scooter1 Loc: Yacolt, Wa.

DennyT Loc: Central Missouri woods

What evidence? An “‘unsubstantiated “ report ?

letmedance Loc: Walnut, Ca.

Let me correct that for you, an investigated report. If it is unsubstantiated then why and the FBI fight so hard to not turn it over?

foodie65

Hey, if FOX, Dump or a conservative says it, it is so

scooter1 Loc: Yacolt, Wa.

Now see there you go trying to use logic with a liberal, Denny.

jcboy3

Any evidence, actually.

Bazbo Loc: Lisboa, Portugal

I will pay attention when there is an indictment.

In the meantime, this is a question everyone in Trump Town should answer. Because, you know, there are indictments.

Effate Loc: El Dorado Hills, Ca.

Sounds like you are making a tree falling in the forrest argument. Are you arguing that short of an indictment that crime hasn’t been committed and there can be no evidence of the same? A bigger concern for me in this whole equation isn’t getting Hunter or even Joe, it’s the appearance of impropriety, the enthusiasm the DOJ/FBI employs in the investigation of certain individuals vs. others, disparate treatment.

Bazbo Loc: Lisboa, Portugal

No but I do not take as evidence right wing media hyperventilating. I am all for honest investigations, but I see so far are unsubstantiated allegations. But let's
review the actual track record of recent right wing investigations:

--After five years investigating Hunter resulted in three of misdemeanors.

--The much anticipated Dunham investigation which resulted in three indictments, and only one conviction (and that was a pretty chump change affair, given the effort that went into the investigation.

--Gal Luft (the missing witness of the House Oversight Committee), who when, when found turned out he was on the lam running from his own indictment. No wonder he was on the lam.

--And of course, Benghazi that turning up zip after years of investigation. Fun fact: My Kevin even admitted that the whole Benghazi thing was political.

Impressive track record, right? And just as a thought experiment, compare that track record with Jack Smith. m\My money is on Smith, but that's just me.

What caught my eye was the title of the thread. How much evidence is enough? Still a fair question that MAGA Nation should be asking itself. But if you can't tell the difference between allegations and evidence, this is where you will find yourself.

When there are indictments, I will pat attention. While the walls close in on Criminal Defendant Trump, the right wing noise machine will do what it does: generate noise. And right wing noise will not help him now.

Reddog Loc: Southern Calif

Reddog Loc: Southern Calif

Racmanaz Loc: Sunny Tucson!

lol you were such a hypocritical fraud. With all these so-called evidence against Trump, when it came to the Russia, collusion conspiracy, you didn’t question it, you believed it even before any indictment of Trump, which none came from it.

Effate Loc: El Dorado Hills, Ca.

Five years and 3 misdemeanors is my point. Slow rolling ‘14 and ‘15 to let the statutes run and many feel he is not getting what Joe public would catch on the gun beef.

As far as the historical success of oversight type committees we both know on both sides they are political dog and pony shows.

DennyT Loc: Central Missouri woods

The question I have and that has not been answered is what others of similar charges got for punishment. Not the max available sentences/ what was actually handed down.

https://www.forbes.com/sites/kellyphillipserb/2023/06/20/hunter-biden-failed-to-pay-taxes-heres-why-hes-likely-not-going-to-jail/

Bazbo Loc: Lisboa, Portugal

Wasn't that investigation led my a Special Prosecutor appointed by Trump? Remember, the special prosecutor function is designed to be independent of political influence.

"Many feel" is not evidence. In any case, "Many feel" Hunter got exactly what any other person would have received--if not more, and that's not evidence either.

Please explain what you mean by low rolling ‘14 and ‘15 to let the statutes run".