cahale wrote:
Here are one of each. Sorry about the quality, but 72 res. doesn't give a lot of working room. If you still have access to the original, you might try using a good scanner (minimum 300 res.) That will give a much better base, and also eliminate the skew in the output. I had to do a little vertical correction.
Ohhh, no, you can't leave this photo the way you have. Take a look at the left-hand side of the image see all that repetitiveness in the roof and the lower section of the foliage? That all needs to be corrected if you wish this to be a finished image.