Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main Photography Discussion
Sigma 60-600 not focusing with Polarizer....Why?
Page <prev 2 of 4 next> last>>
Aug 15, 2019 22:45:27   #
imagemeister Loc: mid east Florida
 
User ID wrote:
A camera that can AF a 5.6 lens will AF it
even in dim light. A camera that cannot
AF an f/11 lens will not AF that lens even
on a sunny day. Polarizers do not change
your f/stop. TCs do change your f/stop.
Very simple .... but apparently not to all
of us :-(

As to "purposes of exposure", who cares ?
Exposure is not at all related to focus. I
can focus perfectly but expose improperly,
and I can also make perfectly exposed out
of focus images. No connection between
the two functions.
A camera that can AF a 5.6 lens will AF it br ev... (show quote)


Polarizers do change your f-stop - oniy it is just not communicated to the camera's "brain" - like an extender is through the lens' mount pins....so it will still TRY to AF ....

Reply
Aug 15, 2019 22:50:08   #
bleirer
 
Interesting article on autofocus here. https://photographylife.com/dslr-autofocus-modes-explained
It doesnt address polarizers but does discuss impact of low light in phase/contrast detection. Suggests using single center af point or live view, among other ideas.

Reply
Aug 16, 2019 00:28:31   #
captxmas Loc: San Francisco Bay Area
 
To clarify..... I am using a Nikon D-500. I have tried boosting ISO to experiment and change to different f-stops. The whole range for sample shots. Without the CPL, all shots are tack sharp (or close to it). With the filter ALL shot AF does occur but does not get to the Sharp point. Imagine stopping just short of focus and just a little blurry. Its as though the lens is doing what it is supposed to do but falling short. Maybe the filter is acting like another lens element?

Shots are being taken outside in full sun with targets at different ranges and colors around my yard 6' - 40' distance.

Hope this helps identify what might be going on.

Reply
 
 
Aug 16, 2019 06:04:37   #
John N Loc: HP14 3QF Stokenchurch, UK
 
I have known this to happen with CANON lenses, not necessarily with polarising filters either. My neighbour sent an e-bay purchase lens to CANON. They returned it (with the filter removed) and cleaned it up and it's worked perfectly ever since.

Reply
Aug 16, 2019 08:18:31   #
camerapapi Loc: Miami, Fl.
 
Dark filters, specially if using matrix metering tend to fool the AF and the meter. May I suggest that you AF and take an exposure WITHOUT the filter and then keep the camera in manual focus and fit the filter on the lens while adding two full stops to compensate for the filter factor at full polarization.

Reply
Aug 16, 2019 08:23:55   #
imagemeister Loc: mid east Florida
 
camerapapi wrote:
Dark filters, specially if using matrix metering tend to fool the AF and the meter. May I suggest that you AF and take an exposure WITHOUT the filter and then keep the camera in manual focus and fit the filter on the lens while adding two full stops to compensate for the filter factor at full polarization.



Reply
Aug 16, 2019 08:59:12   #
gwilliams6
 
imagemeister wrote:
You loose 2 stops of light with the polarizer - just like with a 2X extender ! So the AF WILL be affected !

The other "problem" using any filter with long focal length lenses is that focusing issues are exacerbated .....and each filter and lens has a unique/different reaction regarding this. I cannot explain all the physics involved with this - just know that it happens ! and, is why I use any filter as a last resort....
.


Just FYI the best new circular polarizers have much better transmission of light and you only lose one stop nowadays. Some circular polarizers may cause an issue with some camera's autofocus abilities, that is a known fact,sadly.

Reply
 
 
Aug 16, 2019 09:35:41   #
Brokenland
 
captxmas wrote:
Greetings all, I have been a long time user of polarizing filters as I enjoy the finished images enhanced color without reflections. I use them on my Nikon 24-70, 70-200 and until recently my Sigma 50-500 with great success.

The 50-500 has been passed on to my son and I opted to purchase the Sigma 60-600. I love it and its performance with one exception. I have tried to use two different 105mm polarizers and the lens will not deliver a sharp image until it is removed.

Can anyone let me know why this happens? They have been Circular polarizers as I have used in the past.

call me puzzled.
Greetings all, I have been a long time user of pol... (show quote)


Please make sure that the filter is legit, and if you're in auto focus mode, you may need what is know as CPL polarization filter. Read what I've said here: https://www.uglyhedgehog.com/t-603730-2.html#10390290
The new Gobe Polarization filter technically listed as an official "CPL" will arrive later today.

Edit: here's a quick tip to check the filter, Remove the filter from your lens, hold it in front of the computer screen then slowly rotate the outer ring, Check to see if the filter gradually goes from light to dark and watch the window's icons on the screen they should go nearly or complete black, if they do not your filter could be counterfeit, But we would need to check other areas of the filter and packaging to verify.

Reply
Aug 16, 2019 09:45:38   #
genesampson
 
I had a similar problem on a Nikon 80-400. When I took the filter off it was fine. The camera wouldn't focus because of the low amount of light hitting the sensor.

Reply
Aug 16, 2019 09:46:16   #
dsmeltz Loc: Philadelphia
 
amfoto1 wrote:
You didn't mention what camera you have, but some are unable to focus when there's not sufficient light. The 60-600m is an f/4.5-f/6.3 lens... As a result, at the longer focal lengths of the lens, and with a C-pol added that's costing as much as 1.5 to 2.25 stops of light loss (depending upon how strong effect you dial in), you have the equivalent of only about f/10 or f/13. r

Depending upon the camera you are using, that might not be enough light to AF. Or, you may have to limit the camera to use only specific AF points that are able to focus with less light.

Yes, the lens is still f/5.6 or f/6.3.... However, Imagemeister is correct. It's the light lost to the C-Pol filter that makes the camera unable to focus... The same as it's the loss of light when you add a teleconverter that makes AF impossible (again, it depends upon the camera and the AF system it uses). It doesn't matter whether the light is lost to a dark filter or to a smaller effective maximum aperture.... When there's not enough light for the camera to focus, it won't focus!

There are "high transmissive" C-Pol now, which aren't as dark as standard C-Pol. They give similar polarizing effect, but with less loss of light. Not a lot different though.... I'd estimate there's maybe 2/3 or 1/2 stop less light loss.
You didn't mention what camera you have, but some ... (show quote)


Yes the filter makes it unable to focus, but the aperture is still in the range where it attempts to focus. The camera is just not getting enough light to succeed. The OP said:

captxmas wrote:
I have tried to use two different 105mm polarizers and the lens will not deliver a sharp image until it is removed.


The images, while not "sharp" would seem to be view-able if not usable. So it seems the AF is trying to work. It would have been nice to see the image and know the settings used.

Reply
Aug 16, 2019 09:56:50   #
bleirer
 
Steve Perry had a nice video on focus problems. One hint I wouldn't have thought of, clean the af sensors!

https://backcountrygallery.com/solving-autofocus-problems-8-common-af-problems-and-solutions/

Reply
 
 
Aug 16, 2019 10:19:36   #
dsmeltz Loc: Philadelphia
 
bleirer wrote:
Steve Perry had a nice video on focus problems. One hint I wouldn't have thought of, clean the af sensors!

https://backcountrygallery.com/solving-autofocus-problems-8-common-af-problems-and-solutions/


Cleaning the focus sensor? I never thought about that! I just do the image sensor.

Thanks

Reply
Aug 16, 2019 10:31:39   #
Blair Shaw Jr Loc: Dunnellon,Florida
 
With some large lenses ,it would appear that one has to pre-meter the light before the application of a filter because of the loss of f-stop in some instances and manually add or subtract exposure accordingly. This seems to be the case for 2nd party lenses and tele-converters and especially N.D. filters on these lenses.

Auto focus would also be affected and the camera may never achieve it as a result. I wish I knew more about this and hope others will chime-in with the correct answers. Trial & Error are what I wind-up doing usually and that's not the smartest way but it eventually yields a result. At least with digital , we get instant results and don't to wait for film processing any more....like we used to. Those were the days !

Good luck to you.

Reply
Aug 16, 2019 11:10:02   #
RRS Loc: Not sure
 
dsmeltz wrote:
Cleaning the focus sensor? I never thought about that! I just do the image sensor.

Thanks


I could be wrong but I don't think it's an easy thing to do because of it's location.

Reply
Aug 16, 2019 11:13:27   #
dsmeltz Loc: Philadelphia
 
RRS wrote:
I could be wrong but I don't think it's an easy thing to do because of it's location.


The Steve Perry link posted earlier by bleirer shows how.

https://backcountrygallery.com/solving-autofocus-problems-8-common-af-problems-and-solutions/

Reply
Page <prev 2 of 4 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.