SuperflyTNT wrote:
For serious photo printing HP isn’t even close to Canon. Don’t denigrate the company because of your own shortcomings.
Accurate observation here... HP makes office printers. They used to make good office printers. They sell what they say are photo printers, but they are the least respected of the big three inkjet printer manufacturers.
Canon and Epson both make excellent machines. The highest end Epsons are preferred by those who do production printing. Keep them VERY busy, and they won't clog too often. Canon makes great midrange and low end photo printers. Hobbyists are probably better off with a Pro 100 or Pro 10.
It is silly to expect good photo quality from a CMYK office-grade printer. Yes, you can get acceptable prints from some $100 inkjet office printers, if you use OEM inks, and the right profile and paper combination. But that isn't recommended.
Inkjet printing is NEVER cheap. We often see folks on UHH ask for a "good, cheap inkjet printer," or "good, cheap, third-party inks". Folks who want that should just use labs.
Reasons for inkjet printing include:
Privacy
Precise control of quality (if you understand and practice good color management principles)
Need for immediacy
Need for special substrates (plastic, metal, art board, canvas, etc.)
Need for wide array of paper surfaces (glossy, matte, silk, metallic, RC, fiber, baryta, cotton rag paper, etc.)
Need for the widest possible color gamut (using multiple colors of ink — 6 to 12)
Need for the best print longevity possible (using solid pigment-based inks)
Need for very large prints (40" by 60" is routine; some printers go larger)