Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
General Chit-Chat (non-photography talk)
For those that don't believe Mormons are Christians
Page <<first <prev 14 of 16 next> last>>
Oct 1, 2012 15:35:18   #
wpromine
 
ngc1514 wrote:
mericando wrote:
Ok NGC - Now that is 1 of the stupidest answers I have ever heard from an evolutionist. Unless there is in the scientific world Intelligent Design, (or in truth God) there can be no predestination.

And you know this... how? You seem to be setting up a false dichotomy that the existence of free will or predestination requires some god figure. That's your assertion, so I'll let you support it. Obviously history shows us that firm believers in god are also in favor of predestination. Calvin, for one, but Augustine and Francis and Luther also accepted predestination.

But is god really necessary to accept the idea of predestination? Let's assume you have free will as do I. I decide, of my own free will, to carry you to the top of a tall building and drop you. Can your free will overcome the laws of physics or are you going to go SPLAT on the sidewalk 60 floors down? From the moment I let go, your free will was overpowered by the fact of gravity. Your abbreviated future is predestined by the my action and the planet's gravitational force.

That is an extreme example, but how do you know the same laws of physics, biochemistry and biology are not working at the microscopic level to shape that which you believe is free will? In other words, how can you show what you call free will isn't a simple illusion fabricated by the body and brain?


Quote:
According to your own statement there is no God or Intelligent Designer,

Nope, that's a statement lacking in veracity - it's not true. I have never said there is no god. What I claim is that whether god exists or not, he/she/it is irrelevant. Big difference! I'll accept your apology for making a false statement about what I have said.

Quote:
we all came from inanimate material and all the little atoms, molecules, amino acids, protein,cells etc, etc just happen to come together in the right sequence and viola' out comes life and then that life oozed out more life, then that life oozed out a different life form and other life forms came to be and so and so, and some became male life forms and other female, and some became dogs, cats, elephants, dinosaurs, fish, whales, sharks, octopi, snakes lions Oh, my, kept going until we got to this stage and then BOOOM life stopped evolving.(And I believe in fairy tales get real)
we all came from inanimate material and all the l... (show quote)

A kindergarten exposition on what science actually says. I assume you, like so many others who reject evolution, have never read a serious book on the subject. Your argument is an argument from ignorance. Not a strong logical position., but it appears the best you can muster.

Quote:
Really great scenario, but given the way you believe we came to be, there is no such thing as predestination. If you will check the meaning of predestination you will see it is associated with believers of God or gods.

Wrong again. The first definition in the OED reads:

"The action of predestinating, or fact of being predestinated; the ordaining or determination of events before they come to pass; pre-appointment by, or in the way of, fate or destiny; foreordination."

No mention of god at all. When I let you drop those 60 floors, god had nothing to do with your predestined mess on the flagstones below. You are working with a very limited view of predestination.

Quote:
And reading the foolishness of those that have closed their hearts and minds to the truth.


I do so wish you'd answer the interesting question of how you could determine if a group of people had free will or not before you scuttle off. I guess I am predestined to be disappointed by a lack of an answer.
quote=mericando Ok NGC - Now that is 1 of the st... (show quote)


You were not addressing your responses to the above posting to me, but, please, allow me to ask you, once again, to read "Mere Christianity". C.S. Lewis explains answers to several of your counter-points much more thoughtfully and logically than I. His answers are persuasive and address some of your exact questions. You are not "predestined to be disappointed by a lack of an answer" unless you choose to be.

Reply
Oct 1, 2012 17:52:54   #
mericando Loc: NASHVILLE TN
 
OED--Predestine
verb
[with object]
(of God) destine (someone) for a particular fate or purpose:
Calvinists believed that every person was predestined by God to go to heaven or to hell
determine (an outcome or course of events) in advance by divine will or fate:
(as adjective predestined)
our predestined end


predestination Pronunciation: /pri&#720;&#716;d&#603;st&#618;&#712;ne&#618;&#643;(&#601;)n/
Definition of predestination
noun
[mass noun]
(in Christian theology) the doctrine that God has ordained all that will happen, especially with regard to the salvation of some and not others. It has been particularly associated with the teachings of St Augustine of Hippo and of Calvin.
Origin:

Middle English: from ecclesiastical Latin praedestinatio(n-), from praedestinare 'make firm beforehand' (see predestinate)


Merriam Webster

Definition of predestination
noun
[mass noun]
(in Christian theology) the doctrine that God has ordained all that will happen, especially with regard to the salvation of some and not others. It has been particularly associated with the teachings of St Augustine of Hippo and of Calvin.
Origin:

Middle English: from ecclesiastical Latin praedestinatio(n-), from praedestinare 'make firm beforehand' (see predestinate)

Kindergarten explanation nope, paraphrasing some of the most notable scientists in the evolution/creation debates-explained in detail in a previous post.
Beliving in God = The post was directed to NCG -who stated that believing in God or the Bible was pure fairy tales -

Someone can thwart another's free will-if you decide to kill someone and it comes to be-You exercised your own free will and deprived someone else of their. Free will doesn't mean you are always going to get your way. I want to go one way on a trip, my husband another-however, the one driving usually gets their way.

Reply
Oct 1, 2012 20:33:34   #
ngc1514 Loc: Atlanta, Ga., Lancaster, Oh. and Stuart, Fl.
 
wpromine wrote:
You were not addressing your responses to the above posting to me, but, please, allow me to ask you, once again, to read "Mere Christianity". C.S. Lewis explains answers to several of your counter-points much more thoughtfully and logically than I. His answers are persuasive and address some of your exact questions. You are not "predestined to be disappointed by a lack of an answer" unless you choose to be.

Did you miss my response to your first mention of Lewis?

Quote:
Your assumption is that some of us haven't read Lewis or Josh McDowell and his Evidence that Demands a Verdict or Pierre Teilhard de Chardin's The Phenomena of Man or Augustine's City of God and others.

Probably not a safe assumption.

I was countering your assumption that I haven't already read it. It was not a safe assumption on your part.

Sorry if my wording confused you.

Reply
 
 
Oct 1, 2012 22:22:46   #
wpromine
 
ngc1514 wrote:
wpromine wrote:
You were not addressing your responses to the above posting to me, but, please, allow me to ask you, once again, to read "Mere Christianity". C.S. Lewis explains answers to several of your counter-points much more thoughtfully and logically than I. His answers are persuasive and address some of your exact questions. You are not "predestined to be disappointed by a lack of an answer" unless you choose to be.

Did you miss my response to your first mention of Lewis?

Quote:
Your assumption is that some of us haven't read Lewis or Josh McDowell and his Evidence that Demands a Verdict or Pierre Teilhard de Chardin's The Phenomena of Man or Augustine's City of God and others.

Probably not a safe assumption.

I was countering your assumption that I haven't already read it. It was not a safe assumption on your part.

Sorry if my wording confused you.
quote=wpromine You were not addressing your respo... (show quote)


Have you read it?

Reply
Oct 1, 2012 23:30:06   #
ngc1514 Loc: Atlanta, Ga., Lancaster, Oh. and Stuart, Fl.
 
wpromine wrote:
ngc1514 wrote:
wpromine wrote:
You were not addressing your responses to the above posting to me, but, please, allow me to ask you, once again, to read "Mere Christianity". C.S. Lewis explains answers to several of your counter-points much more thoughtfully and logically than I. His answers are persuasive and address some of your exact questions. You are not "predestined to be disappointed by a lack of an answer" unless you choose to be.

Did you miss my response to your first mention of Lewis?

Quote:
Your assumption is that some of us haven't read Lewis or Josh McDowell and his Evidence that Demands a Verdict or Pierre Teilhard de Chardin's The Phenomena of Man or Augustine's City of God and others.

Probably not a safe assumption.

I was countering your assumption that I haven't already read it. It was not a safe assumption on your part.

Sorry if my wording confused you.
quote=wpromine You were not addressing your respo... (show quote)


Have you read it?
quote=ngc1514 quote=wpromine You were not addres... (show quote)

That's what I said. Along with McDowell, Teilhard de Chardin, Kaufmann's Faith of a Heretic, Augustine's City of God and a pile of other christian apologetics.

I've also read Henry Morris, Duane Gish and Michael Behe.

Because turn about is fair play... what were the last books you read on evolution and cosmology?

Reply
Oct 1, 2012 23:49:49   #
docrob Loc: Durango, Colorado
 
Lmarc wrote:
SteveR wrote:
You can't be Christian until you meet the basic tests of Christian Orthodoxy. The first, of course, the understanding of the Godhead which was the first theological topic taken up and decided by the early Church. The early heresies can clearly be identified in cults still in existence today.


Please don't take this wrong. I'm not doubting your statements, but I'd like you to clear up a couple things for me if you will. I don't have time to verify them right now and you are obviously an astute biblical scholar.

1. Define Christian Orthodoxy.

2. When did the "early Church" take up these theological topics? I'm under the impression it was LONG after the Crucifiction.

3. What were some of these early heresies and what are some of the modern cults in which they can be identified? Again, I'm under the belief that those heresies named by the early church when it was evolving into the Catholic church were just about anything not agreed on by whatever pope was in power at the time, and several of those popes did not have the best interest of Christianity at heart.

I personally believe all of Christianity can be summed up in the Sermon on the Mount, Matt. Chapters 5, 6 and 7. Everything else seems to be interpretation, embellishment and opinion.
quote=SteveR You can't be Christian until you mee... (show quote)


the Church was formalized in 422 AD - 400 yrs after the death of christ.
What was kept and what was not had as much to do with the politics of the time as with the theology. Keep in mind the only theologian at this time was Augustine - also there was a split between what is not the Catholic Church and The Eastern Orthodox Church. The split was over the meaning of the resurrection. The Catholic position was to celebrate the pentient idea of JC's crucifiction - the Catholic Church decided they wished to emphasis his death. The Eastern Orthodox church felt the resurrection was more important.

your pick

Reply
Oct 2, 2012 01:08:00   #
SteveR Loc: Michigan
 
Sorry, Doc, but there are important points of theology based upon the Scriptures. We have already discussed the Trinity, which is based upon what Scripture says about the Father, Son, and Holy Spirit individually. The New Testament teaches salvation based upon faith alone, but the RCC turned from that, asserting that man assists in his salvation. It was the sale of indulgences that led Luther to leave the RCC and write the book Sole Fide.

Reply
 
 
Oct 2, 2012 02:12:17   #
docrob Loc: Durango, Colorado
 
SteveR wrote:
Sorry, Doc, but there are important points of theology based upon the Scriptures. We have already discussed the Trinity, which is based upon what Scripture says about the Father, Son, and Holy Spirit individually. The New Testament teaches salvation based upon faith alone, but the RCC turned from that, asserting that man assists in his salvation. It was the sale of indulgences that led Luther to leave the RCC and write the book Sole Fide.


Sorry Steve but the idea - the theology of the trinity was necessary to reconcile the biblical references to Jesus as the son and Jesus' references to the Holy Spirit with the OT concept of God as One - of god as being omnipotent, omnipresent, and omniscient. The theology is simply an attempt by men at that time in history who were trying to find an intellectual end run around very difficult and counter-intuitive narrative - i.e,. how to meld the OT god idea into the revelations attributed to Jesus such that the story could be read as one continuous "revealed his-story" and simultaneously explain how God (Yahwah / Jehova) who is described as One and unchangeable could have suddenly become 3.......did that mean the unchangeable One changed? Or that Scripture needed to be re-interpreted so all the new pieces fit?

Theology is the art and craft of intellectually making all the pieces fit.

By RCC I assume you mean the Catholic Church and will proceed accordingly. Catholic theology also biblically based and based on the works of Jesus posited the notion that faith is demonstrated in / through works. The idea that faith itself was grounded by acceptance of JC or Mary has remained consistent throughout Catholic theology.

Work based salvation - or what you interpret as "man assisting in his salvation," also has a biblical basis ("Lest you do this to the least of men, you do unto me") is conjoined with the idea that works demonstrate faith. This idea by the way - that human kind plays a critical role in "salvation" is shared by most if not all other faiths. The definition of "salvation" being open to investigation as it must be if one is to engage in theology.....

Martin Luther was rebelling against the corruption that had occurred within the Catholic Church with the practice of selling indulgences which were essentially "get out of hell" free cards paid for with gold. As you can see there are contemporary parallels with our society and many of our institutions today.

That said However, Luther's "revelation" was that man is redeemed by faith alone. Politically, this statement and 48 other Thesis thus nailed on the door ended the monopoly of christianity by one church....you might say Luther introduced religious competition into the market place.

Reply
Oct 2, 2012 03:23:40   #
SteveR Loc: Michigan
 
Sorry, Doc, I disagree. It's not just some attempt to make the pieces fit. It begins with sound Scriptural exegesis. You begin with what the Scripture says about God and also about each Person of the Trinity. Twist it as you may, you have to start with Scripture.

49 Theses? As I recall it was 95.

Reply
Oct 2, 2012 10:19:17   #
mericando Loc: NASHVILLE TN
 
People are the church, the building is a place where people of like beliefs gather. 1st church gather in homes relatively soon after Christ's resurrection. Man has muddle the water with all the rules and regulations, if it isn't in the Bible, which was translated from the Dead Sea Scrolls and other ancient manuscripts,then it is man made. Faith v works- Yes salvation is by God's grace, thru the death and ressurection of His Son. "For God so loved the world that He sent His Son.Whosoever believth in Him, shall not perish but have eternal life " Works-is an action that is taken in obediance and because of what Christ has done for me. My husband can love me and be married to me, but is He never shows me that he loves me, never does anything around the house, or goes to work, then I have to wonder does he really love me? Is his love for me dead-with out putting action behind our words, then it causes doubt did he really ever love me-He said the wedding vows but I see no results in his commitment. Which makes the vows seem dead. So it is with Christ, I do not judge, but scripture says we will know them by the fruit they bear- or in other words their actions speak louder than words. If you look around, you will see us giving both money and time. Sending cards to homebound, taking meals, helping a stranger change a tire, stopping to pick up a woman and a child walking in the rain. Helping teens in trouble. And yes, you will see us at times acting selfish, fighting among ourselves, turning our backs on some people, but rest assured, if we are truly a Christian, we squirm, make excuses, feel lost without the fellowship of God, and we come to our senses and ask to be forgiven and get back on the right track. We are human, not perfect, just striving to do what Christ commanded, follow His example until we reach our perfection in Heaven.
I know some thing this is a bunch of bull and you are entitled to your opinion. But your way of life is just as much a "fairy tale" as you seem to think my is.

I just pray that you all will come to know Him in a real way. If you don't, on judgement day you will remember your fellow photography buff and the things we talked about.

It doesn't have to be big theological words, or concept, Christ spoke in everyday language so everyone could understand.

Reply
Oct 2, 2012 11:17:03   #
docrob Loc: Durango, Colorado
 
SteveR wrote:
Sorry, Doc, I disagree. It's not just some attempt to make the pieces fit. It begins with sound Scriptural exegesis. You begin with what the Scripture says about God and also about each Person of the Trinity. Twist it as you may, you have to start with Scripture.

49 Theses? As I recall it was 95.


maybe it was 95 or I could have been thinking about Ketchup.

Again Steve, theology does not start and end with scripture. Theology starts with an idea about god and builds systematically upon the initial hypothesis or assumption. Of course there are scriptural references and as you well know within a text such as the bible one can find support for any position including the raping of one's daughter.......so.

Question for you - who are your favorite theologians?

Reply
 
 
Oct 2, 2012 13:26:13   #
dachs
 
[quote=Bazamac]
mericando wrote:

there is no God or Intelligent Designer, we all came from inanimate material and all the little atoms, molecules, amino acids, protein,cells etc, etc just happen to come together in the right sequence and viola' out comes life and then that life oozed out more life, then that life oozed out a different life form and other life forms came to be and so and so, and some became male life forms and other female, and some became dogs, cats, elephants, dinosaurs, fish, whales, sharks, octopi, snakes lions Oh, my, kept going until we got to this stage and then BOOOM life stopped evolving.?
br there is no God or Intelligent Designer, we al... (show quote)


possibly the only graspable argument against Evolution;

if we accept entropy and the general idea of the stuff of Universe settling down to chaotic low energy states, how come here on Earth (and some meteorites, maybe Mars soon) shew evidence of simple early critters evolving into high level organisms? I omit from my argument totally all in the political classes.

Secondly I notice many folk don't read back thru the thread, shame, but not surprised. In doing so my eyes have been widened just a little by both sides, it is worth checking through.

Lastly, why is the title including only Mormons? What happened to Jehovah's Witnesses, Hindi, American Indians, Australian Aborigines? Odd, to me.

Can't everyone accept that until we have run Science to a much higher point of total understanding (Grand Unification Theory maybe) and until the Day of Judgement (whichever is first), we none of us know and all of both sides of belief is based on a kind of faith?

ps edit - so how come viruses keep mutating/evolving? Upsetting that..... :-(

Reply
Oct 2, 2012 14:12:56   #
ngc1514 Loc: Atlanta, Ga., Lancaster, Oh. and Stuart, Fl.
 
Quote:
if we accept entropy and the general idea of the stuff of Universe settling down to chaotic low energy states, how come here on Earth (and some meteorites, maybe Mars soon) shew evidence of simple early critters evolving into high level organisms? I omit from my argument totally all in the political classes.

Entropy concerns itself with closed systems. The earth is not a closed system, but receives copious amounts of energy from the sun. There is only one closed system of which we are aware and that is the universe itself. Increases in entropy in one part of the universe will decrease entropy in another. The sun is running down, albeit slowly, and it is allowing an increase in order on the planets.

Reply
Oct 2, 2012 14:16:52   #
dachs
 
ngc1514 wrote:
Quote:
if we accept entropy and the general idea of the stuff of Universe settling down to chaotic low energy states, how come here on Earth (and some meteorites, maybe Mars soon) shew evidence of simple early critters evolving into high level organisms? I omit from my argument totally all in the political classes.

Entropy concerns itself with closed systems. The earth is not a closed system, but receives copious amounts of energy from the sun. There is only one closed system of which we are aware and that is the universe itself. Increases in entropy in one part of the universe will decrease entropy in another. The sun is running down, albeit slowly, and it is allowing an increase in order on the planets.
quote if we accept entropy and the general idea o... (show quote)


yeah ta, true, quite right;

exposes another thing, we view our Universe very locally (''cos that's where we are) and that may not be the true Laws of Everywhere.

Point stands though, for here and now

Reply
Oct 2, 2012 14:17:51   #
ngc1514 Loc: Atlanta, Ga., Lancaster, Oh. and Stuart, Fl.
 
Quote:
ps edit - so how come viruses keep mutating/evolving? Upsetting that.....

Everything is evolving. All fossils, with the exception of those critters that go extinct, are transitional fossils.

Just remember the definition of evolution - the scientific definition of evolution and not some crap from the creationist - is simply "a change in allele frequency of a gene over time."

You'll not find any creationists arguing against that because it's observed in labs every day while explaining why viruses, and every other species of plant or animal, keep evolving.

The Change in Allele Frequency of a Gene over Time.

Simple, huh?

Reply
Page <<first <prev 14 of 16 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
General Chit-Chat (non-photography talk)
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.