Which camera would you choose (Page 2): Ken Rockwell has a direct comparison of the 2 afore mentioned cameras. http://www.kenrockwell.com/canon/6d/vs-5d-mark-iii.htm I hope ths helps...

Elmosal Loc: Austin Tx

Gibar wrote:

I'm thinking about purchasing a new full frame cam... (show quote)

Ken Rockwell has a direct comparison of the 2 afore mentioned cameras. http://www.kenrockwell.com/canon/6d/vs-5d-mark-iii.htm
I hope ths helps

oldtool2 Loc: South Jersey

Gibar wrote:

I'm thinking about purchasing a new full frame cam... (show quote)

There are more differences than you might think. Take a look at the side by side comparason here.

http://www.dpreview.com/products/compare/side-by-side?products=canon_eos6d&products=canon_eos5dmkii

Also keep in mind that the 6D is a newer camera, by 4 years. I think it has a slight edge on most everything over the 5D mk II. Version III would be a different story but it is a lot more expensive. I would go with the 6D.

You can also read in depth reviews of both camera bodies here:

http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/canoneos5dmarkii/

http://www.dpreview.com/previews/canon-eos-6d/

Jim D

Bubu Loc: Out of this solar system

Griff wrote:

Tainkc.

When I see that a beginner is unable to make up their mind about a camera because of tiny and almost irrelevant differences in specification I think it appropriate to advise them to stand back a moment and really consider what sort of camera would be best for them.
Sorry if this modest ambition offends you.

And thanks for the break, Erv, at least you seem to have got out of bed the right side today.

We shouldn't been burnt by our opinions, only for our rudeness, and I don't think you were rude.

imagemeister Loc: mid east Florida

If you have not been there already, check out Ken Rockwell's review/opinion of the 6D !

tainkc Loc: Kansas City

Griff wrote:

Tainkc.

When I see that a beginner is unable to make up their mind about a camera because of tiny and almost irrelevant differences in specification I think it appropriate to advise them to stand back a moment and really consider what sort of camera would be best for them.
Sorry if this modest ambition offends you.

And thanks for the break, Erv, at least you seem to have got out of bed the right side today.

Just giving you a hard time.

Griff Loc: Warwick U.K.

Thank you, Bubu.
I must confess I was a little surprised by the response to what I intended to be a helpful piece of advice.
Regards.

ijustshotu Loc: Northern California

tainkc wrote:

quote=Griff Non of the above. br At least think a... (show quote)

:thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup:

saichiez Loc: Beautiful Central Oregon

photoninja1 wrote:

I lean toward the 6D with the most recent video tech and Wi-
fi capability. The other spec differences are of little difference in every day shooting. Oh, and it is a little faster and focus a little better.

The Canon 6D is getting hammered hard on the internet for extensive "moire" problems on the video. In fact, the reports favor the MK III 5D all over the 6D.

I do not do video, but in light of the reports and chatter on the web, I would not consider a 6D, even though it is getting raves on the still image side.

Do yourself a favor and yahoo or google

Canon 6D video
Canon 6D Moire

It appears between the search for the $2000 Full Frame is still eluding both Nikon and Canon.

jeep_daddy Loc: Prescott AZ

6D over the 5DII but save your money and invest in the 5DIII if you can. It's better than both.

olcoach Loc: Oregon

I hope the OP isn't as confused as I would be at this point. Based on the replies here I would cancel my two choices and be looking for something else. This is not a criticism of any of the comments but it sounds like both cameras have issues that I wouldn't want to deal with. Have fun and keep shootin'. Mike

Griff Loc: Warwick U.K.

At the risk of incurring tainkc's further fury I really would suggest Gibar reviews his camera requirements.
As a photographer of many years experience I find that, most other things being equal, weight and size are of much more significance than synch speed or even maximum shutter speed.
Will the 6D or the 5D go in your jacket pocket?
(Also at the price one would think that Canon would have provided a tilting screen.)
Gibar, six months down the line, when the SLR is in the car rather than over your shoulder, remember what I said.

Elmosal Loc: Austin Tx

olcoach wrote:

I hope the OP isn't as confused as I would be at this point. Based on the replies here I would cancel my two choices and be looking for something else. This is not a criticism of any of the comments but it sounds like both cameras have issues that I wouldn't want to deal with. Have fun and keep shootin'. Mike

Olcoach, unfortunately it seems there is not camera nor lens perfect for every occasion when you read reviews & opinions of people. I have lived with my XTi for 8 years & upgraded the glass a few weeks ago but I want to upgrade the body & I have changed my mind to many times to count. You can ask 30 people the camera question & get 15 different responses. It seems very serious photographers & pros have many lenses & a couple of different bodies of which many people can't afford that luxury.when I read the Ken Rockwell dude by side review fot bang for the buck it was 6D hands down.i think I will sit back for the 7D MKii as rumored & catch a deal on the current 7D but who knows.

Gibar

You would think that Canon would have a semi-pro camera body that most people would agree would be a solid platform that one could enhance their skills with and grow with them for years. This is just a hobby for me and I have a hard time justifying a $3500 camera body. Yes it would be nice to have the latest and greatest equipment but I am sure that most professionals as well as hobbyists would agree that photography is not a cheap endevor. If any 6D or 5D Mk II owners would like to comment on their cameras auto focusing capabilities it would be more than welcome. I am just looking for a good solid full frame camera body in the canon line as I do have a considerable investment in Canon glass. Image quality is a high priority for me and have no interest in shooting video, so video quality on the 6D is not a concern. Are not hobbies supposed to relieve stress?...lol

tainkc Loc: Kansas City

Griff wrote:

At the risk of incurring tainkc's further fury I r... (show quote)

Lol! Good comeback.

Jblanke Loc: Metairie, LA

I had ordered and received the Canon 6D prior to Christmas. I got cold feet on it for a number of reasons, but mainly because it was untested and I didn't like the control layout on the rear of the camera. The "wheel within a wheel" control on the back side of the camera reminded me too much of a Rebel that I owned a number of years ago, which I wasn't nuts about. Additionally, other than the manufacturer hype, there were no reviews to rely on. Accordingly, I did not even open the shipping box.....I returned it after 2-3 days and ordered the 5D Mk ii.......I have never looked back. I was raised on a 40D and the layout is essentially the same, so there was no learning curve, except for all the nuances of a 5D MKii. I also saved about $500 in the exchange. I wouldn't send my 5D Mk ii back for all the tea in china. Many will disagree, and maybe rightfully so. But, that's my story. Good luck.