Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main Photography Discussion
CPL'S, Nikon or B+W?
Page <prev 2 of 3 next>
Jan 29, 2014 19:34:16   #
amehta Loc: Boston
 
DaveO wrote:
So your gut says okay, the 67 is okay as opposed to springing for a 77mm?

I would say get the 77mm. That will also work with almost any mid to high end Nikon lens you may get in the future, since quite a few have a 77mm filter ring.

Reply
Jan 29, 2014 19:40:30   #
DaveO Loc: Northeast CT
 
Sounds reasonable, I was hoping to cheat because I've got decent 52,58 and 67mm CPL's. I didn't want to short sell the wide angle and butt heads with the wife on the 67 that she uses. She's easy and pretty much sticks with the 18-105, so that will work out well because I like the 85 and 12-24! Thanx much, Dave.

Reply
Jan 30, 2014 00:08:44   #
Cameoblue Loc: British Columbia Canada
 
DaveO wrote:
Preference of Nikon - 77mm Circular Polarizer II Filter or B+W - 77mm Kaesemann XS-Pro Circular Polarizer MRC Nano Filter. Price diff is $10, so that's not a factor Don't want to spend more. Will use on Tokina 12-24 and Nikkor 85mm (B+W step-up ring) If relatively equal, it sounds like the B+W will clean easier. Thoughts?


I have the exact B+W filter you mention and use it successfully on my FF with a 24-105 and 70-200. If I needed to buy another CPL I would get another one without a second thought. I can not speak for the Nikon as I know nothing about them. The B+W has a brass filter thread so it is less prone to cross treading or getting stuck to the lens but a 2 dollar filter wrench is always handy to have in the camera bag. B+W are known for quality so resale value is also maintained.

Reply
 
 
Jan 30, 2014 06:35:43   #
rmalarz Loc: Tempe, Arizona
 
DaveO wrote:
Preference of Nikon - 77mm Circular Polarizer II Filter or B+W - 77mm Kaesemann XS-Pro Circular Polarizer MRC Nano Filter. Price diff is $10, so that's not a factor Don't want to spend more. Will use on Tokina 12-24 and Nikkor 85mm (B+W step-up ring) If relatively equal, it sounds like the B+W will clean easier. Thoughts?


I've moved to using B+W filters. As for step up rings, I've also moved to using those when it comes time to use a CPL. Now, I only have to carry one CPL, a large dia. one, and adapt it to the other lenses. Slightly less weight to carry.
--Bob

Reply
Jan 30, 2014 07:00:49   #
DaveO Loc: Northeast CT
 
Bret wrote:
I use B+W...Iv'e never considered a Nikon filter.


From what I"ve seen, you're obviously doing something right!

Reply
Jan 30, 2014 07:01:46   #
DaveO Loc: Northeast CT
 
rmalarz wrote:
I've moved to using B+W filters. As for step up rings, I've also moved to using those when it comes time to use a CPL. Now, I only have to carry one CPL, a large dia. one, and adapt it to the other lenses. Slightly less weight to carry.
--Bob


Sounds good!

Reply
Jan 30, 2014 07:08:48   #
DaveO Loc: Northeast CT
 
Cameoblue wrote:
I have the exact B+W filter you mention and use it successfully on my FF with a 24-105 and 70-200. If I needed to buy another CPL I would get another one without a second thought. I can not speak for the Nikon as I know nothing about them. The B+W has a brass filter thread so it is less prone to cross treading or getting stuck to the lens but a 2 dollar filter wrench is always handy to have in the camera bag. B+W are known for quality so resale value is also maintained.


This is the road I was looking to take, but there's a lot of folks out here that have a lot of experience that I wanted to tap. To ask about Nikon versus B+W was almost as bad as Ford versus Chevy! Thank-you much!

Reply
 
 
Jan 30, 2014 07:12:28   #
DaveO Loc: Northeast CT
 
amehta wrote:
I would say get the 77mm. That will also work with almost any mid to high end Nikon lens you may get in the future, since quite a few have a 77mm filter ring.


Thanx again! Got to stop collecting things one of these days! Like the old westerner said: I've got more guns and ammunition than I need, but not nearly enough!"

Reply
Jan 30, 2014 08:14:12   #
sueyeisert Loc: New Jersey
 
I buy B+w because the fittings are brass. With very wide lenses there's a problem with polarizers. Call B&H or seek advice. I go to lectures at B&H and just heard Tim Cooper a great landscape photographer. He said don't buy a linear polarizer. BTW he also buys B+W.
DaveO wrote:
Preference of Nikon - 77mm Circular Polarizer II Filter or B+W - 77mm Kaesemann XS-Pro Circular Polarizer MRC Nano Filter. Price diff is $10, so that's not a factor Don't want to spend more. Will use on Tokina 12-24 and Nikkor 85mm (B+W step-up ring) If relatively equal, it sounds like the B+W will clean easier. Thoughts?

Reply
Jan 30, 2014 09:50:27   #
DaveO Loc: Northeast CT
 
sueyeisert wrote:
I buy B+w because the fittings are brass. With very wide lenses there's a problem with polarizers. Call B&H or seek advice. I go to lectures at B&H and just heard Tim Cooper a great landscape photographer. He said don't buy a linear polarizer. BTW he also buys B+W.


Thank-you much, you folks have made my decision easier!!

Reply
Jan 30, 2014 09:53:52   #
Bloke Loc: Waynesboro, Pennsylvania
 
selmslie wrote:
It just occurred to me that you mentioned using a polarizer on a very wide-angle lens.

This is not going to work as well as it would on a normal or telephoto because a polarizer has its strongest effect at 90 degrees from the light source.


I will second that! The lens is wide enough that part of the sky will be darkened, and part of it will not. I took some pictures of my church like that, and they are unusable.

Reply
 
 
Jan 30, 2014 09:57:13   #
DaveO Loc: Northeast CT
 
Bloke wrote:
I will second that! The lens is wide enough that part of the sky will be darkened, and part of it will not. I took some pictures of my church like that, and they are unusable.


Yes, I've seen that, particularly on the high end. Certainly something to be aware of. Thank-you for responding.

Reply
Jan 30, 2014 13:39:33   #
amehta Loc: Boston
 
DaveO wrote:
Thanx again! Got to stop collecting things one of these days! Like the old westerner said: I've got more guns and ammunition than I need, but not nearly enough!"

We've all got GAS (gear acquisition syndrome). There is no cure, only treatments.

Reply
Jan 30, 2014 17:00:47   #
DaveO Loc: Northeast CT
 
:thumbup: :thumbup:

Reply
Feb 1, 2014 15:13:18   #
wj cody Loc: springfield illinois
 
DaveO wrote:
I agree to a certain extent. For a very nominal fee, Sensei has produced some very inexpensive " filter wrenches" that work, see B&H. Gottem and they work well. I would opt however, for a decent quality ring, and it appears B+W is a viable option and there are probably others. My deal is that I already own a decent 67mm CPL and would rather buy a good step up ring as opposed to another CPL, but wide angle usage is a tough issue to start with. Got to be careful or "unequal" distribution occurs.
I agree to a certain extent. For a very nominal fe... (show quote)


with regard to adapter rings, those made of brass and plastic are excellent and do not bind. any aluminium ring will bind, as that is a characteristic of the beast.

Reply
Page <prev 2 of 3 next>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.