on this board who want to stifle professional dreams as a function of protecting a domain they think they alone own. I discount those people off the bat.

Does everybody really think that a person with skills and the courage to market their work (KEY word) cannot begin to sell their work and go on to created a thriving photography business.

To people like the poster in this case, I say good luck and Go For It, even if there is only $900 bucks in the bank at the moment.

The poster did not say they weren't able to spend more when it becomes necessary.

There certainly are many cameras/lens kits out there that can create work that WILL sell, and priced at $1000 or less. This is true particularly if you include used and refurbished camera's.

I'm not the friendliest guy on this forum, and not particularly well liked by some whose shit I have gotten into it with.

Like the scorpion said to the pig in the middle of the river, "It's my nature".

But come on folks. Where's the camaraderie, the good intent, and the willingness to give a fellow hogger a hand up.

Yes, you can start a photography business with any number of camera's I can think of.

The camera is NOT the deterrent. The lack of willingness to do the work is the problem. Many of the responses on this forum would deter others and kill such willingness to make the attempt. Sad!! Sad!! Sad!! :cry:

I would go ahead and make up a list of $900 camera's that will produce images that can be sold, but frankly the list is way to long.

The spirit and creativity of the individual who does the appropriate things to become a professional is the heart of success.

Most of those who poo poo'd the $900 camera budget clearly have no aspirations of becoming professional, particularly if they think the camera and the money spent on it is the key to opening that door.

Big surprise for those people....A professional uses the camera that is available when the subject or scene presents itself. I am confident that many who are professional today started out with an UNDER $1000 camera equipped with one lens. :shock:

To me, being a Professional Photographer, means creating part or all of your income with a camera and photography, no matter how much equipment you own or what you spent for it!
Just read a post where a member on the forum comm... (show quote)


We are now on page 5 or 6 in posts for the original Message. Just went back and read it again. Right in the first sentence it states, "work towards becoming a professional photographer". One could interpret this as $900 applied towards developing the skills and funds now and over several years, to be utilized in the future as a professional photographer.

Reply
Feb 12, 2014 13:24:42   #
Old Redeye Loc: San Mateo, CA
 
OonlyBonly wrote:
Good idea.


:thumbup:

Reply
Feb 12, 2014 13:24:51   #
OonlyBonly
 
knowles_ra wrote:
I'm not going to comment on whether a photography business can be successful with a $900 camera kit, as I'm not a professional, I'm an inexperienced noob to serious photography, and this is only my second post to this forum. I will admit, though, that if this thread is an indicator of how enthusiastic amateurs are treated, it may be my last. Some of you should be ashamed of yourselves.


:thumbup:

Reply
 
 
Feb 12, 2014 13:33:25   #
emmons267 Loc: Arizona, Valley of the Sun
 
[quote=Annie_Girl"...Being a professional photographer is not an easy or quick way to make money and there is actully alot more to it than owning your first DSLR.

Don't mean to be picky but there is no such word as "alot". So I wouldn't use that in any of your ads. It should be "a lot".

Reply
Feb 12, 2014 14:01:41   #
Marionsho Loc: Kansas
 
Tango44 wrote:
I am new to this forum and would like to thank you for your comments! I have been reading many comments from members that make me question my participation. I am new to photography and have a simple camera and love to take pictures. I want to learn. However, some of the comments I have read sound as though there is a snobbery among some members. We all start at a level we can afford. I will never be a professional photographer (nor do I want to be). I really enjoy seeing the photos of other members and the fantastic work they are able to do. It is inspiring and helpful!

I will, also mention, that there are a lot of kind, generous folks on this site. I am learning to recognize names and, as with anything, you pick what you want to read. Thanks!
I am new to this forum and would like to thank you... (show quote)


:thumbup:

Reply
Feb 12, 2014 15:02:20   #
DebAnn Loc: Toronto
 
Amongst all the crap that always appears on these kind of threads, it's a pleasure to read a post like yours SharpShooter. You talk sense and your view of the subject is always well thought out and written. Kudos to you.

And to you naysayers who tend to sound like photography snobs when you suggest some people shouldn't think about going pro, I say "rubbish". You don't have to be a full-time paid photographer to be considered a pro. Once people start requesting your services because they have seen your excellent work, you have proved yourself to be worthy of the designation. And you can be a pro with nothing more than a Canon Rebel (or equivalent other brand) a speedlight and a couple of diffusers. You're wrong if you suggest otherwise and you really should get over yourselves.
SharpShooter wrote:
I agree with you 100%.
You are never gonna catch me discouraging someone that wants to be a pro or shoot a low budget wedding. I too have chastised people for not offering help. It cost nothing to do so.
Most here think you need to start in at least the middle, if not the top. A pro takes many forms. The more experienced the pro, the more they could do with less. I'm not saying its ideal, you just have to know what your doing.

As for a beginner, like any of us, they will learn, as have all of us have learned.
I'm in a pro program at a College with a very good foto program. I'm the old guy in class. Most of the kids shoot with Rebels and kit lenses from Costco. Most had not done any DSLR work before taking Intro to Digital. That's where they learned to use their cameras. They need to take a few prerequisites before they can enroll in the pro program.
Some of the work produced by these kids will blow away most Photogs.
Every semester there is a girl or two that are 19-25 that are shooting weddings with their Rebel cameras and an off camera flash. They have their albums and prints made by Bay Photo(or similar), and their work is as good as any I've ever seen. Sure, they are not shooting $50k weddings, but completely by word of mouth, they shoot every weekend, because they are good, not because they have pro gear, which they will eventually have. That's how some start, and are not afraid of it.
Sure it's better to have insurance, a website, pro gear, an agent, and a commercial building made of cement full of Profoto lights and every snoot known to man.
But all that's really mandatory is a lot of talent, a Rebel camera, a decent
off-camera flash and a 5-in-1,(or two). You can rent the 85 1.2 for indoors.
You want to hang your shingle, I'll help you put it up. ;-)
SS
I agree with you 100%. br You are never gonna cat... (show quote)

Reply
Feb 12, 2014 15:04:24   #
speters Loc: Grangeville/Idaho
 
Kuzano wrote:
Just read a post where a member on the forum commented that he/she wanted to buy a camera to work toward becoming professional. Camera budget ... $900.

That person literally got hammered by 2 to 1 posts about "better rethink the budget"... some proffering $9000 as a starting point.

REALLY??????

How does this type of reaction to a simple post encourage photography at any level.

I know there are some on this board who want to stifle professional dreams as a function of protecting a domain they think they alone own. I discount those people off the bat.

Does everybody really think that a person with skills and the courage to market their work (KEY word) cannot begin to sell their work and go on to created a thriving photography business.

To people like the poster in this case, I say good luck and Go For It, even if there is only $900 bucks in the bank at the moment.

The poster did not say they weren't able to spend more when it becomes necessary.

There certainly are many cameras/lens kits out there that can create work that WILL sell, and priced at $1000 or less. This is true particularly if you include used and refurbished camera's.

I'm not the friendliest guy on this forum, and not particularly well liked by some whose shit I have gotten into it with.

Like the scorpion said to the pig in the middle of the river, "It's my nature".

But come on folks. Where's the camaraderie, the good intent, and the willingness to give a fellow hogger a hand up.

Yes, you can start a photography business with any number of camera's I can think of.

The camera is NOT the deterrent. The lack of willingness to do the work is the problem. Many of the responses on this forum would deter others and kill such willingness to make the attempt. Sad!! Sad!! Sad!! :cry:

I would go ahead and make up a list of $900 camera's that will produce images that can be sold, but frankly the list is way to long.

The spirit and creativity of the individual who does the appropriate things to become a professional is the heart of success.

Most of those who poo poo'd the $900 camera budget clearly have no aspirations of becoming professional, particularly if they think the camera and the money spent on it is the key to opening that door.

Big surprise for those people....A professional uses the camera that is available when the subject or scene presents itself. I am confident that many who are professional today started out with an UNDER $1000 camera equipped with one lens. :shock:

To me, being a Professional Photographer, means creating part or all of your income with a camera and photography, no matter how much equipment you own or what you spent for it!
Just read a post where a member on the forum comm... (show quote)
The only post I recognize with this in mind, was one were the budget limit was set to $400 and said person was going to shoot weddings. Well, I don't know if a $9000 starting point is necessary, but it sounds reasonable. $400 dollars is not even get you a single flash that'll do everything you want it to do, behold a whole camera set-up (lenses and & and etc.).

Reply
 
 
Feb 12, 2014 15:07:58   #
RKL349 Loc: Connecticut
 
Well said!

Reply
Feb 12, 2014 15:15:46   #
terry44 Loc: Tuolumne County California, Maui Hawaii
 
The key word is work toward's, there are many great cameras out there for that price range. Also if it is the art they are interested in check out film they can be picked up for a nominal cost and some fantastic work can be done with them in the right hands. All it takes is drive and the willingness to get there, they can invest more cash as they get it. I wish them all the luck in the world.
Kuzano wrote:
Just read a post where a member on the forum commented that he/she wanted to buy a camera to work toward becoming professional. Camera budget ... $900.

That person literally got hammered by 2 to 1 posts about "better rethink the budget"... some proffering $9000 as a starting point.

REALLY??????

How does this type of reaction to a simple post encourage photography at any level.

I know there are some on this board who want to stifle professional dreams as a function of protecting a domain they think they alone own. I discount those people off the bat.

Does everybody really think that a person with skills and the courage to market their work (KEY word) cannot begin to sell their work and go on to created a thriving photography business.

To people like the poster in this case, I say good luck and Go For It, even if there is only $900 bucks in the bank at the moment.

The poster did not say they weren't able to spend more when it becomes necessary.

There certainly are many cameras/lens kits out there that can create work that WILL sell, and priced at $1000 or less. This is true particularly if you include used and refurbished camera's.

I'm not the friendliest guy on this forum, and not particularly well liked by some whose shit I have gotten into it with.

Like the scorpion said to the pig in the middle of the river, "It's my nature".

But come on folks. Where's the camaraderie, the good intent, and the willingness to give a fellow hogger a hand up.

Yes, you can start a photography business with any number of camera's I can think of.

The camera is NOT the deterrent. The lack of willingness to do the work is the problem. Many of the responses on this forum would deter others and kill such willingness to make the attempt. Sad!! Sad!! Sad!! :cry:

I would go ahead and make up a list of $900 camera's that will produce images that can be sold, but frankly the list is way to long.

The spirit and creativity of the individual who does the appropriate things to become a professional is the heart of success.

Most of those who poo poo'd the $900 camera budget clearly have no aspirations of becoming professional, particularly if they think the camera and the money spent on it is the key to opening that door.

Big surprise for those people....A professional uses the camera that is available when the subject or scene presents itself. I am confident that many who are professional today started out with an UNDER $1000 camera equipped with one lens. :shock:

To me, being a Professional Photographer, means creating part or all of your income with a camera and photography, no matter how much equipment you own or what you spent for it!
Just read a post where a member on the forum comm... (show quote)

Reply
Feb 12, 2014 15:24:50   #
indycaver Loc: Indianapolis
 
Ares23 wrote:
Throughout this whole thread all I've seen is a pissing contest and not one single answer to the original post; if any were made. Did anyone give advice to this person or did it just turn into what a said previously "a Pissing Contest" between people who claim they are "PROS" and others simply defending the fact that owning a EOS 1D X does not a Pro make!


Some people just can't seem to see beyond their own negative perspectives!

Reply
Feb 12, 2014 15:52:06   #
knowles_ra Loc: Gloucester, VA
 
Any professionals out there use a non-FF camera? I know FF seems to be the 'weapon of choice' for many pros.

Reply
 
 
Feb 12, 2014 15:54:36   #
creativ simon Loc: Coulsdon, South London
 
:thumbup: :thumbup:

Reply
Feb 12, 2014 15:54:37   #
Pepper Loc: Planet Earth Country USA
 
I think it would be helpful if we knew what aspect of photography the OP was talking about and just how "professional photographer" is being defined. I think if one is doing street photography less money need be available as oppose to portrait photography. I'd also like some clarity as to what the $900 is actually suppose to cover. I was under the impression that the $900 was total start up but now understand the $900 is only for a body and a lens, big difference in the two. Maybe the OP should add some details giving us all fewer assumptions to make. I also continue to wonder what "semi-professional" photos are. Did the OP really mean "optimal" or did the op mean "optical"? I really think any kind of valuable, usable input will be difficult based on all the required assumptions.

Reply
Feb 12, 2014 16:03:41   #
mdorn Loc: Portland, OR
 
It really comes down to statistics, doesn't it? It's an established fact that most new businesses fail within the first 5 years. Why do these businesses fail? Mostly due to incompetence in the form of a lack of experience, planning, and record keeping. Add to this emotional pricing and a few other variables, and it equals failure.

Assuming that 80 to 85% of all new photography businesses fail, this means 15-20% of them are successful or have given up without failing. Regardless, there are some that can become successful with little or no money down (sounds like a get rich quick scheme now).

Some of us are optimists and others are pessimists---or as my dad calls himself "a realist". Your views and opinions really reflect how you view the statistics. Anyone with a $900 camera can become successful running their own photo business---valid point. Most will fail to become successful with a $900 camera---another valid point.

My opinion on this matter (not that anyone really cares at this point based on the mudslinging) is that we should focus on the question without making a bunch of assumptions about the OP. Of course, I am guilty of this too. We all are. It's hard to answer a question with a total stranger's real intentions at heart. Just answer the question. There is no wrong answer, and it is the OP's job to weed through the responses and find the one or many that apply to him or her. Yes, we are all very self-important, but my opinion should carry more weight because I've been through it---I KNOW. But that is the key... you KNOW based on your own circumstances and experience---not based on the OP. Just answer the question, and move on. Don't try to convince someone that they don't know what they are talking about because chances are you really don't know what they are talking about. Just my opinion based on 50+ years of living with people. :-)

Reply
Feb 12, 2014 16:07:54   #
wasatch Loc: Salt Lake City, UT
 
Annie is only trying to point out some of the risks. Even after you have the camera and lenses, you need a computer with photo software, a professional web site, business cards, etc. Also, it is true that 80 - 85 percent of all professional photographers fail within the first few years. Of course that is true for almost any start up business, photography or not.

I have been taking pictures for years and have had people want to pay me to take pictures for them. I politely refuse. I don't want to turn my hobby into a profession, especially where the average earnings are less than $30,000 a year.

The other question is whether or not I'm a decent photographer. ;-)

Reply
Page <<first <prev 7 of 11 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.