Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main Photography Discussion
Photographing people: natural or posed?
Page <<first <prev 3 of 5 next> last>>
Feb 7, 2024 04:08:01   #
User ID
 
scallihan wrote:
In the few weddings and birthdays my husband and I shot upon request, we found that posed brought better results. Candids resulted in people with mouths open while eating, messy tables, blinking eyes, loopy smiles, etc. Posed subjects can still appear to be having fun if you can get their attention and have them make a toast or something.

That returns us back to the Title of the thread, wherein is planted a question based on a false dichotomy: "Natural *OR* Posed".


(Download)


(Download)


(Download)

Reply
Feb 7, 2024 06:03:25   #
Bultaco Loc: Aiken, SC
 
Longshadow wrote:
"Easier", candid.
"Posing" can be frustrating for both the photographer and model, especially if neither is very experienced.

Better results? Depends on one's preference.



Reply
Feb 7, 2024 07:41:03   #
ronichas Loc: Long Island
 
I have always loved photographing people. I travel quite a bit and I sometimes find myself posting people on the street, if they agree to be photographed.







Reply
 
 
Feb 7, 2024 08:06:21   #
agillot
 
Natural .

Reply
Feb 7, 2024 08:53:07   #
DavidPine Loc: Fredericksburg, TX
 
JZA B1 wrote:
Which style is easier? Can it be made to look authentic if your subjects are posing? Is it more about the skill of the photographer or the "model"? (With most people not being professional models.)

Can a good photographer with non-models produce natural-looking but posted photographs?

Or should you try to shoot candid pictures if you want natural look and forget trying to pose people?


I consider then different genres.

Reply
Feb 7, 2024 08:59:29   #
pdsdville Loc: Midlothian, Tx
 
I much prefer candid shots. Most people who are not professional models seem to tense up and you can tell it. My best people shots are casual candid shots. They just seem to have more impact.

Reply
Feb 7, 2024 09:10:22   #
frankraney Loc: Clovis, Ca.
 
azted wrote:
Are you shooting for yourself, or have you been hired for a specific purpose?
Posed shots always look better than candids, because you have the attention of your subject.
Candids look best when there is movement and you captured it in process. Otherwise you have just a lot of people's backs.



Why would candid shots only show backside. At least 90% of my shoes are candid, and not one is backside, unless it's a batter in the box, facing the pitcher and me.

Reply
 
 
Feb 7, 2024 09:11:17   #
gvarner Loc: Central Oregon Coast
 
Its styles are easy. Both styles are difficult. Take your pick. I take snaps at events for my own record. Most are candies, some are posed. If thereโ€™s food, be sure to get someone with their mouth full. ๐Ÿ˜‰

Reply
Feb 7, 2024 09:12:58   #
frankraney Loc: Clovis, Ca.
 
azted wrote:
People when they are talking in a group often "circle" each other. So when the photographer wants to get a candid, there are always more backs than you would want. Your statement assumes the candid subject is alone, and mine assumes there is a group of people.



Duplicate

Reply
Feb 7, 2024 09:13:34   #
frankraney Loc: Clovis, Ca.
 
DirtFarmer wrote:
I take group shots posed. That way they're all facing the camera. I usually take several shots (maybe up to 20). If flash is needed I raise the ISO so the flash is loafing and take a 3-burst. That mitigates blinkers. Having a lot of shots to choose from in a posed group makes it easy to swap heads to get one photo with everyone looking their best.

If it's a group milling around the room I sometimes use my 200-500 to isolate one person for a candid. (70-200 for smaller rooms). Unless the room is very crowded you can usually get a reasonable background for an individual.

Personally, I prefer the candids because they look like the person is relaxed. Of course there are shots that don't work because they suddenly looked into the camera. And I can't say that all the candids I get are great shots.
I take group shots posed. That way they're all fac... (show quote)



Reply
Feb 7, 2024 09:54:35   #
sippyjug104 Loc: Missouri
 
I believe police mug shots are staged. ๐Ÿ˜

Reply
 
 
Feb 7, 2024 10:34:19   #
photoman43
 
Based on my experience, it depends on the attitude of the person being photographed and the knowledge and skill of the photographer. My grand daughter loved to be posed for photos when she was about 4-12. As she got older, she was less interested in posed photos. My adult children, all in their 50s, will not pose for a photo for more than 5 seconds and the pictures taken reflect their rigidness and discomfort. Candids are what work best for them.

The main skill a photographer needs IMO is to keep the setting (and light) as simple as possible, like window light.

Reply
Feb 7, 2024 10:48:13   #
raymondh Loc: Walker, MI
 
One thing about portrait photography - you can tell itโ€™s portrait photography. Difficult to create the unique natural expressions that candids capture.

Reply
Feb 7, 2024 11:16:57   #
frankraney Loc: Clovis, Ca.
 
sippyjug104 wrote:
I believe police mug shots are staged. ๐Ÿ˜


Lol.... Experience.,?

Reply
Feb 7, 2024 11:35:10   #
davidrb Loc: Half way there on the 45th Parallel
 
JZA B1 wrote:
Which style is easier? Can it be made to look authentic if your subjects are posing? Is it more about the skill of the photographer or the "model"? (With most people not being professional models.)

Can a good photographer with non-models produce natural-looking but posted photographs?

Or should you try to shoot candid pictures if you want natural look and forget trying to pose people?


You are dealing with people. The answer to your question is YES and NO.

Reply
Page <<first <prev 3 of 5 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.