Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main Photography Discussion
Static Photography
Page <<first <prev 4 of 5 next>
Dec 1, 2023 11:15:14   #
lamiaceae Loc: San Luis Obispo County, CA
 
BebuLamar wrote:
I don't think engineers are precise as they deal with real physical things and they know there is always some degrees of unknown. My brother is a mathematician and he can't deal with tollerances.


I think of engineering as an applied science. Math is at the core and part of the vocabulary of both. (My degree is in Biology).

Reply
Dec 1, 2023 12:07:50   #
larryepage Loc: North Texas area
 
lamiaceae wrote:
I think of engineering as an applied science. Math is at the core and part of the vocabulary of both. (My degree is in Biology).


There is a very interesting and healthy tension between math and engineering. A mathematician is quite ecstatic to successfully prove that a solution to a problem exists. The engineer doesn't really care about all that. He just wants to know what the answer is.

Reply
Dec 1, 2023 14:11:50   #
TonyBot
 
CHG_CANON wrote:
The real beauty of photography is found in all the unwritten rules.


That, and the breaking if the established rules!

Reply
 
 
Dec 1, 2023 17:17:06   #
skatz
 
Static photography would be pictures of lightning, right?

Reply
Dec 1, 2023 17:50:47   #
SuperflyTNT Loc: Manassas VA
 
The very few times I’ve seen the term “static photography” it was a misguided attempt to differentiate between still photography and video. Ironically in video there is such thing as a static shot. It just means the camera is in a fixed spot, no camera movement or zoom. There can be plenty of movement in the shot, but the camera view never changes.

As for breakfast? A frittata made with leftover shrimp which is then grilled between two flour tortillas with some cheese to make a glorious breakfast quesadilla which is topped with guacamole and some Old Bay hot sauce.

Reply
Dec 1, 2023 18:02:00   #
Bill_de Loc: US
 
Indiana wrote:
So, I have never heard the term used as it relates to photography, but it is probably out there, and I just haven't seen it; it's called, static photography. As I see it, it would incorporate Landscape, Architecture, and other immovable objects that are stationary just waiting to be photographed. Nothing moves...they are static. In real estate it is called fixity of location. So, this title (static photography) just groups know entities into a category that covers several well established labels. I'm not quite sure how the term would be used other than as a conversation starter, but even then it has some value and utility. Just my thought of the day.
So, I have never heard the term used as it relates... (show quote)


If you didn't think " static photography" related to "photography" why did you post this here without doing any research?

---

Reply
Dec 1, 2023 18:17:08   #
CHG_CANON Loc: the Windy City
 
When I was last at CostCo, they were selling sleeves of 6-bagels 2 for 1. A well toasted Cinnamon-Raisin, cream cheese, and Raspberry Amaretto Jam made today's breakfasts menu. And coffee, black.

Reply
 
 
Dec 1, 2023 19:46:45   #
MrPhotog
 
Indiana wrote:
So, I have never heard the term used as it relates to photography, but it is probably out there, and I just haven't seen it; it's called, static photography. As I see it, it would incorporate Landscape, Architecture, and other immovable objects that are stationary just waiting to be photographed. Nothing moves...they are static. In real estate it is called fixity of location. So, this title (static photography) just groups know entities into a category that covers several well established labels. I'm not quite sure how the term would be used other than as a conversation starter, but even then it has some value and utility. Just my thought of the day.
So, I have never heard the term used as it relates... (show quote)


How would this differ from ‘still life’ photography?

I can see the obvious location and size differences between table-top still life scenes and architecture, but there is also a lot of overlap, as models of buildings (prototypes) are often photographed long before the actual building is constructed.

Are landscapes static, or do they just seem so? Clouds move and skies change patterns and colors through the day. Even a gentle breeze moves the leaves.

When I saw the title I thought this might be about Kirlian photography, which captures images of discharges of static electricity. These were popular for a while maybe 50 years ago.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kirlian_photography

Looking for Kirlian photography today on Google shows a lot of sites referencing photographing a person’s ‘aura’. It seems to have found a home with ‘NewAge’ practices.

Reply
Dec 2, 2023 14:05:53   #
CamB Loc: Juneau, Alaska
 
Indiana wrote:
So, I have never heard the term used as it relates to photography, but it is probably out there, and I just haven't seen it; it's called, static photography. As I see it, it would incorporate Landscape, Architecture, and other immovable objects that are stationary just waiting to be photographed. Nothing moves...they are static. In real estate it is called fixity of location. So, this title (static photography) just groups know entities into a category that covers several well established labels. I'm not quite sure how the term would be used other than as a conversation starter, but even then it has some value and utility. Just my thought of the day.
So, I have never heard the term used as it relates... (show quote)


Sixty years of carrying a camera and I have never heard the term "static photography." I can probably photograph another twenty years without knowing what it is.

Reply
Dec 3, 2023 00:23:05   #
MDI Mainer
 
dustie wrote:
I really got zapped on this one!!

When I saw the title, my thought was it may be a tutorial on how to scuff your feet across the carpet then photographically catch the little static sparks when you touch the door knob.....
.....or how to rub certain fabrics together to cause a static charge, then photographically catch the little static flashes when pulling them apart.....
......or how to photographically catch that little static flash when your favorite house pet lightly touches its nose against your statically-charged hand.....
I really got zapped on this one!! br br When I sa... (show quote)


Might not 5,000-15,000 volts destroy the sensor? And are full-frame sensors more resistant to static charges than APS-C of MFT sensors? And do raw files capture more of the charge than JPEGs?

chrome-extension://efaidnbmnnnibpcajpcglclefindmkaj/https://intranet.birmingham.ac.uk/hr/documents/public/hsu/information/electrical/staticelectricity.pdf

Reply
Dec 3, 2023 10:49:43   #
Wyantry Loc: SW Colorado
 
CHG_CANON wrote:
For breakfast I finished off some leftover potatoes from Thanksgiving.


T M I !

Reply
 
 
Dec 3, 2023 10:51:54   #
Wyantry Loc: SW Colorado
 
dennis2146 wrote:
I really am more drawn to Chg. Canon's reply but to give some credit to your post I feel the need to be fair and answer.

No I have never heard the term, static photography. I have heard and it is completely appropriate and enough, to say landscape photography, architectural photography and so on. Do we really need some cockamamie other name just to suit a small contingent of people?

Dennis


Ah! The endless conflict between the “Lumpers” and the “Splitters”.

Reply
Dec 3, 2023 10:53:59   #
Wyantry Loc: SW Colorado
 
CHG_CANON wrote:
I don't see how any single Landscape photographer would ever be willing to be lumped together under a single heading that includes Architecture.

Moreover, if I shoot a Farris wheel, is that 'static' even if it's moving, such as at night with the lights blurred in a long exposure. Or, is that a long-exposure? Or, just not 'static', even if that wheel never rolls, just rotates in place?

Really ... this just seems like another jobs program for new deputies in the Internet Police Force. We have enough of those already ...
I don't see how any single Landscape photographer ... (show quote)




Reply
Dec 3, 2023 11:17:52   #
larryepage Loc: North Texas area
 
Indiana wrote:
So, I have never heard the term used as it relates to photography, but it is probably out there, and I just haven't seen it; it's called, static photography. As I see it, it would incorporate Landscape, Architecture, and other immovable objects that are stationary just waiting to be photographed. Nothing moves...they are static. In real estate it is called fixity of location. So, this title (static photography) just groups know entities into a category that covers several well established labels. I'm not quite sure how the term would be used other than as a conversation starter, but even then it has some value and utility. Just my thought of the day.
So, I have never heard the term used as it relates... (show quote)


This discussion has been fun to watch. There really is at least one accepted use of the term "static." It applies to things that normally move, but are in a stationary environment for some reason. Examples are aircraft on static (non-flying) display at an airshow, automobiles on display at the local Sonic drive-in on Saturday afternoon, and new passenger train equipment on display for public inspection at the local depot.

These situations present interesting photographic challenges. Most are related to how to photographically represent the normally dynamic subjects in an interesting manner.

So yes...I can see a quite legitimate use for the term. It might even be extended to cover photography of children. Sitting still for a portrait is certainly not a noal depiction for a child.

Reply
Dec 3, 2023 11:23:42   #
Wyantry Loc: SW Colorado
 
CHG_CANON wrote:
I don't see how any single Landscape photographer would ever be willing to be lumped together under a single heading that includes Architecture.

Moreover, if I shoot a Farris wheel, is that 'static' even if it's moving, such as at night with the lights blurred in a long exposure. Or, is that a long-exposure? Or, just not 'static', even if that wheel never rolls, just rotates in place?

Really ... this just seems like another jobs program for new deputies in the Internet Police Force. We have enough of those already ...
I don't see how any single Landscape photographer ... (show quote)


Too many Internet Police Force (IPF’rs) [or maybe I P Fkrs] already.

Along with all the PC’s (Photo Cops).

The grammar police (GP’s).

The _______ police . . . .

Reply
Page <<first <prev 4 of 5 next>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.