Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main Photography Discussion
Search for compact/pocket camera upgrade
Page <prev 2 of 3 next>
Jul 13, 2020 09:03:07   #
47greyfox Loc: on the edge of the Colorado front range
 
Wingpilot wrote:


Thanks.... sure enough, there it is! 🥴🤓🥺🧐

Reply
Jul 13, 2020 10:08:36   #
motionbymarvin
 
You have described the Panasonic GX85 which I own. Compliments my G9 plus all the Panasonic and Olympus micro 4/3 lenses available for it.. You won't regret buying one.

Reply
Jul 13, 2020 10:20:24   #
photoman43
 
See if the info at this links helps. The site has other search tool too.


http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/buying-guide-best-compact-zoom-cameras

Reply
 
 
Jul 13, 2020 11:44:19   #
mffox Loc: Avon, CT
 
The Panasonic Lumix ZS 70 meets all of your requirements.

Reply
Jul 13, 2020 13:26:06   #
xt2 Loc: British Columbia, Canada
 
Bison Bud wrote:
I have been using a Canon G9 for my compact camera for quite some time and am now considering an upgrade to compliment my DLSR. I've done quite a bit of research online, but just can't seem to find one that has all the features I'd like to have in a compact and wonder if anyone out there has any recommendations. The key features I would like to have are:

1. At least a 1" sensor. Bigger is better, but this generally means less zoom range, bigger overall size, etc.
2. A quality built-in Viewfinder. This is a must have for me, I'm not interested in an add on viewfinder!
3. A quality, fast lens with a viable zoom range of 5X or better, f/2.8 to f/11 or better.
4. Typical exposure controls, Auto, Program, full manual, A-Priority, S-Priority, and Program modes.
5. Fully articulated screen. I might settle for a tiltable screen, but would much prefer the fully articulated.
6. Fast, preferably phase detect auto focus system.
7. At least 1080p video capabilities, preferably with good auto track focus.
8. Built in flash and/or hotshoe to mount one.
8. Truly pocket sized body. Whether sealed would be a plus, but not a deal breaker.
9. I would like to keep the price under $1000.00, but will consider revising that for the right camera.

Anyway, I so far haven't found anything that really meets these criteria and I'll probably have to settle for something less. I currently have some interest in the Sony RX-100 series and the Lumix ZS-100, as possible runners-up. Any further suggestions would be appreciated and further researched! Good luck and good shooting to all.
I have been using a Canon G9 for my compact camera... (show quote)


Basically, other than cost, the Fuji X100V is your answer to virtually all your questions. If the $1,000 limit must be adhered to grab the almost equally good Fuji X100F.

Cheers!

Reply
Jul 13, 2020 13:44:09   #
rcarol
 
User ID wrote:
Forget ZS100. I use one routinely. It’s only half the tool it claims to be. Given that I already own it, I use the half that meets expectations. Your wish list suggests your expectations are even grander than mine were.


I have the ZS100 and find it to be everything that it claims to be. Other than not having an articulating LCD screen, it meets the OP's requirements. Perhaps a list stating the shortcomings of the ZS100 would better serve the OP rather than a blanket statement like, "Forget ZS100".

Reply
Jul 13, 2020 15:16:32   #
JohnR Loc: The Gates of Hell
 
Bison Bud wrote:
I have been using a Canon G9 for my compact camera for quite some time and am now considering an upgrade to compliment my DLSR. I've done quite a bit of research online, but just can't seem to find one that has all the features I'd like to have in a compact and wonder if anyone out there has any recommendations. The key features I would like to have are:

1. At least a 1" sensor. Bigger is better, but this generally means less zoom range, bigger overall size, etc.
2. A quality built-in Viewfinder. This is a must have for me, I'm not interested in an add on viewfinder!
3. A quality, fast lens with a viable zoom range of 5X or better, f/2.8 to f/11 or better.
4. Typical exposure controls, Auto, Program, full manual, A-Priority, S-Priority, and Program modes.
5. Fully articulated screen. I might settle for a tiltable screen, but would much prefer the fully articulated.
6. Fast, preferably phase detect auto focus system.
7. At least 1080p video capabilities, preferably with good auto track focus.
8. Built in flash and/or hotshoe to mount one.
8. Truly pocket sized body. Whether sealed would be a plus, but not a deal breaker.
9. I would like to keep the price under $1000.00, but will consider revising that for the right camera.

Anyway, I so far haven't found anything that really meets these criteria and I'll probably have to settle for something less. I currently have some interest in the Sony RX-100 series and the Lumix ZS-100, as possible runners-up. Any further suggestions would be appreciated and further researched! Good luck and good shooting to all.
I have been using a Canon G9 for my compact camera... (show quote)


Just wondering - are you serious? Fast lenses + larger sensors do not equal a "truly pocket sized body" cameras. Apart from that you're asking for an Olympus OM-D E-M5 or similar.

Reply
 
 
Jul 13, 2020 16:19:47   #
jimpitt
 
I have also been searching for a replacement to my Leica C-Lux "shirtpocket."
After much research, I am leaning to the Sony RX series.

Reply
Jul 13, 2020 16:30:17   #
Toment Loc: FL, IL
 
One vote for the RX100vi...

Reply
Jul 13, 2020 16:42:00   #
Wingpilot Loc: Wasilla. Ak
 
JohnR wrote:
Just wondering - are you serious? Fast lenses + larger sensors do not equal a "truly pocket sized body" cameras. Apart from that you're asking for an Olympus OM-D E-M5 or similar.


The Canon G5X II and the Sony RX100 line of compact cameras have 1” type sensors and reasonably fast lenses. The Canon’s are f/1.8-2.8, as do the Son RX100, II, III,IV, and V. The RX100VI and VII have f/2.8-4.4 lenses. All of these are truly pocket sized cameras.

Reply
Jul 13, 2020 17:20:05   #
JohnR Loc: The Gates of Hell
 
Wingpilot wrote:
The Canon G5X II and the Sony RX100 line of compact cameras have 1” type sensors and reasonably fast lenses. The Canon’s are f/1.8-2.8, as do the Son RX100, II, III,IV, and V. The RX100VI and VII have f/2.8-4.4 lenses. All of these are truly pocket sized cameras.


Conceded - although I don't consider 1" a larger sensor I don't have any experience of the Canon but did find the Sony pop up viewfinder extremely fiddly and annoying.

Reply
 
 
Jul 13, 2020 18:25:02   #
Wanderer2 Loc: Colorado Rocky Mountains
 
Sony RX100 VI or VII. Unsurpassed imgage quality in a truly pocketable camera.

Reply
Jul 13, 2020 19:09:47   #
User ID
 
rcarol wrote:
I have the ZS100 and find it to be everything that it claims to be. Other than not having an articulating LCD screen, it meets the OP's requirements. Perhaps a list stating the shortcomings of the ZS100 would better serve the OP rather than a blanket statement like, "Forget ZS100".

Details just lead to nit picky arguments. The blanket statement is solid.

If the OP needs specifics he can PM me. Other than that, the OP’s wish list quite clearly calls for a decidedly better tool than the ZS100.

There’s plenty of mention of the GX85 in this thread. The GX85 was my casual grab and go “toy” until I tried the ZS100 as an even smaller “toy”. After a month with the ZS100 I went back to the GX85.

Reply
Jul 13, 2020 19:14:04   #
rcarol
 
User ID wrote:
Details just lead to nit picky arguments. The blanket statement is solid.

If the OP needs specifics he can PM me. Other than that, the OP’s wish list quite clearly calls for a decidedly better tool than the ZS100.

There’s plenty of mention of the GX85 in this thread. The GX85 was my casual grab and go “toy” until I tried the ZS100 as an even smaller “toy”. After a month with the ZS100 I went back to the GX85.

Details also separate truth from fiction.

Reply
Jul 13, 2020 19:35:06   #
User ID
 
JohnR wrote:
Just wondering - are you serious? Fast lenses + larger sensors do not equal a "truly pocket sized body" cameras. Apart from that you're asking for an Olympus OM-D E-M5 or similar.

AMEN !!! Squeezing a real camera down to so-called pocket size rarely delivers a decent result, and those rare exceptions cost real money. The OMD EM5 that you mentioned represents the minimum realistic size of real cameras.

Reply
Page <prev 2 of 3 next>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.