Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main Photography Discussion
Nikon D500 xdq card 16-80 lens
Page <prev 2 of 4 next> last>>
Jul 1, 2020 10:09:06   #
wetreed
 
The 16-80 lens is a no brainer , it’s a great lens . I really love mine and very happy I got mine with the D 500.

Reply
Jul 1, 2020 10:11:32   #
fetzler Loc: North West PA
 
billnikon wrote:
The 16-80 2.8-4 is on my D500 when I am around family, gives the same coverage area as my 24-120 F4 FX lens on my D850. That's why I like it so much, that 24-120 range cover's almost everything I need.
And, it is a LOT lighter than my 24-120.
That lens hood is especially designed to disengage it you drop your lens, saving the lens and the hood, GO NIKON.


I agree this is a great lens for general photography. I is on my camera almost all of the time.

Reply
Jul 1, 2020 10:30:51   #
photoman43
 
I use either Lexar or Sony XQD cards in my D500 and D850. My card reader is a Sony XQD/SD card reader model MRW-E90. It comes with a well made USB 3 cable. If you do a lot of AF-C shooting at High, make sure the cards you use (SD and XQD) have fast read and write speeds and that the card reader and cable interface allows for fast image downloads. The Sony card reader I use does.

Since I shoot with FX and DX models my lenses are mostly all FX. For me, I see no need to get a FX and DX lens for the same focal length range.

Reply
 
 
Jul 1, 2020 10:35:03   #
Charlie C Loc: North Liberty, IA
 
Using DX format depends on requirements. When concerned about noise or cropping, FX is best. If you must post crop, the number of pixels are reduced. Full frame sensors handle low light best, as does fast lenses that allows the lowest ISO possible in low light situations. The sharpest image of an f4 lens most likely is 5.6, maybe f8. I use both FX and DX but it depends on lighting and if it is a still or action shot. The only thing that changes from a DX to FX is the field of view. A 100mm lens on a DX is still 100mm lens, not 150mm.
It is best to move closer to the subject if possible.

Reply
Jul 1, 2020 13:48:17   #
dreff Loc: Bow, WA
 
I owned a 16-85 for years which was a decent zoom on a D5300. Then I saw an article with landscape photos in a photography review mag shot with the 16-80 and I was blown away. Couldn't find a review (DXOMark) but bought used on this site. It's been ok but not a substantial improvement over the 16-85 considering the cost difference. The mag pics were probably shot with an advanced or possibly full frame camera.

Reply
Jul 1, 2020 16:21:51   #
rangel28
 
motionbymarvin wrote:
Just purchased a used Nikon D500 with a 12,000 shutter count and 2 year warranty. New seems to be scarce at this time. Local camera shop had this one.
Any opinions on the 16-80 f2.8-80 lens?
Also, suggestions on what xdq card and reader. Bought this mostly for wild life. Thanks.


I have always gotten good results with the 16mm-80mm lens on the D500. The lens hood is kind of big, and the lens is not light, but it's a good solid performer and great as a walk around lens. Never had any focusing issues and results are sharp throughout the range. I bought the Sony 64GB XQD card and reader and have never had any issues with either. The card reader also reads SD cards.

Reply
Jul 1, 2020 16:34:27   #
Hamltnblue Loc: Springfield PA
 
Agree with the 16-80 2.8-4 lens. I had one on a D7500. It's a great, sharp walk around lens.
Equivalent to a 24-120

Reply
 
 
Jul 1, 2020 18:10:02   #
GLSmith Loc: Tampa, Fl
 
Nikon 18-300 lens is a fantastic zoom lens not too expensive

Reply
Jul 1, 2020 18:27:04   #
tcthome Loc: NJ
 
Randyfrieder wrote:
I don’t want to start a war, but... if you ever think that you might go full frame, I suggest only getting full frame (better quality, like gold band), Nikon lenses. They will be fully interchangeable between the D500 and a Nikon full frame body, and, at full frame on the full frame body.
That’s what I have always done done and now with D850 and D810, I am glad that I did, I didn’t need to get any new lenses!!! And the advantage of using the same lenses on different bodies, is your muscle memory. You are already familiar with them, not two different sets for different cameras.
BTW: if you plan on staying at DX size, please ignore all of the above!!!
Best of luck and take many great images!!
I don’t want to start a war, but... if you ever th... (show quote)


I agree!

Reply
Jul 1, 2020 18:28:01   #
tcthome Loc: NJ
 
Your going to want a longer lens for most wildlife.

Reply
Jul 1, 2020 19:09:38   #
racerrich3 Loc: Los Angeles, Ca.
 
CO wrote:
I read about the Nikon XQD cards in a photography magazine. It seems that they're only available at camera stores in Japan right now. They should bring them over here to the US.


or buy from Nikon since they do sell it ? I checked their website recently. only 64 though.

Reply
 
 
Jul 1, 2020 19:11:56   #
racerrich3 Loc: Los Angeles, Ca.
 
motionbymarvin wrote:
I had the 16-85 on my D7200. Sold all crop frame equipment. Need to pick up another 16-85.


just curious, why did you sell all crop frame stuff ? isn't D500 crop ???

Reply
Jul 1, 2020 19:47:27   #
SuperflyTNT Loc: Manassas VA
 
racerrich3 wrote:
just curious, why did you sell all crop frame stuff ? isn't D500 crop ???


It sounds to me like he sold all his crop stuff before he bought the D500, now he wants to replace that lens.

Reply
Jul 1, 2020 22:10:14   #
augieg27 Loc: Central California
 
CO wrote:
I have two D500's. I had purchased the Nikon 16-80mm f/2.8-4. I was disappointed. It's a $500 to $600 lens that sells for $1000. I already had the previous 16-85mm f/3.5-5.6 lens. They seemed to have lowered the quality of the 16-80mm. It has noisy autofocus. Mine had a severe back focusing issue. You can tell that the build quality has been lowered. I ended up returning it. I found a camera store that still had one new 16-85mm f/3.5-5.6 lens. Now I have two of the 16-85mm f/3.5-5.6 lenses. I'm very happy with them.
I have two D500's. I had purchased the Nikon 16-80... (show quote)


Please allow me to get away from the main discussion, but being a novice I always am intrigue about a photographer owning several cameras including more than one of the same. I know there must be a reason but I am curious. Thank you.

Reply
Jul 1, 2020 22:52:05   #
dyximan
 
CO wrote:
I have two D500's. I had purchased the Nikon 16-80mm f/2.8-4. I was disappointed. It's a $500 to $600 lens that sells for $1000. I already had the previous 16-85mm f/3.5-5.6 lens. They seemed to have lowered the quality of the 16-80mm. It has noisy autofocus. Mine had a severe back focusing issue. You can tell that the build quality has been lowered. I ended up returning it. I found a camera store that still had one new 16-85mm f/3.5-5.6 lens. Now I have two of the 16-85mm f/3.5-5.6 lenses. I'm very happy with them.
I have two D500's. I had purchased the Nikon 16-80... (show quote)

Reply
Page <prev 2 of 4 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.