As I recall Canon with the SX50, very small sensor, bridge camera, did a great job jumping 1200mm lens shot to 2400mm crop zoom. Stokes, a pro bird photographer used this technique well. An early CIZ?
"
http://stokesbirdingblog.blogspot.com/2013/02/canon-sx-50-hs-for-bird-photography-i.htmla6k you commented: "Detroit area but not inside the air pollution bubble/dome." I recall in the 1965 era driving to Detroit from Lansing, there was a SiFi futeristic dome over the city from all the industrial pollution.
a6k
Loc: Detroit & Sanibel
dpullum wrote:
...
a6k you commented: "Detroit area but not inside the air pollution bubble/dome." I recall in the 1965 era driving to Detroit from Lansing, there was a SiFi futeristic dome over the city from all the industrial pollution.
I was an active GA pilot in the Detroit area for many years and not that long ago.It was very visible when approaching from any direction. I also always see and smell it when I drive back from Florida on I-75 and come over the bridge near the round NG tank that is always painted to look like the ball being used in the seasonal pro sports (baseball, basketball...). Driving past the Coleman Young incinerator at the corner of I-75 and I-94 always smelled like a giant cat litter box.
I am grateful I don't live inside that bubble. It does affect the light from the sky on most days as well as everyone's lungs.
lreisner wrote:
I would appreciate it if you would tell me what CIZ stands for. Just as a general note to those who post it is helpful to many who reads these threads if you explain the meaning of the acronyms. They are not always obvious.
What you are trying to show is interesting.
Sony Clear Image Zoom: The Most Amazing Shooting Mode You Never Heard Of
a6k
Loc: Detroit & Sanibel
imagemeister wrote:
.... And, what is YOUR take-away from all this ??
Here is why my little experiment is really not conclusive when comparing the two "600 mm" shots. This is a different part of the same two 600 mm (equivalent) shots. The filenames are visible at the top and they identify which is which. In this one the sharpness of the green bushes is noticeably better on the one shot with the RX10m4. That is the reverse of the conclusion I reached when comparing the light fixture. The easy explanation for this is that the autofocus chose a different distance between the two shots.
This is a screenshot of the two images viewed in FastRawViewer (they are not raw) at 150%. My original post provided the actual files so anyone can do his or her own comparison to se what I am seeing.
I also included the same display but with edge and detail indicators turned on. This display is very useful but many will not at first appreciate it. If you look at the green edges in the two images you can see that the best focus distance is different. It's better at a further distance on the right (a6500) and closer on the left (RX10m4).
Each pair is probably a valid comparison between CIZ and not-CIZ but more care would be needed to compare between two very different camera-lens combinations. The best camera is the one you have with you. But the best settings are worth understanding.
Here's an example of Sony's Clear Image Zoom.
Sony a6600
LA EA4 Adaptor
Tamron 200-400 f5.6 @ 400mm
CIZ x2
1/1000 @ f7.1 ISO 1600
Tripod Slik U212
a6k
Loc: Detroit & Sanibel
FalconChase wrote:
Here's an example of Sony's Clear Image Zoom.
Sony a6600
LA EA4 Adaptor
Tamron 200-400 f5.6 @ 400mm
CIZ x2
1/1000 @ f7.1 ISO 1600
Tripod Slik U212
Well done! I note that you used the LA EA4 adaptor. I have one that I use with my Minolta 500/8 and it works well compared to manual focus but not compared to a real AF lens. But getting a reflex lens to AF is like a singing dog.
FalconChase wrote:
Here's an example of Sony's Clear Image Zoom.
Sony a6600
LA EA4 Adaptor
Tamron 200-400 f5.6 @ 400mm
CIZ x2
1/1000 @ f7.1 ISO 1600
Tripod Slik U212
This is extremely good with that Tamron - it is very OLD and not known for it's sharpness by today's standards - I did have one in the film era - it was well regarded at THAT time ......
.
I am amazed at how many submit pictures that fail in the most basic aspect... A LEVEL PICTURE!
It doesn't matter if the point of the picture is something else. Make the effort to do it right.
imagemeister wrote:
This is extremely good with that Tamron - it is very OLD and not known for it's sharpness by today's standards - I did have one in the film era - it was well regarded at THAT time ......
.
Thanks. Since the photo was taken I have replaced the Tamron with a Sigma 100-400 f5.6-6.3. I miss the constant f5.6, but the Sigma is a much superior lens to the old Tamron.
a6k
Loc: Detroit & Sanibel
bbrowner wrote:
I am amazed at how many submit pictures that fail in the most basic aspect... A LEVEL PICTURE!
It doesn't matter if the point of the picture is something else. Make the effort to do it right.
Wow, you really have to be bored to write this one.
What I am bored with is all too common errors that can easily be corrected and people who don't want them be brought to their attention so they can be better at what they do.
It's a question of what kind of a student are you. It's a question of do you want to improve. It's a question of are you willing to listen. It's a question of what kind of grades are good enough.
Yes I'm bored. Bored with stubbornness.
bbrowner wrote:
What I am bored with is all too common errors that can easily be corrected and people who don't want them be brought to their attention so they can be better at what they do.
It's a question of what kind of a student are you. It's a question of do you want to improve. It's a question of are you willing to listen. It's a question of what kind of grades are good enough.
Yes I'm bored. Bored with stubbornness.
85% of what’s in the photo gallery on here are snapshots. Neither the subject is interesting enough or the presentation is something I would submit to a gallery.
a6k
Loc: Detroit & Sanibel
Bbrowner may have already noted this but SuperflyTNT is talking about the photo gallery section. Just to be clear, my shots in this thread were NOT in the photo gallery section.
I have met many people over many years who insist on missing the point while they think that I'm missing the point. This appears to be in that category. Lincoln is alleged to have said:
You can please some of the people some of the time, all of the people some of the time, some of the people all of the time, but you can never please all of the people all of the time.
a6k wrote:
Bbrowner may have already noted this but SuperflyTNT is talking about the photo gallery section. Just to be clear, my shots in this thread were NOT in the photo gallery section.
I have met many people over many years who insist on missing the point while they think that I'm missing the point. This appears to be in that category. Lincoln is alleged to have said:
You can please some of the people some of the time, all of the people some of the time, some of the people all of the time, but you can never please all of the people all of the time.
Bbrowner may have already noted this but SuperflyT... (
show quote)
True, but gallery or not I would at least straighten photos before I posted. Then again if I have the time to compose before shooting they won’t need straightening.
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.