Bill_de wrote:
That was not the OP as far as I can see.
---
my mistake you are correct.
wdross
Loc: Castle Rock, Colorado
User ID wrote:
Anticipating the unexpected, 12-100.
I use the 12-100. For just some casual local schlepping I do use smaller lighter lenses but to be reeeeally prepared the 12-100/4.0 is the deal.
I totally agree. I have the 12-100 for me and the less costly and smaller 12-45 for my wife. Both are fantastic lenses and have excellent image quality.
zug55
Loc: Naivasha, Kenya, and Austin, Texas
jcolton wrote:
I have a Sony A73. I'm thinking of a smaller camera for travel in my old age! I'm looking a Fuji XT-5 or an OM1. Any input on this decision?
I travel with a Sony A7III as well, and I am no spring chicken either. So size and weight of my equipment are important to me as well.
The Fuji X-T5 weighs 557g, vs. the A7III at 650g. The difference is about 93g, or just under four ounces. There is a difference, but it is not huge.
The difference comes in with lenses. My main travel lens is the Sony 24-105mm that weights 663g. To me, a travel kit of 1,313g is acceptable, but it may be too much for you.
I would consider the new Sony 20-70mm that weighs only 488g; the reviews for this lens are excellent. To me, this is the perfect focal range for travel, and you would not really need to bring another lens. I am proposing this as a possible solution that will allow you to travel light with the camera that you already have.
Mike D. wrote:
Nice images, you will not be disappointed.
Yes very cool, an independent eye thaz NOT shooting to please the judges at a dipschidt monthly camera club !
jcolton wrote:
I have a Sony A73. I'm thinking of a smaller camera for travel in my old age! I'm looking a Fuji XT-5 or an OM1. Any input on this decision?
I bring a small camera with a zoom lens.
By the way, you're not as old as you think you are. Whatever your age, there are many of us who are older.
sb
Loc: Florida's East Coast
I have a great camera - it does macro and normal up to beautiful wide angles. It does great video and records pretty good audio with the video - AND - it fits into my zippered pocket so it's always ready. I can do basic image editing right in the camera. With it's computer and cellular access I can determine how to get where I need to go, make reservations and download tickets, and even use it to pay for my admission or my gelato - this is valuable since much of Europe is now cashless. Because I always have it in my pocket, I am always ready to take a photograph - or to show people my recent photos! It is pretty marvelous.
I had an awesome two weeks in Italy and am already planning a return next year (yes, I DID throw a coin into the Trevi Fountain!).
It is called an iPhone 14 Pro.
The Roman Forum from the Palatine Hill.
(
Download)
The Coliseum
(
Download)
Ancient Roman Aqueducts, at the Aqueduct Park, about 12 miles outside of Rome. Nice spot for a walk.
(
Download)
I think you know David.
(
Download)
Hades kidnapping Persephone to take her back to the underworld to be his Queen. "The Rape of Persephone" at the Borghese Gallery in Rome - must-see place that requires getting tickets ahead of your trip.
(
Download)
A winery in Tuscany.
(
Download)
Sunset in Florence
(
Download)
Fountain in front of the Pantheon.
(
Download)
User ID wrote:
Yes very cool, an independent eye thaz NOT shooting to please the judges at a dipschidt monthly camera club !
Heaven forbid, we should spend thousands of dollars to impress other people. Nah, that never happpens here.
If you’re not looking for long telephoto shots, I’d say my first choice would be a quality smartphone camera. If telephoto is needed, there are several fairly small bodied bridge cameras with a fixed wide-to-extreme telephoto zoom range, quality optics, and a high pixel count sensor.
jcolton wrote:
I have a Sony A73. I'm thinking of a smaller camera for travel in my old age! I'm looking a Fuji XT-5 or an OM1. Any input on this decision?
I am more than happy with my OM-1, and Olympus has some great lenses. I mainly use the 12-40mm f/2.8 for travel along with a telephoto, but would really think about the 12-100 if I had it to do over.
gvarner wrote:
If you’re not looking for long telephoto shots, I’d say my first choice would be a quality smartphone camera. If telephoto is needed, there are several fairly small bodied bridge cameras with a fixed wide-to-extreme telephoto zoom range, quality optics, and a high pixel count sensor.
I you would like practical example of what a bridge camera can do, check out anything posted by MosheR.
wdross wrote:
For me, it would be an OM-1 with either a 12-40 f2.8, 12-45 f4 (lightest and smallest lens), or 12-100 f4 lens.
I have the OM-1 and all three of the lens specified. Any of these combinations are awesome. Typically I use the 12-100 f4. A little larger but gives me the best of the best.
jcolton wrote:
I have a Sony A73. I'm thinking of a smaller camera for travel in my old age! I'm looking a Fuji XT-5 or an OM1. Any input on this decision?
I use my D3400 and Tamron 17-50 2.8 lens.Smaller and lighter DSLR.
Sony RX100vii is what the OP needs. Size of a pack of cigarettes. It will render fine photos.
The hard truth is the time when cell phones were inferior for documenting a trip is long past. Travel photography is actually something "sell" phones are designed for and they do quite a good job for travel photography. Especially the newer ones with the zoom lenses.
But for those who truly like photography, a dedicated high performance camera, offers the opportunity to F** up all your once in a lifetime travel photos. That’s something a cell phone doesn’t give you a chance to do. 😂😂
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.