Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main Photography Discussion
Use of 2 polarizers
Page 1 of 3 next> last>>
Dec 8, 2023 08:47:12   #
Stan Fayer
 
Instead of using several ND filters is it posable to use 2 polarizing filters to restrict the light?

Reply
Dec 8, 2023 09:14:12   #
BebuLamar
 
If you use 2 polarizers you could create a variable ND filter by adjusting the angle of the 2 polarizers. However, I think it has a color cast.

Reply
Dec 8, 2023 09:19:13   #
Longshadow Loc: Audubon, PA, United States
 
BebuLamar wrote:
If you use 2 polarizers you could create a variable ND filter by adjusting the angle of the 2 polarizers. However, I think it has a color cast.

Then there's the problem of rotating one without rotating the other.

Reply
 
 
Dec 8, 2023 09:29:39   #
Stan Fayer
 
What about if you are shooting in monochrome.

Reply
Dec 8, 2023 12:03:44   #
cambriaman Loc: Central CA Coast
 
Yes. Also, therefore a number of sources are available for Variance Neutral Density filters which employ that principal.

Reply
Dec 8, 2023 13:40:52   #
MJPerini
 
Either way can work , but with polarizers and wide lenses you could get some unwanted sky effects.

Reply
Dec 8, 2023 14:00:02   #
CHG_CANON Loc: the Windy City
 
I've never found a CPL that was cheaper than an ND filter. Why not just get the ND filter(s) you need?

Reply
 
 
Dec 8, 2023 14:50:01   #
Hip Coyote
 
Stan Fayer wrote:
Instead of using several ND filters is it posable to use 2 polarizing filters to restrict the light?

Why not three or perhaps add a red filter with a dehaze filter?

Bruce Lee was quoted as saying the key to brilliance is simplicity. True in martial arts and true in most things. Need to cut down on reflections? Use a polarizer. Need to reduce light to get a longer shutter speed, use an ND filter. Don’t fumble around with this unless it is some sort of experiment for experiment's sake.
Otherwise. Simplify and go make some photos.

Reply
Dec 8, 2023 16:08:37   #
BebuLamar
 
CHG_CANON wrote:
I've never found a CPL that was cheaper than an ND filter. Why not just get the ND filter(s) you need?


Use the linear ones work better.

Reply
Dec 8, 2023 16:26:26   #
Stan Fayer
 
It is sort of an experiment, as we were talking about shooting a solar eclipse and using ND filters. I was looking for comments. Thanks Folks

Reply
Dec 8, 2023 16:36:50   #
CHG_CANON Loc: the Windy City
 
Stan Fayer wrote:
It is sort of an experiment, as we were talking about shooting a solar eclipse and using ND filters. I was looking for comments. Thanks Folks


If not already, you need to research the strength filter to shoot an eclipse so you don't melt the insides of your camera. Stacked CPLs are unlikely to meet the minimum requirement.

Reply
 
 
Dec 8, 2023 16:38:57   #
Longshadow Loc: Audubon, PA, United States
 
CHG_CANON wrote:
If not already, you need to research the strength filter to shoot an eclipse so you don't melt the insides of your camera. Stacked CPLs are unlikely to meet the minimum requirement.


Reply
Dec 8, 2023 17:00:27   #
Stan Fayer
 
Using linear filters (2) I have been able to block out light completely .

Reply
Dec 8, 2023 17:03:24   #
larryepage Loc: North Texas area
 
CHG_CANON wrote:
If not already, you need to research the strength filter to shoot an eclipse so you don't melt the insides of your camera. Stacked CPLs are unlikely to meet the minimum requirement.


Even for less rigorous requirements, when I have experimented with crossed polarizers, I have found them to often be "splotchy."

Reply
Dec 8, 2023 18:22:19   #
CHG_CANON Loc: the Windy City
 
Stan Fayer wrote:
Using linear filters (2) I have been able to block out light completely .


Check your insurance before heading out to the eclipse ...

Reply
Page 1 of 3 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.