Toby wrote:
Now I am confused! I recently spoke with a young computer science student about back up drives. His opinion was that hard drives were better because they were cheaper, lasted longer and the data could usually be recovered, although expensive. SSD he said, do not last as long and when they fail the data is not recoverable. I would like to hear comments from those of you who have had ACUTAL EXPERIENCE with both. Thank you
============================
Toby...
In your post, you said:
..... "I would like to hear comments from those of you who have had ACTUAL EXPERIENCE with both."
Hers is my 2¢ - I have had all and experienced 'failure' on many, including RAID, and IDE..
My current situation is:
1 - 1TB M.2 SSD which is C: Drive with OS and all EXE only
2 - 4TB M.2 SSD which is I: Drive for 'Interim' data - i.e. Current Images only 2020-2024
3 - 12TB IDE Drive which is H: Drive for 'Historical' data - i.e. Older Images before 2020
4 - 18TB External USB which is used to have a 'backup' of all of the above
5 - 25TB External NAS via home network - which is used to have 2nd backup of all of the above
6 - Cloud Storage via BackBlaze - which is used to have a 3rd backup of all of the above...
In closing -- I have 'Backups' and I have backups... ha ha ha ha...
..... And, when I lost my first RAID NAS some 7 years ago,
..... Brand is NOT critical, as long as you have 'multiple backups' AND, I do.
..... I swore I would never be caught with my backup down (and dead)
Any questions, let me know -- Hard Drives are 'cheap insurance' these days compare to 'trying to recover'
YES... I know there are many other ways it can be done, my thought is everyone is responsible for their own... and what you choose is "OK" for you...
Cheers
Goldstar46
George Veazey
###