That is your interpretation and instead of addressing the subject you address the 'mood'.
If my post 'sounds' or reads ad 'angry' it is because of the slant you place onto it.
This is just one sample of your misinterpretation:
I wrote:
I also mentioned that as people we are conditioned to look down.
You see this as
"looking down on people" when in the context it is about looking, watching, observing something. We do not look horizontally or up because our visual universe is lower than our normal view point.
As examples:
If we are in a valley, we rarely look up the slopes but toward either end of the valley.
On a beach we look at the horizon (down) or on the coast, also down.
We go to 'view points' on a road to look down onto a particular landscape.
All our visual live that what we do: look down before looking up.
Coming from this single misinterpretation, how can I trust your ability to understand what I would call the 'mood' of my post?
When I expose a difference, dynamic vs static and said that there is no need to follow through with a conversation is futile if one does not get the meaning of both words? Is not that correct? If you like pretty 'please' of the like, please do what I request, go away. I state things however I see them. 'Please' will not raise the understanding of a person.
Further:
I wrote:
Everything I mentioned is simple, self evident and should not be said since I/we can assume that everyone knows it.
Is also incomplete. What I post is REALLY boring for those who are aware of what I type but I do not fall into the trap that if I know something everyone else does. Hence the part you omit...
"Trouble is I do not assume anything." It is called sharing knowledge.
Continuing, point by point on your post...
I wrote:
To the folks who denigrated my posts, concepts and tentative explanations, do me a favor, ignore me and my posts.
If you like idiots, that is your privilege. I do not. I say so and I ask them to stay away. Once again, as above I state clearly how I feel. I make no excuse for it. You may not like it, no skin off my back.
Still..
I wrote:
The posting of accompanying optical usual illusions drawings is far from original and demonstrates how uninspired the poster is.
Originality demonstrates an ability to think, to offer something one can relate to within a context and in a site like this one 'CREATED' by the person. To copy and paste something is boring, uninspiring and well, common.
I am ending with the last one that I skipped:
I wrote:
I have been exposed lately mainly to shortsightedness and boring folks unable to see further than their own small mind, such as it is.
You sign off with:
you wrote:
It's just the way my small mind has perceived it.
That is your own view and while trying to be 'self-depreciating' in effect you say that your mind is better, well, it is because you do not have the honestly of saying: "
I am better than you" which is what you imply. And YES I imply that at the moment my mind works better than yours. I make no apologies for it.
You do not like my use of the board features. Guess what? They are here for a reason. To use them you have to learn them first. Did you take the time? If so, why are you not using them? On that, I did not select
red, I selected
brown, I first thought of using
Navy but in some insane part of my mind associating the name of the US Navy with something like that would be inappropriate. So brown it became.
As to your PS, 'authoritative', 'decent bio' and the like, that is what I call 'internet child talk'. You have nothing that can decently contradict any of my observations so you go into 'what is your education' 'what diplomas do you have' and so forth. If you like to know I was a high school drop out because I was bored. I since went to college, did not graduate onto anything because I do not see the point of a piece of paper. I took education courses on what interested me at the time from creative writing to computer programing. I did pass numerous professional certifications as those are 'needed' to find employment when you move all the time. I am still a student in college, I am 57. I learn and forget until I need it. And, oh yeah, I do not like little boxes called 'educated minds' and those who take paper as a reference to education, experience and ability to understand.
If I tell you that we do move we vibrate you will not be able to understand at all what it really means. Why? Because your point of view does not use the same references I have. (Good luck with that one).
To those who are now upset and feel like I am an asshole, do not worry I am well aware of your opinions and I share it. So no need to tell me!