Miracles
Mar 29, 2019 16:53:43 #
scooter1
Loc: Yacolt, Wa.
fantom wrote:
The graph implies that cameras were invented in 1888.
That however is false cuz I've seen photos of Nancy Pelosi that precede that date.
That however is false cuz I've seen photos of Nancy Pelosi that precede that date.
Mar 29, 2019 17:36:10 #
Mar 29, 2019 19:39:56 #
Mar 29, 2019 22:01:48 #
drmike99 wrote:
Am I peculiarly dense? What does this graph imply? Also, cameras were invented well before 1888. What did Matthew Brady photograph the Civil War with?
His cell phone.
Mar 30, 2019 12:20:57 #
That would depend largely on your "world" view.
If you believe that the universe was created out of nothing by nothing and everything within in it has no apparent purpose, that all life came about by random mutations (evolution), then yes, there is a very distinct possibility that there is life somewhere else in the universe. But because of the vast distanced between us and them, we may never discover them.
But if your world view is one that says the universe did have a beginning, that it was not created by no one but by a someone (God), then who's to say that God didn't create this entire universe for us to observe and if He wished to create it with our planet being the only one with life on it, who are we to argue?
If you believe that the universe was created out of nothing by nothing and everything within in it has no apparent purpose, that all life came about by random mutations (evolution), then yes, there is a very distinct possibility that there is life somewhere else in the universe. But because of the vast distanced between us and them, we may never discover them.
But if your world view is one that says the universe did have a beginning, that it was not created by no one but by a someone (God), then who's to say that God didn't create this entire universe for us to observe and if He wished to create it with our planet being the only one with life on it, who are we to argue?
Mar 30, 2019 12:31:04 #
larryepage
Loc: North Texas area
dsmeltz wrote:
The idea is that before events were frequently recorded by photos, it was easy to claim that something amazing had happened. After cameras were common, it became nearly impossible until Photoshop made it easy to manipulate reality.
Did you really need that explained? I mean really?
Did you really need that explained? I mean really?
I am firstborn in my family with very literal parents and have been working for almost 60 years not to be so literal myself. So I can sympathize with those who sometimes miss the humor in things. That's why I also continually request grace from others when I sometimes miss the art in things...
Mar 30, 2019 13:00:11 #
Mar 30, 2019 17:50:25 #
Thanks.
I hate to say it but I'm for least amount of Photoshopping possible unless Photoshopping is the main purpose of the photo.
I hate to say it but I'm for least amount of Photoshopping possible unless Photoshopping is the main purpose of the photo.
Mar 30, 2019 18:51:57 #
no12mo wrote:
Thanks.
I hate to say it but I'm for least amount of Photoshopping possible unless Photoshopping is the main purpose of the photo.
I hate to say it but I'm for least amount of Photoshopping possible unless Photoshopping is the main purpose of the photo.
Agreed!
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.