Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main Photography Discussion
Canon is now researching which retro Canon to bring back in a digital camera. Which ones were your fav retro Canon?
Page <<first <prev 5 of 7 next> last>>
Oct 28, 2023 13:07:02   #
gwilliams6
 
BebuLamar wrote:
I just watch the video and out of the 4 cameras the guy said Canon should make it looks like the Canon P. But without limited to the 4 models as I said it should be the A-1. Either the original F1 or New F1 is great camera but I don't think it would lend itself well to the digital version. The AE-1 while the best selling Canon 35mm SLR it's not a good candidate in my opinion.
The reason I pick the A-1 because it does look retro (vs something like the T-90 would not look retro even though it's not that much newer than the A-1) and it has the interface for 4 exposure modes so Canon can keep the interface similar.
I just watch the video and out of the 4 cameras th... (show quote)



Reply
Oct 28, 2023 13:07:05   #
MJPerini
 
While I have never been a particular fan of retro for retro's sake, or fake penta- prisms for that matter, I do love old cameras .... and still have 5 Nikon F's Black & Chrome Penta prism versions , Photomic versions and an F3.
Always admired the Canon F 1.
I always wondered why when they went digital , Both Canon and Nikon had spectacular Rangefinder models that looked (to me) like perfect templates for Mirrorless cameras.
Nikon & Fujifilm have had success with Retro, Canon has always said something like "We don't do Retro we look to the future....." Well I guess Retro as a marketing tool is getting too big for them to ignore.....
I do think they could have success with a Canon 7 in RF mount, it would give them a smaller form factor, based on a great camera. If they go the F1/ AE1 route they'd be doing exactly what Nikon is doing, better to be original (in my opinion) Or they could make a Leica Q3 out of the Canonette G III...........
Either of those would be somewhat 'Apple Like' ...... not first, but when people see it, they love it........

Reply
Oct 28, 2023 13:08:30   #
gwilliams6
 
flathead27ford wrote:
That was going to be my choice as well. 👍🏻👍🏻



Reply
 
 
Oct 28, 2023 13:09:54   #
gwilliams6
 
MJPerini wrote:
While I have never been a particular fan of retro for retro's sake, or fake penta- prisms for that matter, I do love old cameras .... and still have 5 Nikon F's Black & Chrome Penta prism versions , Photomic versions and an F3.
Always admired the Canon F 1.
I always wondered why when they went digital , Both Canon and Nikon had spectacular Rangefinder models that looked (to me) like perfect templates for Mirrorless cameras.
Nikon & Fujifilm have had success with Retro, Canon has always said something like "We don't do Retro we look to the future....." Well I guess Retro as a marketing tool is getting too big for them to ignore.....
I do think they could have success with a Canon 7 in RF mount, it would give them a smaller form factor, based on a great camera. If they go the F1/ AE1 route they'd be doing exactly what Nikon is doing, better to be original (in my opinion) Or they could make a Leica Q3 out of the Canonette G III...........
While I have never been a particular fan of retro ... (show quote)



Reply
Oct 28, 2023 13:10:55   #
gwilliams6
 
rehess wrote:
You seem to have uncorked a Wishing Well.



Reply
Oct 28, 2023 13:11:58   #
rehess Loc: South Bend, Indiana, USA
 
Are the Nikon cameras direct images of some one camera????

I was under the impression they just have the ‘flavor’ of a camera of that time.

Reply
Oct 28, 2023 13:13:47   #
gwilliams6
 
MrPhotog wrote:
I think they can package the electronics into any shape they want, with what ever features they want.

As I see it, the retro design is just a matter of picking what the shell looks like. They may be opting for ergonomics and familiar location of the controls, or just a familiar shape that screams ‘Camera!’ at first glance.



Reply
 
 
Oct 28, 2023 13:21:44   #
delder Loc: Maryland
 
sailwiz wrote:
I would much rather see a camera come out that will match the capabilities of current smartphones. Seems to me that going retro or even giving us the current stuff is just money ill spent.


Given the price points of modern ML Cameras, I don't see why an integrated Smartphone/ Pro or Semi Pro Camera combination couldn't be brought to market.

Size stipulations would be pocket sized; good application for Pancake Lenses. Large sensor, True EVF. Back screen for viewing & telephone functions.

Product would allow you to shoot & share high resolution images instantly.

Reply
Oct 28, 2023 13:47:02   #
Alafoto Loc: Montgomery, AL
 
tradio wrote:
I liked the A-1.


Me also.

Reply
Oct 28, 2023 14:17:01   #
rehess Loc: South Bend, Indiana, USA
 
delder wrote:

Product would allow you to shoot & share high resolution images instantly.

but the average UHHer would want to edit and edit the image before anyone sees it.

Reply
Oct 28, 2023 14:38:37   #
BebuLamar
 
rehess wrote:
Are the Nikon cameras direct images of some one camera????

I was under the impression they just have the ‘flavor’ of a camera of that time.


Not directly images of any one camera but the prism on the Df (or viewfinder hump on the Zfc and Zf) have the resemblance of the Nikon FM/FE series (these cameras look very much the same) and not of others like F, F2, F3 or FG, FA, EM etc...

Reply
 
 
Oct 28, 2023 16:26:09   #
gwilliams6
 
delder wrote:
Given the price points of modern ML Cameras, I don't see why an integrated Smartphone/ Pro or Semi Pro Camera combination couldn't be brought to market.

Size stipulations would be pocket sized; good application for Pancake Lenses. Large sensor, True EVF. Back screen for viewing & telephone functions.

Product would allow you to shoot & share high resolution images instantly.



Reply
Oct 28, 2023 16:26:30   #
gwilliams6
 
BebuLamar wrote:
Not directly images of any one camera but the prism on the Df (or viewfinder hump on the Zfc and Zf) have the resemblance of the Nikon FM/FE series (these cameras look very much the same) and not of others like F, F2, F3 or FG, FA, EM etc...



Reply
Oct 28, 2023 16:46:06   #
elee950021 Loc: New York, NY
 
User ID wrote:
Canon 7S ... altho no need to hope and pray for Canon to go that way when I can already choose between the Sony a7-C (new) or the Olympus Pen-F (used). And acoarst, the Fuji X-Pro series is quite retro, but I don't happen to have any lenses for that...


I vote for the Canon 7S too! A digital version would bookend my current 7S. I also love my Fuji X-Pro 1 and its baby brother, the XE-1. Both of these cameras have several later versions.

Be well! Ed


(Download)

Reply
Oct 28, 2023 18:26:14   #
Scruples Loc: Brooklyn, New York
 
rehess wrote:
Why colors??????

I remember only Silver and Black from those days.


Colors can be essential. If you have two different colored cameras you can have each one designated for a specific function. Also, if everyone’s camera looks similar then you can tell if your blue camera was stolen. Just saying…..

Reply
Page <<first <prev 5 of 7 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.