Looks fine to me.
But I don't go looking for hand or clothes "details".
I just enjoy the shot as a whole.
Longshadow wrote:
Looks fine to me.
But I don't go looking for hand or clothes "details".
I just enjoy the shot as a whole.
Newspapers have to be (should be) careful about publishing phony photos.
I heard from the news that it was Kate's picture, taken by her husband, and that she did the editing herself. If so, wasn't it her's to do with as she saw fit? I don't think she was deliberately making a "phony" image.
jerryc41 wrote:
Newspapers have to be (should be) careful about publishing phony photos.
Yes for "news", but a touched-up family photo?
But the Royal Family is
always under scrutiny. Little, if any, privacy.
God forbid someone should remove zits on teenagers.......
Longshadow wrote:
Yes for "news", but a touched-up family photo?
But the Royal Family is always under scrutiny. Little, if any, privacy.
God forbid someone should remove zits on teenagers.......
According to the news, it was more of a composite photo, meant to show that Kate is doing fine when, maybe, she isn't. This wasn't a case of adjusting contrast and exposure, and it's unlikely that Kate did this herself. Because the royals are talking, rumors will continue to spread.
jerryc41 wrote:
This is probably the wrong section, but here goes.... (
show quote)
Personally I think they are trying to make a mountain from a mole hill. Kate has admitted she did some adjustments to the photo and that she is an amateur photographer. Therefore, it seems the photo would not be perfect.
PhotogHobbyist wrote:
Personally I think they are trying to make a mountain from a mole hill. Kate has admitted she did some adjustments to the photo and that she is an amateur photographer. Therefore, it seems the photo would not be perfect.
"Some adjustments" covers a lot of territory. Bruce Jenner had "some adjustments" made. If major newspapers refuse to publish this picture, the adjustments were probably more deceptive than aesthetic.
Burtzy
Loc: Bronx N.Y. & Simi Valley, CA
Yeah, it's clear those hands holding the kids come from nowhere and really aren't Kate's. She clearly has no arms. And certainly an AI which so far is not very good at hands, crossed the fingers of the younger boy. But really, the things that supposedly were manipulated are so minor as to be a nothingburger...and as we know, nothingburgers hid in the background of all photos. What a waste of journalism.
GregS
Loc: Central Illinois, USA
I agree...looks good to me. What am I missing??
Looks fine to me except the extra set of hands, who do they belong to?
On the bright side...when the world war kicks into gear, we won't have to be inundated with this piffle.
jerryc41 wrote:
"Some adjustments" covers a lot of territory. Bruce Jenner had "some adjustments" made. If major newspapers refuse to publish this picture, the adjustments were probably more deceptive than aesthetic.
Did Bruce save the "Raw" version so that he could return to the original in case he changes his mind?
This will be filed away in my "Who cares?" archive.
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.