Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main Photography Discussion
My D300 and 500mm Nikkor gone, 45ft into the ocean
Page <<first <prev 7 of 10 next> last>>
Mar 12, 2013 13:41:01   #
Len Van Hirtum Loc: Nashua, NH
 
I am so sorry to hear about you mishap and loss.

Len Van Hirtum
ps: Great photos

Reply
Mar 12, 2013 13:42:41   #
SharpShooter Loc: NorCal
 
Marty, you are a very lucky man. You are here to tell us your tale. And in any photo gathering, you will always be listened to, when telling you saga.
I say lucky, because the authorities could be up there right now saying, who would have left such a beautiful rig as this just sitting here and just walked away?
Lucky that your places had not been reversed.
The equipment can be easily replaced with better stuff and you will shoot another day.

Reply
Mar 12, 2013 13:58:48   #
barbaradear Loc: ny, usa
 
I put in an earlier response, but I can hardly wait to hear what you will be looking at as a replacement..... I dropped my Nikon D50 with an 18-200 Nikon lens a few days ago. I'm having the lens repaired and now looking to an upgrade camera. SO GLAD YOU ARE OKAY!!!! Keep us up to date....

Reply
 
 
Mar 12, 2013 14:29:15   #
texaseve Loc: TX, NC and NH
 
I learned a lot from this story and am relieved I have my gear insured through USAA. This was done after I fell UP a hill with my Nikon and nice lens in hand....I did not let go of the camera and paid dearly with my weak back. I have not been able to work as a floor RN since that accident. Your life is so much more important. Sorry for your loss. Those pics are beautiful.

Reply
Mar 12, 2013 14:31:08   #
barbaradear Loc: ny, usa
 
texaseve wrote:
I learned a lot from this story and am relieved I have my gear insured through USAA. This was done after I fell UP a hill with my Nikon and nice lens in hand....I did not let go of the camera and paid dearly with my weak back. I have not been able to work as a floor RN since that accident. Your life is so much more important. Sorry for your loss. Those pics are beautiful.



This is called perspective. I'm sincerely sorry for you....

Reply
Mar 12, 2013 15:06:12   #
Brucej67 Loc: Cary, NC
 
This might help:
Actually, the D800e still has a filter in place over the sensor, but the composition of the layers of the filter is altered to reverses the effect of a standard OLPF, yielding increased resolution. Physically, there is essentially no difference in the sensor/filter assembly other than the layers of the filter that cause it to function differently (as if it weren't there).

See: http://imaging.nikon.com/lineup/dslr/d800/features01.htm#a12 scroll down about half-way to the section with the heading "-Functions of low pas filter."

The D7100 is different - it actually does not include any filter. See:
http://imaging.nikon.com/lineup/dslr/d7100/features02.htm#a6

Hope this helps you understand.

CSI Dave wrote:
Martys wrote:


I'm looking at the D7100,..to be released within a week,.......or the D800,....am undecided.

Marty


I'm curious why the lack of an AA filter in the D7100 doesn't seem to worry you about moire, but the D800E does?

And my tongue-in-cheek comment is that I'm surprised no one has chimed in yet to say "...if only you would have invested in a better tripod...". Seriously, though, I'm sorry to hear about your equipment, that is a real bummer.
quote=Martys br br I'm looking at the D7100,..t... (show quote)

Reply
Mar 12, 2013 15:14:09   #
topduck1
 
how did you get the images if you lost the camera

Reply
 
 
Mar 12, 2013 15:27:48   #
Martys Loc: Lubec, Maine
 
topduck1 wrote:
how did you get the images if you lost the camera


I'd been there shooting for several hours prior to the accident and had changed media cards just prior to it going over.
I lost only the images the D300 took with it on that compact flash card.
Small consolation

Reply
Mar 12, 2013 15:37:37   #
DePratt Loc: Stantonsburg, NC
 
Martys wrote:
Last Thursday while photographing at Quoddy Head State Park,...

Had been there for almost two hours photographing 10-14 foot seas crashing into Gulliver's Hole a scenic point there. It was windy off and on but not as bad as I'm accustomed to seeing,....sooooooo I thought.

I had worked my way out onto an isolated precarious location with a fantastic viewpoint,...I've worked it many times previously,....the narrow ledge wasn't even 3 foot wide and about 45 feet above the rocks out into the ocean. Had been shooting elsewhere as well for several hours and just about to relocate once again. I had just removed my 32GB compact flash card that was now full with my mornings work.

Then,...............I had a rude awakening I'll not soon forget,.... when I turned for a second to grab something out of my camera bag,....I heard the tripod crash to the ground,...as I turned and I saw the 500mm lens with my D300 attached,... snap off the tripod mount and drop virtically down out of sight.
The sound of camera and lens make as it smashed its way down against the rocks is a sound I hope to never ever hear again.

I was in total disbelief,...in just a split second,...everything gone.

Had the 500mm base casting not sheared off,...the tripod would have gone too.
At that point though I was totally and completely demoralized and sick to my stomach. All I could do was sit there and talk to myself over and over,...(lots of adjectives)

So,....ladies and gentleman and fellow hedgehogs,......PLEASE learn from my sudden poor judgement and costly $$$$ mistake.

Watch carefully your equipment,...no matter how secure you think it is sitting there exposed to the forces of nature and gravity.

I never, never thought in all my years of being a photographer that I would be thr recipient of something like this. I have always erred on the side of being toooooo careful and always observant of potential dangers,.......

But not on March 7th, 2013,....I paid dearly in a split second,...thinking all was secure with my equipment.
Too late to get the moment back,....the horse was already out of the barn.

Anyway,....I wanted to share that with each who reads this,...be careful,...IN ADVANCE,....of something unexpected happening.

Yes I had it insured,...or I should say under insured,....had recently decreased the insured value,...why,...because something this catastrophic wouldn't happen to me,....yeah right.

Will be having some D300 accessories for sale soon as I look for a new replacement camera.

Thanks for reading this and I hope it awakens in you,...that false sense of security I thought I had.


Ive posted an image of where it happened,...as a visual so you can see the crime scene and the drop off,
The outcrop from the tree on the right side of the image attached,...thats where I was standing.

The second image was taken from that ledge just prior to the deep six plunge.
Was the image worth the cost,......not unless I get paid big $$$ bucks for the image,...totally unlikely.

It helps to laugh,..........now,...not then.

Be well ,....and that includes your camera gear.

Marty
Last Thursday while photographing at Quoddy Head S... (show quote)


Was the camera demoralized because it could not take better photos and committed suicide? :mrgreen:

Reply
Mar 12, 2013 15:48:46   #
Dave B Loc: Ramsey,Cambridgeshire UK
 
Hi Racmanaz, it is indeed a Fuji X100 which I have in addition to my nikon gear. The menu has a mind of it's own and getting your preferred settings is a lottery, BUT, the pictures are brilliant thanks to the excellent lens so I forgive it the oddities in operation. I'm not the only one to have these sort of problems, recently in the U.K. there was a magazine article saying much the same!

Dave

Reply
Mar 12, 2013 15:53:19   #
Martys Loc: Lubec, Maine
 
[quote=Brucej67]This might help:
Actually, the D800e still has a filter in place over the sensor, but the composition of the layers of the filter is altered to reverses the effect of a standard OLPF, yielding increased resolution. Physically, there is essentially no difference in the sensor/filter assembly other than the layers of the filter that cause it to function differently (as if it weren't there).
**************************************
Thanks,....I'll read and reread that as I make my decision.
So much information to assume you understand before committing to one or the other.
Lots of valuable opinions here as well as more reading to absorb it.
Thank you for the links.
Marty

Reply
 
 
Mar 12, 2013 15:55:58   #
Martys Loc: Lubec, Maine
 
Was the camera demoralized because it could not take better photos and committed suicide? :mrgreen:[/quote]
**********************************************
Will never know,....it now sleeps with the fish.

Reply
Mar 12, 2013 15:57:09   #
Lucian Loc: From Wales, living in Ohio
 
Marty at least you did not loose the images you shot all day. Better to have them than have everything gone.

Reply
Mar 12, 2013 16:00:54   #
CSI Dave Loc: Arizona
 
Brucej67 wrote:
This might help:
Actually, the D800e still has a filter in place over the sensor, but the composition of the layers of the filter is altered to reverses the effect of a standard OLPF, yielding increased resolution. Physically, there is essentially no difference in the sensor/filter assembly other than the layers of the filter that cause it to function differently (as if it weren't there).

See: http://imaging.nikon.com/lineup/dslr/d800/features01.htm#a12 scroll down about half-way to the section with the heading "-Functions of low pas filter."

The D7100 is different - it actually does not include any filter. See:
http://imaging.nikon.com/lineup/dslr/d7100/features02.htm#a6

Hope this helps you understand.

CSI Dave wrote:
Martys wrote:


I'm looking at the D7100,..to be released within a week,.......or the D800,....am undecided.

Marty


I'm curious why the lack of an AA filter in the D7100 doesn't seem to worry you about moire, but the D800E does?

And my tongue-in-cheek comment is that I'm surprised no one has chimed in yet to say "...if only you would have invested in a better tripod...". Seriously, though, I'm sorry to hear about your equipment, that is a real bummer.
quote=Martys br br I'm looking at the D7100,..t... (show quote)
This might help: br Actually, the D800e still has ... (show quote)


Yes, I understand all that. The two cameras essentially arrive at the same end result but have different ways of getting there. My intended point (and question to Marty) was since that neither camera has any "functional" low pass filter, both should be - in some instances - susceptible to moire effects. However, he was only worried about it on the D800E, not the D7100. It made me wonder if he noticed the D7100 does not have an AA filter.

Reply
Mar 12, 2013 16:09:32   #
Brucej67 Loc: Cary, NC
 
I understand what you meant and was only being technically correct, as I was also corrected on this myself and that is how I found out. Does it matter, no, but it is an interesting point to ponder. My bet was that Nikon was testing the market with the D800e and found there was enough interest in the feature to introduce it in the DX market. I have the D800 and wanted the D800e for this feature so now I can spend $2,000 less and get it.


CSI Dave wrote:
Brucej67 wrote:
This might help:
Actually, the D800e still has a filter in place over the sensor, but the composition of the layers of the filter is altered to reverses the effect of a standard OLPF, yielding increased resolution. Physically, there is essentially no difference in the sensor/filter assembly other than the layers of the filter that cause it to function differently (as if it weren't there).

See: http://imaging.nikon.com/lineup/dslr/d800/features01.htm#a12 scroll down about half-way to the section with the heading "-Functions of low pas filter."

The D7100 is different - it actually does not include any filter. See:
http://imaging.nikon.com/lineup/dslr/d7100/features02.htm#a6

Hope this helps you understand.

CSI Dave wrote:
Martys wrote:


I'm looking at the D7100,..to be released within a week,.......or the D800,....am undecided.

Marty


I'm curious why the lack of an AA filter in the D7100 doesn't seem to worry you about moire, but the D800E does?

And my tongue-in-cheek comment is that I'm surprised no one has chimed in yet to say "...if only you would have invested in a better tripod...". Seriously, though, I'm sorry to hear about your equipment, that is a real bummer.
quote=Martys br br I'm looking at the D7100,..t... (show quote)
This might help: br Actually, the D800e still has ... (show quote)


Yes, I understand all that. The two cameras essentially arrive at the same end result but have different ways of getting there. My intended point (and question to Marty) was since that neither camera has any "functional" low pass filter, both should be - in some instances - susceptible to moire effects. However, he was only worried about it on the D800E, not the D7100. It made me wonder if he noticed the D7100 does not have an AA filter.
quote=Brucej67 This might help: br Actually, the ... (show quote)

Reply
Page <<first <prev 7 of 10 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.