Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main Photography Discussion
Nikon in serious financial trouble
Page <<first <prev 4 of 10 next> last>>
Jan 20, 2021 09:33:56   #
AZNikon Loc: Mesa, AZ
 
LEWHITE7747 wrote:
Going to lose $720 million dollars this year---Canon to make '$616 million dollars.


You must be quite thrilled! I am very happy for you!

Reply
Jan 20, 2021 09:35:39   #
olemikey Loc: 6 mile creek, Spacecoast Florida
 
HRPufnstuf wrote:
My $400 cell phone has a camera. My $400 Canon T3i has a much more versatile camera, does all I need, including some wedding and portrait photography. But when the top of the line cameras are $6500+, and some lenses $2000 - $4000, I can see where camera companies are shooting themselves in the foot.

I think if the best cameras were under $1000, and the best lenses $500 - $1000, they would sell a heck of a lot more.


OR, if the cameras were as heavily subsidized as phones!!!

This is a simple view from 20K feet:- Your phones would be but a toy without the heavy support base, the networks and providers. You can get a pretty capable smartyphone for "free" (of course it isn't free, because it is nearly useless without the support system, and costly plans) because in order to use it you spend a lot of money each year on the privilege of being part of the network.

All of that and the constant upgrades to new phones is a multi-trillion$$ business world-wide. And then they are one of the most "breakable" devices I've ever seen, look at one wrong and the screen cracks, casings bend, etc.. Ever notice how useful they are when the system is down? Paperweight... oh wait, the camera still works...but only you can look at it! (yes I know other features will work, but it is just a personal device at that point, no service....).

The modern phones are true tech wonders, but they are virtually useless without the support system operating correctly....and you pay and pay and pay and pay for that...for many folks, still paying for the phone when it is broken and dead (unless insured).

Top-of-the-line phones would cost thousands if not for the subsidizing built into the business model.

Reply
Jan 20, 2021 09:48:04   #
LEWHITE7747 Loc: 33773
 
AZNikon wrote:
You must be quite thrilled! I am very happy for you!


So sorry you use Nikon (there are some good cell phones out there) lol

Reply
 
 
Jan 20, 2021 10:19:07   #
camerapapi Loc: Miami, Fl.
 
It is easy to understand that many people use cell phones instead of cameras. It is more convenient and the camera is incorporated within the phone. The pandemic has been a decisive factor not only on camera sales but also on many of us limited to what we can do during this crisis with them.
I guess Olympus surprised us all when last year they announced the camera division was to be sold. Losses for the previous 3 years prompted that decision.

Did anyone ever thought Kodak would end up with bankruptcy? What about Agfa, arguably the largest manufacturer of film in Europe. Digital transformed everything photographic and we have reached a point where the market is super saturated. The new cameras are expensive and good lenses are also very expensive. I bet there has been a proliferation of the second hand market. Many people cannot afford the exorbitant prices Sony is asking for their cameras and lenses, not that they are the only ones to raise prices. It is said they are doing very well if selling their mirrorless better than other cameras is a sign of "prosperity."

We are living rough times, compounded by the pandemic. The market for professional cameras and lenses will continue to attract buyers but the amateur division will suffer. In my particular case and if I were in need of another camera I surely would go to the second hand market. It would be practical and economical. I do not need anything fancy to make pictures and I bet a majority of you are in my same shoes.

I have used Nikon cameras and lenses for over 55 years and they have served me well, I hope they find a solution to their financial problems.

Reply
Jan 20, 2021 10:46:20   #
Vince68 Loc: Wappingers Falls, NY
 
StevenG wrote:


I see you are from LI, so I guess you are a disgruntled Mets fan by the thumbs down you sent. I wish the Mets had signed Springer, getting him out of the AL. Now, the Yankees will have to face him 19 games during the regular season instead of the 7 games when he was with the Astros.

At least you have an owner now who is more willing to spend money on the team instead of the previous owners.

Reply
Jan 20, 2021 10:50:16   #
DJCard Loc: Northern Kentucky
 
billnikon wrote:
Phones are not generally used for studio work, professional weddings, professional family portraits, extreme closeups, wildlife, professional portraits, magazine layouts, catalogs, star and space photography, and many other area's to many to mention.
Yes, snapshots are popular with cell phones, they are easy to use, easy to transport, and do very well in a variety of areas. But they are no match for the high demands of hobbyists, series semi professional, and professional photographers.


Ditto! đź‘Ť

Reply
Jan 20, 2021 10:59:44   #
Peteso Loc: Blacks Hills
 
Where did you receive this information? This is how destructive rumors start. Attached is their annual report from their SEC annual filing, Form 10K, for Nikon's fiscal year year ended 3/31/2020. Suggest you look at the income statement, balance sheet and segment information, at a minimum. I was unable to find their quarterly report, Form 10Q, online for quarterly results since 3/31/2020, but their annual report for the fiscal year year ended 3/31/2021 should be available in a few months. They are a publicly traded company, and accurate information is readily available.

Attached file:
(Download)

Attached file:
(Download)

Reply
 
 
Jan 20, 2021 11:09:45   #
rcarol
 
LEWHITE7747 wrote:
Going to lose $720 million dollars this year---Canon to make '$616 million dollars.


Do you have a source for your information that you can share with the rest of the community?

Reply
Jan 20, 2021 11:19:04   #
budjordan1 Loc: Pittsburgh, Florida
 
RWebb76 wrote:
Not sure of source, but if true, very concerning. Canon is an imaging company with a pretty diverse portfolio of products. Nikon is not. Canon is worth about 28 Billion dollars. Nikon is a camera company is not valued at a fifth of that (from a quick internet search...might be wrong.)

As a dedicated Oly shooter, I am afraid that the entire camera market is in disarray. Unless there is some sort of innovative market disrupter, kind of like Tesla vs the car industry, then the number of camera manufactures will wane. I must say that when people ask me what camera system to enter into, I usually suggest Canon...They're one of the few big dogs on the porch.
Not sure of source, but if true, very concerning. ... (show quote)


It already happened, its the Cell Phone.

Reply
Jan 20, 2021 11:25:53   #
Blaster34 Loc: Florida Treasure Coast
 
custodian wrote:
Why are they loosing so much money


For the fiscal year ending in March of 2021, Nikon is expected to post a colossal 75 billion yen (~$720 million) loss compared to a surplus of 6.7 billion yen (~$65 million) in the previous fiscal year....Nikon’s video division specifically is expected to end this upcoming fiscal year operating at a deficit of 45 billion yen (~$433 million), which adds to the previous deficit of 17.1 billion yen (~$164 million) from March of 2020.

If Nikon does indeed lose that amount by March, it would be the worst scale financial loss the company has ever experienced.

Sure hope they can turn it around, competition is great for everyone, especially the consumer.

Reply
Jan 20, 2021 11:43:52   #
sippyjug104 Loc: Missouri
 
All durable goods markets face the same trials and tribulations. Customers are a consumable item and they must be replenished to make the product viable as well as profitable. Cameras are an item that one will buy a few times in their lifetime as well as the lenses. Business models need to be dynamic as well as being good at forecasting future trends.

Sony was a textbook example where they 'created' a market with products that no competition was in. The Sony Walkman was one such item. They created the technology, the item and created the sense of need which drove sales to them.

Most brands today fall into the "Me Too" category with very few distinguishing features other than price and that is a slippery slope to down...and out!

Reply
 
 
Jan 20, 2021 11:57:41   #
wdross Loc: Castle Rock, Colorado
 
custodian wrote:
Why are they loosing so much money


Nikon was too slow in changing over to mirrorless. Sony made the move faster and has even surpassed both Canon and Olympus which were 1st and 2nd in mirrorless camera sales last year. Right now, Sony, Canon, and Olympus have more than 70% of the mirrorless market. And that is still a shrinking market abet a slower shrinking market than the past.

Reply
Jan 20, 2021 12:21:35   #
wdross Loc: Castle Rock, Colorado
 
Mac wrote:
If you’re not sure of the source, why are you quoting it?


Nikon's financial woes are well known, but two of the sources are Toyo Keizai and BCN. Both of those are well respected industry sources. Both of these sources are being quoted by Pentapixel, another photographic source.

Reply
Jan 20, 2021 12:22:45   #
johnec Loc: Lancaster county, PA
 
pjeffers51 wrote:
My husband says not our fault. We have done our part to keep them afloat...


Amen! Me too

Reply
Jan 20, 2021 12:38:26   #
chasgroh Loc: Buena Park, CA
 
User ID wrote:
•YAWWWWN•

Howbout themMets huh ?


...yah, no sh*t.

Reply
Page <<first <prev 4 of 10 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.