And here we go again with total non sense from judges...
Feb 23, 2024 04:28:54 #
Shutterbug1697 wrote:
But when "Evangelical Christians" get word that this works in Alabama, they're going to shove their MINORITY religious beliefs down the throats of the throats of the Majority of the rest of the country by enacting copycat laws.
The Dobbs decision has emboldened them.
The Dobbs decision has emboldened them.
“Welcome to the theocracy.” Ruth Marcus, The Washington Post https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2024/02/20/alabama-frozen-embryos-ruling-human/
" ... The longer-term danger—indeed the apparent longer-term goal—is to raise and expand the definition of unborn personhood, to go after birth control methods and reproductive technologies that involve fertilized eggs. Will fertility clinics be permitted to dispose of unused frozen embryos? Could states prohibit in vitro fertilization altogether? Will IUDs, birth control pills or the morning-after pill be banned? ... "
Daily Kos - " ... It would be a mistake to view the Alabama decision as a fluke or aberration, one perhaps unique to that state alone. The reality is that it’s simply a blueprint, a template for theocratic policies eagerly sought by the Christian right and now well along in the planning stages, if only Trump gets another term in office. ... "
Feb 23, 2024 09:25:28 #
SteveR wrote:
Where are you pulling this from? What would you call "common law?" How could a law passed in another state be the basis for a judgment in another? That's ludicrous.
Have you been keeping up with the thread?
There is statutory law and there is common law. Study the definition of stare decisis.
Read a book.
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.