Bobert's son gets girlfriend pregnant.
Racmanaz wrote:
Because the boy is a son of a Republican. Do you think Frank would have posted the same story Had this been a Democrats son?
I'm still waiting for you to mak an intelligent post.
Fortunately, I have a lot of patience.
Frank T wrote:
I'm still waiting for you to mak an intelligent post.
Fortunately, I have a lot of patience.
Lol you repeat the same thing when you’ve been owned. Lol. Obviously this was not an intelligent thread you created here because you’re wrong.
The Aardvark Is Ready wrote:
No, I do not support rape. It's that I do not consider a 17yo having sex with a 15yo to be rape. weren't you ever a teenager, Frank? That's what they do. At least that's what normal teenagers did when I was growing up. Now, if he was 30, then you can make a case.
I've done that- 60 years ago!
Of course SHE was on birth control; and I used condoms- just in case.
With this much edumacation running rampant she'll be a 4th gen whacko @ 50.
On the other hand:
Here in Los Angeles we'll get \White Wing Whacko DA's really into this.
They'll scrutinize school records, looking for these teenage pregnancies.
Then they'll do the same to see if the fathers are under18.
And come down- hard- against the kids and their parents- to generate money and convictions.
Certain social groups, including coalitions of ministers and priests- counsel these poor people.
And talk most of them into marriages. Al parties are in favor. Problem solved!
Then the Conservative Lawdogs come out from under, proclaiming "Obstruction of Justice!".
They haven't won yet- but they keep coming back.
I understand some jurisdictions allow teenagers to do sex adventure. In the larger scope, the age of consent varies across the planet.
Frank T wrote:
So here we are. Lauren Bobert's 17-year-old son, got his 15-year-old girlfriend pregnant.
The age of consent in Colorado is 17, making Mr. Bobert a rapist.
Where's the arrest? Or, does he get a pass because his mom is holding office?
The Aardvark Is Ready wrote:
No, I do not support rape. It's that I do not consider a 17yo having sex with a 15yo to be rape. weren't you ever a teenager, Frank? That's what they do. At least that's what normal teenagers did when I was growing up. Now, if he was 30, then you can make a case.
It's the law. So you don't care about the law. Good to know.
jcboy3 wrote:
It's the law. So you don't care about the law. Good to know.
You told us all you were so smart. Well then, if you're so smart, why don't you know by now that in this case it's NOT the law? And anyway, slavery was once the law. Would you make that same accusation against abolitionists? And now to really hoist you on your own petard. Abortion is illegal in some states. Don't you support those laws? So you don't care about the law. Good to know. I want to hear your pretzel response.
The Aardvark Is Ready wrote:
You told us all you were so smart. Well then, if you're so smart, why don't you know by now that in this case it's NOT the law? And anyway, slavery was once the law. Would you make that same accusation against abolitionists? And now to really hoist you on your own petard. Abortion is illegal in some states. Don't you support those laws? So you don't care about the law. Good to know. I want to hear your pretzel response.
You are clearly talking to yourself, and I really don't want to interrupt you, but I do want to tell you should not eat that pretzel after you pull it out of your butt.
jcboy3 wrote:
You are clearly talking to yourself, and I really don't want to interrupt you, but I do want to tell you should not eat that pretzel after you pull it out of your butt.
Why don't you try answering the questions I posted instead of your immature response?
The Aardvark Is Ready wrote:
Why don't you try answering the questions I posted instead of your immature response?
Be easy on him, he's in his 80's and frail.
Racmanaz wrote:
Be easy on him, he's in his 80's and frail.
Yes. Frail of MIND and body it seems
Racmanaz wrote:
Be easy on him, he's in his 80's and frail.
Wait.... You're making fun of someone's age????? I always figured you for about 80.
JamesCurran wrote:
Wait.... You're making fun of someone's age????? I always figured you for about 80.
When did I make fun of his age? I always figured you for about 14.
The Aardvark Is Ready wrote:
Why don't you try answering the questions I posted instead of your immature response?
Maybe it's the immature way you ask your "question". Show respect, get respect.
jcboy3 wrote:
Maybe it's the immature way you ask your "question". Show respect, get respect.
Ha ha ha ha ha ha ha haha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha
Oh god ( I said that dirty word, I must be a bible thumper) please I can't stop laughing. Coming from you, that's rich. A person who calls others liars, dumb, mush heads, taliban, and talks about butts. Just admit, your a clown who claims to be a genius but when caught in his own logical inconsistencies acts like a stubborn child and goes and cries in the corner.
Racmanaz wrote:
OK I will ask you, do you have evidence that her son did not have access to birth control or condoms, or that they were not using it?
Needless pedantry - it was sarcasm and it was funny.
RAC you never fail to disappoint.
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.