Blurryeyed wrote:
You should be too.... At least you are coming closer to coming out of the closet.
Does being that unpleasant really make you happy? I find that hard to believe.
thom w wrote:
nobody seem him?. And you criticize me for grammar and spelling? Some of it may be deserving of criticism, but not from the likes of you.
Lol goodness you have low reading comprehension skills. I wasn’t criticizing you because of your grammar. I was criticizing you because you were criticizing somebody else for the reading comprehension issues. Wow you flipped out on the grammar skills. I was just pointing out your hypocrisy.
Blurryeyed wrote:
I'm not angry, I just don't go with the BS, Barr did not lie, he gave a fair characterization of the Mueller report, if there was a bit of a dispute between the understanding between Barr and Mueller after the report came out so what. Bottomline Mueller did not find anything that would have lead to credible charges against Trump. Even though Mueller said that there was no evidence of collusion you people were so bloodthirsty that you wanted Trump charged with obstruction even though he had his entire staff cooperate with the investigation and did not try to fight to withhold information on executive privilege...
I will never agree with you Thom, and my animation is basically because I think that the folks who continue to disparage Barr are poorly informed Jerks.
I'm not angry, I just don't go with the BS, Barr d... (
show quote)
Hell! Trump tried to claim executive privilege even when he was no longer president.
Racmanaz wrote:
Lol goodness you have low reading comprehension skills. I wasn’t criticizing you because of your grammar. I was criticizing you because you were criticizing somebody else for the reading comprehension issues. Wow you flipped out on the grammar skills. I was just pointing out your hypocrisy.
If one never understands what is written to them, what would you call it? Seems like low, or no reading comprehension to me.
thom w wrote:
If one never understands what is written to them, what would you call it? Seems like low, or no reading comprehension to me.
Will you finally recognize your hypocrisy?
Blurryeyed wrote:
LOL.... Mueller had nothing on Trump, the entire exercise was a waste of time, even the quasi accusations that Mueller sheepishly came up with were ridiculous, just an effort to justify time and money spent, especially since a big chunk of it went into Mueller's pocket.
Barr did not lie.
You have become a total ideologue.
Racmanaz wrote:
Will you finally recognize your hypocrisy?
I've become tired of you. Bother someone who wants bothered.
thom w wrote:
I've become tired of you. Bother someone who wants bothered.
Of course you are tired of someone that puts a hypocrite like you in their place.
Racmanaz wrote:
Of course you are tired of someone that puts a hypocrite like you in their place.
It's good that you are impressed with yourself, as few others are.
thom w wrote:
It's good that you are impressed with yourself, as few others are.
Nobody’s impressed with you, not even yourself.
thom w wrote:
The gun charge has been ruled unconstitutional by an appellate court, don't know if is the court that has jurisdiction over his case, but the supreme court has been differential when it comes to gun rights, so I'll bet if they get it they will throw it out. This US attorney was appointed by Trump, and when Biden replaced all the other US attorneys, he kept this one because he had this case and he didn't want to be seen as interfering. You are allowed to believe what you want, but when you post stupid things not based on fact, expect to be called on it.
The gun charge has been ruled unconstitutional by ... (
show quote)
Just catching up with this thread, but everything I stated at the time I started this thread was indeed fact. Hunter was set to walk on all current and future charges and the relationship of Hunter's attornies and Weiss was described as "chummy". I also think the word you were looking for was deferential.
thom w wrote:
I was just saying that would explain your anger. I would never suggest that that should happen. Lately you have less of a sense of humor than I have been accused of. You used to be able to converse with people with different beliefs than yourself. What happened? Even though your thoughts were frequently 180 degrees from mine, you seemed like you would be a good neighbor. Today you have a litmus test for who you will get along with. I'm not suggesting you can't do that, but don't you find it limiting?
I was just saying that would explain your anger. I... (
show quote)
No I don't, my next door neighbor is a democrat whose POV is for the most part 180º from mine and we get along just fine, from time to time we even discuss politics, but more about principles rather than politicians, she spent quite a few years in Africa and the Middle East working for the State Department.
Thom, there are only one or two liberal posters here that I respect, Trip is one that I have had a great deal of respect for but even he is developing a hard head, just review the discussion he and I had the other day about debt, even though he misspoke and continued to argue his misspeak he would not admit that he made the error and that what I was saying was right... We are all getting more difficult, I used to admire the respect that Gorge showed here, not so much anymore.
That just leaves me with DaveO who is a bit smarter than all of us.
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.