LWW wrote:
Untrue, they control the house and that controls the purse ... and you would give them single party rule.
Are those MY words or YOURS?
Stop babbling.
LWW
Loc: Banana Republic of America
BooIsMyCat wrote:
Reread what you posted!
Stop babbling.
Then you should have no problem quoting where I said Washington was D or R ... but you won’t because you can’t, and you can’t because you’re lying.
What I said was that democrats broke treaties signed by Washington.
Shal I go further and explore your deceit even more, or will you actually learn something.
This is where you launch another attack and tell some more lies.
wilsondl2 wrote:
If he would have put a mask on when it started and asked all to do the same he may not have it now and a thousand or so lives would have been saved! - DAVE
Wet dreaming again? What did Dr Fauchi say to do? What did you do? Trump told ALL governors and mayors to control their
own masses. Trump was getting supplies made and shipped while pushing pharmaceuticals to make a vaccine.
LWW wrote:
Untrue, they control the house and that controls the purse ... and you would give them single party rule.
The GOP didn't do so well when they had "single party rule" for the first 24 months of trump's term, now did they?
LWW
Loc: Banana Republic of America
Shutterbug1697 wrote:
The GOP didn't do so well when they had "single party rule" for the first 24 months of trump's term, now did they?
Neither did the democrats, now did they.
You ought to learn how to structure a sentence.
You LIE again!
I said the Democrats are not in control - and currently, they are NOT!
You turn around and say: Untrue, they control the house and that controls the purse ... and you would give them single party rule.
The FIRST half of your dribble is how it's supposed to work but, obviously, YOU have not been paying attention to what is currently going on!
The SECOND half of your dribble is another LIE in which YOU decided to WRONGLY interpret my comments. I have NEVER stated any such thing! I have NEVER even implied such a stupid idea.
LWW wrote:
Neither did the democrats, now did they.
Why do you dwell on the PAST?
No one can change the past. We can, however, change the future.
LWW wrote:
I am not a republican, I am not a democrat, I am a libertarian.
Why is that so difficult for you to comprehend.
All of you dribble up until just the other day has been in support of Chump.
As for being a libertarian, what does that get you?
I would have NO problem with a third party running for office nationally but, the way our government is set up, "Libertarian" is nothing more than code for "Stay home, Don't vote". The reason I say this is because, you MIGHT get a Libertarian elected in a local election but, in a national election, they are completely ignored as far as the ending vote count goes.
My ballot has one Libertarian and one Progressive listed. I would bet that they don't get more than 100 votes total - combined, in my county.
MONEY has become the over-riding factor in WHO gets elected!
And WHAT party is responsible for this? Hint - It AIN'T the Libertarian party! It's the Republican party. They were the ones who passed the rule that big money has no boundaries. Neither the Republicans NOR the Democrats want a third party but, those in government who oppose a third party, are looking at that issue strictly from a power perspective.
LWW
Loc: Banana Republic of America
That’s so cute that you believe there is a small gubmint party in the uniparty system.
And, no, EVERYONE doesn’t lie .., but YOU do.
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.