Not a fan of the “new” UHH structure
Sep 21, 2023 08:17:44 #
mvetrano2 wrote:
I'm 76 and I feel exactly the same way. Change is not always for the better!
Can’t possibly see how this new format is an improvement. What on earth was wrong with going to the sections you subscribed to, seeing what was new or what interested you, and moving on.
How does having a long list of old topics interspersed with brand new posts, In NO order, make things easier?
Sep 21, 2023 08:21:42 #
Why does this make sense? It seems like someone just opened a file cabinet and emptied all of the contents into a pile. Now it seems we have to sort through the pile to find the files I am interested in. What a mess. Who thought this would be better?
Sep 21, 2023 08:35:28 #
Sep 21, 2023 08:35:58 #
jcryan
Loc: Las Terrenas, Dominican Republic
I agree. The new format doesn't work for me. It wasn't broke so you shouldn't have tried to fix it.
Sep 21, 2023 08:36:08 #
jcryan
Loc: Las Terrenas, Dominican Republic
I agree. The new format doesn't work for me. It wasn't broke so you shouldn't have tried to fix it.
Sep 21, 2023 08:49:43 #
This is topic #18 on the subject, though I don't have them in order.
Sep 21, 2023 08:51:01 #
Sep 21, 2023 08:55:39 #
StanMac
Loc: Tennessee
This change reminds me of working in the corporate environment. Senior corporate managers have to impress stockholders and investors that they are innovative and forward looking by making changes. So they direct that changes in structure and responsibilities be made in the organization, an organization which is already a well oiled machine in its operation due to everyone’s familiarity with everyone’s responsibilities and roles. They used to call it “Process Re-Engineering”. It rarely made tangible improvements in operations and profits. Change for the sake of change is rarely successful in making things better.
Stan
Stan
Sep 21, 2023 08:58:06 #
Sep 21, 2023 08:58:41 #
Pretty much like the "New Coke". When something is well liked and successful, change it and upset your market. I don't like it or agree with it, but I shall adapt or ...
~Lee
~Lee
Sep 21, 2023 08:59:26 #
Sep 21, 2023 09:00:41 #
StanMac wrote:
This change reminds me of working in the corporate... (show quote)
Well said, StanMac.
~Lee
Sep 21, 2023 09:01:28 #
Seems to be a prime example of the old saw, if it ain't broke, don't fix it. The new "format" seems not to have a format. Just list everything in some undefined "order." Sorry for the quotation marks but as far as I'm concerned, the random listing is unusable. I'll check in for the next few days (as I have for the last many years), just to see if we've returned to what has worked so well. If not, regrets, but so long. Life's too short to have to slog through everything submitted to find what used to be presented so conveniently.
Sep 21, 2023 09:20:22 #
mvetrano2 wrote:
I'm 76 and I feel exactly the same way. Change is not always for the better!
Me too... this is like getting rid of the directories on your C: drive.... no folders, just a list of 50,000 files... makes no sense at all.
Sep 21, 2023 09:36:29 #
I wonder if the administrators are reading our frustration with this new unformat format and taking note! If so, please correct your mistake!
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.