Red Plover wrote:
Need to pick Hoggers' brains. My old Epson colour printer has just died, it only lasted 20 years. Now need a new colour printer for photographs, possible a reasonably priced Canon.
Grateful thanks for any recommendations and/or of experience of using Canon printers.
I got a Canon Pro-100 several years ago and have been happy with it. This is a 13" wide, 8 color printer and makes wonderful photographic prints. It's fairly large and uses dye-based inks that Canon claims will last for 100+ years. Currently costs $140, after a $200 mail-in rebate. This includes a full set of inks plus a 50-sheet pack of 13x19" paper. After several years of use, sometimes sitting for a couple weeks between uses, I have never had a paper misfeed or an ink clog. It just plain "works" every time. It even goes into sleep mode and wakes back up automatically. My only complaint is that the inks are fairly expensive. A full set of them costs about $125. And the cartridges aren't very big.
The Canon Pro-10 is also 13" wide and about the same size & weight, even similar appearance. But it costs more... $500 after a $200 mail-in rebate. It's a 10-color printer that uses pigment-based inks Canon claims will have 200+ years life, when printed on archival papers. The cost for a full set of inks is about $135 and the cartridges are similar size.
Personally I prefer the look of the dye-based inks on gloss, semi-gloss and luster papers.... And the pigment-based inks on matte papers. (I currently use an HP B9180, 8-color, pigment, 13" wide and similar size, but uses much larger ink cartridges, but they are also about 3X the cost of the Canon. The HP printer was discontinued a few years ago and inks are getting difficult to find. I will probably eventually replace it with the Canon Pro-10.)
I had been using a smaller Epson for a number of years, before getting the Pro-100. That old Epson became highly prone to paper jams and always required cleanings for clogged ink jets. I wasted tons of ink running it through cleaning cycles every time I used it. A 6-color, dye-based printer, a full set of inks cost around $75 and were roughly the same size or smaller than the ones used in the Pro-100. This was my "office" and "proof/thumbnail catalog" printer. I also had used several of the 13" wide Epsons for finished enlargements.
One reason I stopped using Epson was that I objected to the pre-programmed "printer failure" that older model had. I don't know if Epson still does this, but that printer was actually programmed to shut itself down after a certain number of prints and send an "end of life, replace printer" message. This was utter BS. Searching online I found hacking apps that could be used to reset the printer and bring it "back to life". I did that three times, extending it's use by 4X. After the first lifetime, as prescribed by Epson, I guess it was a "zombie" printer... "back from the dead". It always had problems with ink clogs, even during it's earlier lives and while always using the OEM inks. But after the last time I resurrected it, problems with misfeeds also became common. So it was finally time to let it go to inkjet heaven or hell.
I found the programmed, planned obsolescence of that Epson pretty galling. We joke about cameras and phones and cars shutting down when a new model comes out, forcing you to buy. Epson actually tried to do it with their printers! That printer easily had 3X the life that Epson programmed it for (Admittedly, I was pushing it getting a fourth lifetime out of it). I can't help but wonder how many people took those "printer failure" messages seriously, went out and bought a new printer, while junking one that would work just as well as always! I don't know if Epson still does this with their printers. I hope not.