Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main Photography Discussion
Use of 2 polarizers
Page <<first <prev 3 of 3
Dec 11, 2023 12:49:25   #
jackpinoh Loc: Kettering, OH 45419
 
User ID wrote:
Cross POLarizing does NOT cause vignetting. Thaz just ridiculous. As to color cast, thaz a very minor thing thaz easily handled in PP. Just another typical UHH unfounded worry ... unless acoarst youre still shooting E6 !

Hawgsters obsess over over even the tinyest potential technical imperfection, which is only reasonable cuz most of their photographs are generally amazing creative works that should never be blemished by even the slightest of imperfections. Just surf the Photo Gallery to appreciate the creative tsunami that is UHH.
Cross POLarizing does NOT cause vignetting. Thaz j... (show quote)


Where did I say cross polarization causes vignetting?

Stacking any type of filters can interfere with light entering at the edges of the lens. That is why filter venders offer low profile neutral density filters. I've never seen a low profile polarizing filter.

Reply
Dec 11, 2023 13:06:21   #
larryepage Loc: North Texas area
 
Stan Fayer wrote:
Instead of using several ND filters is it posable to use 2 polarizing filters to restrict the light?


Despite the snide remarks, yes, this can and has been done. Years ago, i bought a gadget at a surplus store that was designed to mount on the eye pieces of a pair of binoculars. (I never could get them to work on mine.) Each side had a whole arrangement holding two pieces of polarizing materials that could be rotated with respect to each other. The two sides were linked together and the density of filteation could be adjusted.

Visual quality was OK for binoculars. Not sure what happened to them.

Reply
Dec 11, 2023 13:33:58   #
jimpitt
 
My question is simple.
Why reduce light?
Lenses more expensive increase light.

Reply
 
 
Dec 11, 2023 13:41:24   #
User ID
 
jackpinoh wrote:
Where did I say cross polarization causes vignetting?

I've never seen a low profile polarizing filter.

Never seen a thin PL ?!? Heres one, pictured below ... but its from a manufacturor almost no ones ever heard of, so you might hafta go to a super special exotic vendor, like B&H, to get one. B&H is on an obscure little island on the US East Coast between New England and Pennsyltuckee ... but they do have a website.

Hoya thin PL from B&H listing
Hoya thin PL from B&H listing...
(Download)

Reply
Dec 11, 2023 13:45:09   #
CHG_CANON Loc: the Windy City
 
Most of the damage done from the eclipse was caused by people who had set up their camera and lens on a tripod pointing at the sun while waiting for the eclipse. This prolonged exposure causes a lot of heat to build up and will eventually start burning through apertures, shutters, sensors and anything else in its way.

Two examples of damage from the last total eclipse in the US:

A 'burn' onto a camera sensor -



Melted aperture blades -


Reply
Dec 11, 2023 13:46:59   #
User ID
 
jimpitt wrote:
My question is simple.
Why reduce light?
Lenses more expensive increase light.

I think I can decipher ESL and so I think I would hugely agree on that idea in *most* situations. OTOH, the sun is a really super bright subject during most daytime hours.

Acoarst a usable exposure for the sun will completely under expose everything else within the frame, so the image aesthetics photographing the sun would be severely limited for anyone foolish enough to try it, except perhaps very close to the horizon.

Examples of the sun near to the horizon abound all over the internet. A few such collected images are attached below:







Reply
Page <<first <prev 3 of 3
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.