Oooohhhh.......
....the polar considerations to be kept in mind so that one does not become positively negative in the conducting of sensory exposures.
I'm certain you are aware there are different types of sensors just as there are different types of attorneys. Some are quite good at one or two things but not really the best choice for other scenes when framed in light of the big picture.
Probably you've observed, what we see in the sectional discussions and array of photo sites --
(-- Main Photography Discussion
-- Photo Analysis
-- .........etc, etc
-- General Chit-Chat
-- .........etc, etc
-- The Attic
-- ..........etc, etc
-- Show Me What You Mean
-- ...........etc, etc, etc, etc)
Throughout the 54, or so, active and inactive sections arrayed, there are sometimes hot
P-eople
I-n
X-enon
E-levated
L-uminescence situations.
Turns out, the compositions sometimes are not smoothly blended circles of confusion aimed at sharpening focus on a matter of import, but are
S-taked
O-ut
O-bstinate
C-ontentions that produce
T-angled
I-n
F-ruitless
F-racas files of frats.
You know, contending over the proprietary uniquenesses involved in the ongoing
R-ight
A-nd
W-rong fan club tournaments will probably
J-ust
P-romote
E-xpanding
G-igabytes of crunchy, overly processed
F-orceful
F-oolishness that selectively focus and
M-ight
F-urther
T-hrow the rubbing-the-wrong-way frictions into
A-dvancing
P-rogrammed
S-editious
C-ontent.
Seems like sometimes, even those who have a background properly grounded in the fundamentals and have long-established connections firmly connected to the craft, are caught in cases of highly charged polar opposites where things are conducted in such a frictious, resistant manner that focal distortions get amped up, and yes........
.......sometimes in the discharges, highlights are all blown out and details are damaged or destroyed.....
Maybe none are exempt from the spark of the passion......if conditions are just right.