larryepage wrote:
Note that the GN of 60 is based on a distance of 2 meters...
Thanks for that!
Up here in Canada, we are on their Metric System. When I clicked on the OP's link I got a website from the UK- also Metric. My "strobe brain" is still on the U.S. system as to the estimation of distance and instinctive aperture setting. My "darkroom brian" is more comfortable with Metric, but I don't have a wet darkroom anymore, but I am still good in the kitchen or with cleaners and laundry detergent.
I have always been a bit suspicious as to published guide numbers. I usually found, over the years, that they are exaggerated and when I purchase a new flash unit, I usually establish my own GN which tends to be lower. Manual expose also varies as to the size of the room, the reflectivity of surrounding walls, etc.
The big problem that I fined in the published specification is they will start the watt-seconds output, which is electrical power (capacitance and voltage) and not light. Experienced flash users can estimate what a unit will do based on w-s output but a newcomer to flash can find it difficult to make the correlation. The old and more useful specification was B.CP.S. or E.C.P.S who are Beam or Effective Candle Power Seconds, respectively. This number is usually followed by an angle of coverage such as 60 degrees, etc. There is a formula which is: the SQUARE ROOT of .036 X BCPS X ISO+ GN. So, a typical strobe of 2300 B.C.P.S at ISO 100 would yield a GN of about 120 or f/12 at 10 feet.
There are caveats. This calculation holds of the flash is used directly with originally supplied reflector. Once you get into a bounce, softboxes, umbrellas or any modifier all bets are off, however, the basic calculation is a start bounce. and for those in the know a way of determining a flash unit's practical usage and general performance when contemplating a purchase.
Of course, this is all a basis for manual exposure calculation based on the inverse square law.
In a studio or studio-like setup, once the basic calculation is applied, it is usually easy for the photographer to instinctively set variations of exposures without too much mathematics. Even in a manual mobile and handheld situation an experienced shooter can estimate distance and set the aperture accordingly. For unfamiliar situations or more complex multiple flas setups, a flash meter is more of a necessity.
There is nothing wrong with auto-flash or more sophisticated TTL exposure management systems if you have flas gear with hose features that are compatible with the camera system in use. I have used these systems successfully, however, I sometimes have to override the system to accommodate different conditions that may throw off the automatic system in use. Knowing all the theories can be helpful, however, if the OP needs a basic GN he can simply place the flas. at 10 feet for the subject and make a series of exposures and 1/2 stop increments at various power settings and the multiply the successful exposure for each by 10 and stable the basic GN. If he des that with softbox in place, that will be the guide number for that specific setup with that modifier. When the distance is changed, the GN is divided by the GN.
This may seem very rudimentary, however, nowadays with all the automation, command controls, and sophisticated TTL systems, many folks art totally unaware of the manual operation of flash equipment.
There is yet another improvisation, that is calibrating the modelling lamp to the flash tube output and using a standard non-flas meter to calculate exposure. Perhaps that is better saved for another lesson
I hope this helps the OP and am sorry he got hazed in the schoolyard.