L Smith wrote:
I use a Canon 70D and during a Birding outing I keep the camera turned on. After several hours the battery is often almost out of charge. My original Canon batteries didn’t lose their charge as fast. I have tried two generic batteries that were cheaper with poor results. Should I buy Canon batteries instead. They are quite a bit more expensive. Could the camera or the settings be draining the batteries?
I don't believe the 70D has GPS, but it does have WiFi. Unless you're using it, go into the menu and turn off WiFi... that may be causing the battery to drain faster.
Other things you can do:
1. Set the camera to go into sleep mode in as short a time as possible. Our cameras wake up so quickly at the touch of a button, it's not a problem if you need to take a fleeting shot. The camera should not drain the battery at all when it's in sleep mode. You should be able to leave it turned on, ready to use after a half second waking up.
2. Turn off automatic image review. Just call up images manually to check them every so often. (Doing this also reduces chance of missing shots when you're distracted by the replaying images and "chimping".)
3. Don't use the built-in flash. It draws heavily on the camera battery. Get an accessory flash and use that instead... it will work better in every possible way, and won't drain the camera battery.
4. Minimize the time you spend in the menus. One thing that can help, if 70D have it, is the green star user defined menu page. You can assign your most used features to that to have really quick access. The Q button/Quick Menu (if 70D has it, I think it does) also uses the rear LCD, so minimize using that too. Most of the settings that's used for are accessible via buttons and dials, anyway.
I can't tell you how good or bad 3rd party LP-E6 batteries are. All mine are OEM Canon batteries. Some are the original, around 10 years old, have been recharged many, many times and still work fine. Others are the newer LP-E6N with slightly higher capacity. I really can't tell the difference in the cameras. All together I have a dozen of them. I use grips on the three cameras that I take to most shoots, each of which holds two batteries. So I have one extra set for each camera (this is fewer spares than I used to carry with the old NIMH batteries). Honestly, I rarely need the backups. At events I often shoot for 8 or 10 hours and take 3000, 4000 and sometimes more shots without needing to change batteries (as long as I remember to charge them up the day before
). Two cameras do the majority of the work and I estimate I get upwards of 1250 shots per battery, just using some basic power-saving tricks (see below).
Now the latest Canon LP-E6NH are what you find in stores, with another modest boost in capacity. These are more expensive than the two previous versions. I haven't used any of them.
I also haven't used, but hear good things about the Watson brand batteries. They are a bit cheaper than the Canon, but I believe are compatible with the Canon chargers and give full info in the camera, just like the OEM batteries.
That's not the case with some of the 3rd party LP-E6 "clones". Especially the cheapest ones. They can't be charged in the Canon charger and come with their own. They also don't report full info in many of the cameras... just basic charge level status. This is because they don't have the same chips, tech and firmware that the Canon and Watson batteries do. I'd be concerned about using those in my cameras.
Yesterday I watched a video on Youtube about another common type of lithium battery, in which he compared nine different brands in a series of tests. What was obvious was the cheapest Made-in-China with the biggest capacity claims were among the worst and all actually had nowhere near the capacity they claimed. Problem is, most of the batteries today are made in China, I think even the OEM Canon. There are both good and bad coming out of China. So I'd stick with known, established brands that have good quality control... if not Canon, then someone like Watson. Check out reviews by users of other brands. And avoid the really cheap, unknown brands.
The optical viewfinder and AF system of DSLRs and the IS in lenses don't draw a lot of power. I mentioned above about how many shots I get and am shooting 6, 8 sometimes even 10 hours. I am using AF and IS heavily. I also see almost no difference in the number of shots I get when using an IS lens on one camera and a non-IS lens on the other. So that's not a big thing. (Back when I was shooting film, my EOS-3 cameras could drain a set of AA alkaline batteries amazingly fast, just keeping the AF system and IS active. If I wasn't careful, Sometimes I would only get two or three rolls of film to a set of batteries. I should have gotten about 30 or 35 rolls.)